Bill Press: Republican platform: Welfare for the rich
by Bill Press
Columnist
August 30, 2010 12:00 AM | 507 views | 5 5 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Bill Press
Bill Press
slideshow
Something important happened this week: Republican leaders in Congress finally came out for something.

Don't knock it. This is progress. We know what they're against: anything President Obama is for. He's for tax breaks for small business; they're against 'em. He's for extending unemployment benefits; they're against it. He's for emergency funds to states for keeping cops, firemen, teachers, and nurses on the job; they vote no.

As Vice President Joe Biden observed, "I know what the Republicans are against. I have no notion of what they're for." Well, now we do. As articulated by Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, they are for extending George Bush's tax cuts to the top 2 percent of American taxpayers. And that singular priority speaks volumes about the intellectual poverty of the Republican Party today.

After all, the wealthiest of the wealthy have already enjoyed an undeserved free ride for 10 years, gobbling up a huge tax break that could easily have paid for universal health care or the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Making those tax breaks permanent, or even extending them for another 10 years, is bad public policy.

As payback to major campaign donors, Bush forced his tax cuts through early in his presidency by means of "reconciliation" in the Senate - the same process Republicans ripped Democrats for using to pass health care reform legislation. He insisted they were only "temporary" - they expire at the end of 2010 - because it was the only way he could sell them politically and because he assumed Congress would automatically renew them 10 years later.

Not so fast. President Obama supports extending the Bush tax cuts for 98 percent of Americans, those making $200,000 or less ($250,000 for joint filers).

But he opposes a continued tax holiday for the top 2 percent, the wealthiest of Americans. Reason? Because it would cost too much, we'd get too little in return, and only a handful of Americans would benefit.

According to the independent Tax Policy Center, extending tax cuts for the rich would cost an additional $700 billion over the next 10 years. Nearly all of it would go to the richest 1 percent of Americans, those with incomes of more than $500,000 a year. And, of that group, the majority of tax cuts would go to the wealthiest one-tenth of 1 percent. Which translates, over the next decade, into an average $3 million windfall each year for precisely 120,000 people.

Not only have Republicans made pimping tax cuts for the rich their number one issue, they do so with a set of lies that only George W. Bush could love: this is no time for raising taxes; there's no need to worry about the deficit; letting Bush tax breaks expire will hurt small business; and extending tax breaks to the wealthy will actually create jobs. No, no, no, and no.

First, a reality check. No matter how many times Boehner and McConnell say the opposite, allowing the Bush cuts to expire does not amount to a tax increase. It simply means the 10-year tax privilege enjoyed by the privileged few will end, as the law states, and their tax rate will return from today's top 35 percent (which few pay, anyway) to 39.6 percent - but only on income more than $250,000 a year.

And, no doubt, that'll save taxpayers a lot of money. Most people don't understand that a tax cut is actually a government expense, which we have to pay for somehow. Republicans would simply pile that $700 billion cost onto an already dangerously bloated federal deficit - even though, just last month, they opposed adding $34 billion to the deficit to extend unemployment benefits.

Equally hypocritical are Republican claims that ending tax cuts for the rich would hurt small business. As Vice President Joe Biden said this week, that's "a bunch of malarkey." Only 3 percent of small businesses make more than $500,000 a year in profits - and most of them are big law firms, not Mom and Pop storefronts.

Their final argument about creating new jobs is the most absurd of all. Just look around you. If tax cuts for the wealthy really create jobs, where are they? Instead, under George W. Bush, America lost 8 million jobs.

Forget their twisted logic. In the end, it boils down to this: middle-class Americans need a tax cut.

The top 2 percent of Americans don't.

Bill Press is host of a nationally syndicated radio show.
Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
former Republican
|
September 02, 2010
First I am SHOCKED that the MDJ would publish anything putting Republicans in a bad light. But I have scanned and emailed the article and am sending it to all my middle class Republican acquaintances. I have been telling them for years that they are selling themselves down the river to the Republicans for their empty promises on the Right to Life issue. Not that the Democrats are any better about helping the Middle class, but the Republicans do diddly squat for the working poor. Thank you, Mr. Press.
Idiocracy
|
August 31, 2010
Bill Press must be some kind of baby-selling, evil Communist who would hand over our great country right to Fidel, for daring to suggest that we stop shoveling everything we can to the top 2%. We owe The Rich our very lives, for allowing us to humbly gaze over their fences, while they wisely spend our grandchildren's futures on their travels, their super-luxury vehicles, their helicopters and their lavish cocaine parties. We can only bow down in gratitude to The Rich, for so kindly tolerating our slovenly, ill-bred ways. Isn't that the very reason for our existence as a nation? I for one am eternally grateful that The Rich may walk upon me and my efforts any time they so desire. Palin in '12, and away with that filthy commie Barack Hussein Saddam Obama!!
La La Land
|
August 31, 2010
Oh...I forgot to mention Mr. Press' article is absolutely full-up with massive distortion of the facts, and outright lies. The second paragraph in his article is nothing but vacuous talking-points trash.

And for Press to say the Tax Policy Center is "independent" is like saying Joe Biden is the smartest guy in Washington. Heck...they want a VAT tax, and call it "The" solution. Now that's real bright. My goodness, that VAT tax sure has kept Europe humming away. Not!

Anyway, thanks Bill for yet another installment of Liberals in La-La Land: Where believers never let facts get in the way of their feelings.
La La Land
|
August 31, 2010
Mr. Press is always good for a laugh.

I seriously think he has gone around the bend.

As Twisted Logic points out, there just isn't any logic in Press' non-argument. Delusional is a better word -- sorta like a certain president we know saying (and believing) his reaction to the BP blowout was "immediate", thorough, fast, complete, and effective. Please folks...what universe are you liberals living in?
Twisted Logic??
|
August 30, 2010
Talk about twisted logic, Mr. Press' definition of "welfare" is allowing the people who pay about 97% of all income taxes in this country to keep more of their own money that they EARN. Twisted logic #2 - raising marginal rates is not a tax increase because tax rates used to be higher in the past. Marginal tax rates were about 85% decades ago, so I guess Press can call this a tax cut. Twisted logic #3 - Mr. Press thinks this action will have no unintended consenquences on anyone else. As long as you don't have a job now and don't need one in the future, then repealing "welfare" for the rich won't affect you. You'll be fine. Sure. Please keep speaking out Mr. Press. You're cogent explanations of liberal "logic" is the last best hope America has to kill liberalism once and for all.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.