Don McKee: Will 'Race to the Top' make a difference in academics?
by Don McKee
Columnist
August 27, 2010 12:00 AM | 583 views | 2 2 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Don McKee
Don McKee
slideshow
Georgia is a $400 million winner in the "Race to the Top" for federal money for schools, one of nine states chosen in the latest round for creating "ambitious yet achievable plans for implementing coherent, compelling, and comprehensive education reform."

That's from the U.S. Department of Education, which describes the $4.35 billion "Race" program as "an unprecedented federal investment in reform."

Gov. Sonny Perdue, who went all-out for the money, said, "This is truly a unique opportunity to implement a Georgia-created plan that will accelerate our work in improving student achievement."

State school Superintendent Brad Bryant said, "Going for Race to the Top has never been about just the money, but more about further development of our foundation to drive increased student achievement."

Unlike the "stimulus" money that kept Georgia schools from falling into an even deeper financial hole the last couple of years, the "Race" money supposedly cannot be spent on reducing class sizes, hiring teachers or adding days to the school year - what many people might call the basics.

Neither will the new money come in one lump but "will be distributed over time as the grantees meet established benchmarks," DOE says. And recipient states are supposed to lead "in comprehensive, coherent, statewide education reform across four key areas."

Take a look at those areas, per the DOE:

1. "Adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace;

2. "Building data systems that measure student growth and success, and inform teachers and principals how to improve instruction;

3. "Recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining effective teachers and principals, especially where they are needed most; and

4. "Turning around their lowest-performing schools."

You probably thought Georgia already was doing all those things, based on what's been said by state school officials in recent years. But one of the new programs to be funded by the "Race" money, according to news reports, is a merit-pay pilot program for teachers. If that has a familiar ring, it's another form of the teacher-pay-for-student-performance bill Perdue tried his hardest to push or sneak through the last General Assembly session but failed. It was all about getting the federal grant.

As was pointed out here, if teachers are going to be paid based on performance of their students, then the same rule should be applied across the board to state and local officials and legislators. If it's good for teachers, it's got to be good for everybody else.

Anyway, only 26 school districts signed on for the "Race," meaning that they are supposed to get 50 percent of the $400 million "to meaningfully enact the Race to the Top reforms," according to the governor's news release.

Cobb and Marietta are out of the race. Cobb didn't apply and Marietta wasn't eligible, not being "low performing."

Will "Race to the Top" make a significant difference in Georgia's low-performing schools and overall academic achievement? Who knows? But one thing's for sure: it will bring more federal control.

dmckee9613@aol.com
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
taxpayer with kids
|
November 26, 2010
Decade over decade the quality of education our children are receiving deteriorates. Inside the box thinking has continued to be applied to the problem and the constituencies that support that thinking have perpetuated.

I'm ready for disruption. My children need it for their future.

If pay-for-performance and putting children first (not unions) is ineffective - please suggest alternatives that aren't simply variants on the tired tried and tried and....what do you suggest?
former teacher
|
August 27, 2010
No. It is a waste of money, will cause a waste of time trying to comply with the idiotic criteria and is too grandly worded to be of any value. It will distract from the time available to solve real problems. It is much more of a disruption than a help and is typical of efforts to force untried and unworkable fashions onto our educational systems.

Only liberal, moronic bureaucrats could imagine that it would be beneficial. (did you see New Jerseys 1000 page losing entry into the competition?)
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.