Georgia Power

ATLANTA — Georgia energy regulators approved a rate increase for Georgia Power Co. Tuesday that will raise its basic service fee for residential customers during the next three years from $10 a month to $14, or $168 a year.

Ruling on the Atlanta-based utility’s first rate case in six years, the state Public Commission voted 4-1 for a compromise the company offered last week in an agreement approved by the city of Atlanta, MARTA, The Kroger Co. and three organizations that represent Georgia manufacturers and other large commercial customers.

Georgia Power originally had proposed increasing the fixed fee to $17.95 a month.

In approving Georgia Power’s offer, the commission rejected alternatives advocated both by the agency’s staff and commission Chairman Lauren “Bubba” McDonald, the lone commissioner to vote against the rate hike.

The staff and McDonald pushed for a lower profit margin for Georgia Power. On Tuesday, McDonald proposed setting that “return on equity” at 10.25%, well below the 10.9% ROE the utility originally requested and 10.5%, the final number the commission approved.

Commissioner Tim Echols, who suggested the final number, said a 10.5% profit margin would protect Georgia Power’s financial integrity, including its credit with bond-rating agencies.

“Maintaining Georgia Power’s financial integrity is important to me and the economy of this state,” he said. “This keeps the company on the low side of Moody’s and S&P’s metrics.”

Environmental and consumer advocacy groups opposed to the increase in the basic monthly fee Georgia Power originally proposed remained dissatisfied with the compromise offer the commission approved.

“Customers who earn a fixed or lower income suffer the most from high electric bills,” said Codi Norred, program director for Georgia Interfaith Power & Light. “Allowing Georgia Power to increase mandatory fees only makes that burden even greater.”

Kurt Ebersbach, senior attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, noted that none of the industrial intervenors that signed onto the agreement with Georgia Power represent any of its 2.2 million residential customers.

“While Georgia Power did not get everything it wanted, it’s disappointing that residential customers will now suffer additional financial burden and less control over their electric bills,” he said.

Commissioner Tricia Pridemore described Tuesday’s vote as a pro-business move by the PSC against burdensome government regulation.

“Nationally, we see utilities filing bankruptcy due to overregulation,” she said. “Georgia is different.”

As part of its agreement offer, Georgia Power will not increase rates next year. Instead, the monthly fee will go from $10 to $12 in 2021 and to $14 the following year.


(1) comment

Robert Roth

It is my wish that Georgia Power and the Southern Company go bankrupt!! Maybe they will then be precluded from pouring $ Billions into losers such as a coal gasification plant in Kemper, Miss. It went belly up and cost $7.3 Billion. But perhaps the biggest white elephant of recent times is reactors 3 & 4 at Plant Vogtle!! I have lost track of how many $ Billions have been wasted. The last figure that I was presented with was $27.3 Billion about two years ago. Does the PSC have ANY UPPER LIMIT ON THE WASTE of money to be incurred?? Solar is much cheaper than nuclear. If we just had 15% of the money wasted on Vogtle and used it to encourage customers to install solar on their roofs along with power walls to store excess energy, I doubt if any further requirement for power would be necessary. Power walls are manufactured by Tesla. Any product with similar capabilities when available should be considered. Unfortunately, Georgia Power offers NO rebates for solar installation. Our PSC should require generous rebates are given for solar and power walls. Of course, our rubber stamp PSC will do no such thing. That would cut into Georgia Power's bottom line. Forget that our planet will be destroyed by global warming. We must protect their profitability!!

I have read that California now has an excess of solar energy. Why don't we at least examine their example?

When the coal gasification plant in Kemper, Miss went kaput I wrote: "they tried to resurrect coal, what were they thinking"? Now I believe that it is apparent what they were thinking. They will attempt to produce energy from any source, regardless of the chance of success, provided that they do not have to share any profit or do not negatively affect their bottom line. It is already too late to prevent some of the worst effects of global warming. Unless we assign a priority to fight global warming greater than that assigned to the Manhatten Project in WWII or JFK's man on the moon our planet probably does not stand a chance of survival!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.