Randy Scamihorn.jpg

Randy Scamihorn

MARIETTA — Bolstered by the election which kept them in the majority, Republicans on the Cobb Board of Education asserted control over board meetings this week.

The school board voted 4-2 Thursday to raise the bar for board members to add a topic to meeting agendas.

Previously, adding items to the agenda required the consent of three board members. The board chair also has the ability to add agenda items along with Superintendent Chris Ragsdale.

There are four Republicans on the board and three Democrats. That means that in order to have the body consider a topic, the Democrats will need the support of at least one Republican if the chairman or superintendent doesn’t support their request.

The move was proposed by Republican board member Randy Scamihorn, and it passed along party lines with Democrats Charisse Davis and Jaha Howard opposing. Democrat David Morgan was absent.

Davis said the change amounted to censorship of the three Democrats on the board, as well as the residents they represent.

Charisse Davis

Charisse Davis

“This motion changes an existing policy that ensures there is a path for board members in the minority to do the job they’re sent to do and that the state constitution requires,” she said, before turning her attention to residents and to her fellow board members. “Although you elected new leadership two years ago to represent you, the four members who think their sole job is to protect the superintendent have decided that your voice does not matter, and I would ask my colleagues, what are you so scared of?”

Scamihorn answered, but directed his comments to board Chairman Brad Wheeler at the suggestion of board attorney Clem Doyle.

“I’m going to take it as a rhetorical question to some regard because — unsubstantiated — I don’t know what we would be afraid of,” Scamihorn said. “We’re duly elected like everybody. This is an attempt to stream line the process, also to hold our meetings to a realistic length of time, so that we’re not putting items on the board that really have very little or no merit in the future.”

He added that if a board member didn’t have the support of three other members, they could always attempt to add an item to the agenda by asking the chair or superintendent.

Howard blasted the board in his comments.

“This board wants to be a rubber stamp for our superintendent and not think critically and discuss as a team what’s going on,” he said.

Howard, Jaha.jpg

Jaha Howard

Howard called the change “disgusting,” “short-sighted” “retaliatory,” and “an example of systemic racism.”

“For some reason we’re obsessed with hurrying meetings along instead of being obsessed with making sure we’re getting it right,” he said.

Last year, the Republican majority on the board voted to strike board comments from meetings, where school board members could previously give remarks freely at the end of the meeting. School board member David Chastain previously said he recommended the ban after board comments became political and divisive.

Support Local Journalism

Now, more than ever, residents need trustworthy reporting—but good journalism isn’t free. Please support us by purchasing a digital subscription. Your subscription will allow you unlimited access to important local news stories. Our mission is to keep our community informed and we appreciate your support.

2
1
0
0
2

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Mike Nelson

With the democratic members its always racist. Your favorite card.

Dazzle Faddy

When all else fails, play the race card Mr. Howard.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.