Marietta schools not eligible, Cobb chose not to participate in federal grant competition
by Kathryn Dobies
kdobies@mdjonline.com
August 25, 2010 12:00 AM | 2892 views | 17 17 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA - While 26 of Georgia's school districts will be getting $400 million to share from the second round of President Barack Obama's Race to the Top dollars, Cobb and Marietta schools are not among them.

In fact, Marietta City Schools was never eligible for the federal funds, intended to support new approaches to improve schools, because they do not meet the criteria of "low performing" set by federal education officials. To be eligible for RTTT money, a school system must have an overall graduation rate below 60 percent, and Marietta High School has a graduation rate of 83.7 percent. Eligibility for lower grades is based on achieving adequate yearly progress based on the state's Criterion Referenced Competency Tests, and Dr. Debra Pickett, Marietta's assistant superintendent of curriculum and instruction, explained to the Marietta board in January that the system did not have "what are considered to be failing schools."

Although Marietta was not eligible for the federal funding, Marietta High School Principal Leigh Colburn was one of five team leaders involved in writing Georgia's application for the RTTT funds. Colburn said she worked with the Office of Student Achievement last fall and served as the team leader of the supporting low achieving schools task force.

Colburn called the Race to the Top program ambitious, "with a potential for unprecedented impact for Georgia's schools."

"Georgia's lowest-performing schools targeted for intervention have the opportunity to receive substantial financial support in exchange for a high level of accountability," she said via email on Tuesday. "Other components of the Race to the Top grant touched upon topics such as school leader and teacher effectiveness, the collection and use of student data, performance based pay, enhancing standards and assessment, and charter schools. I believe these components of the grant could have the most direct impact upon our local schools in Cobb and Marietta."

Georgia, along with eight other states and the District of Columbia, was chosen as a winner for the federal RTTT funds on Tuesday. In the first round, awarded in the spring, only two states - Tennessee and Delaware - won the funding. Georgia came in third in the first round. The state then reapplied for round two and was named a finalist in July for that round of RTTT money.

While Cobb schools were eligible for RTTT funding, school board members made it clear they were not interested in applying for the grant, although it is unclear when and if the board spoke about it in public.

In early January, Superintendent Fred Sanderson advised the board against participating in Race to the Top.

"As of right now, given the ambiguity of the grant's application and the long-term consequences a commitment of this degree may have on our district, my recommendation is to not submit a (memo of understanding) to the state for the Race to the Top grant," Sanderson wrote to board members in a Jan. 4 memo.

And during a March editorial board interview at the Journal, board Chairwoman Lynnda Crowder-Eagle insisted that the board did discuss whether the district should apply for Race To The Top, although she did not specify when.

"It was brought up, it was on the agenda, I know at least one time, and we did discuss it," Crowder-Eagle said at that time. "I didn't see a lot of interest from it coming out."

An analysis of the board's meeting agendas from November 2009 until March 2010 show no indication that RTTT was ever discussed. Applications were open in November 2009 for local school districts to apply to the state Department of Education to be included in RTTT.

When asked for the positives and negatives to applying for the federal dollars, Crowder-Eagle said she worried about loss of local control over the school system.

"Positives, money and money," the Cobb board chairwoman said. "Negatives: there are a lot of parameters to this. Perhaps a loss of local control."

The Cobb board's vice-chair Holli Cash agreed with Crowder-Eagle, as did board member-elect Kathleen Angelucci, who will take over Dr. John Abraham's north Cobb Post 6 seat in January, and Scott Sweeney, the Republican candidate vying for Dr. John Crooks' Post 6 east Cobb seat against Democrat Dr. Rick Welkis.

In response to a candidate survey for the primary election in July, Cash, a Democrat who is seeking reelection in November, said: "No! The money comes with too many strings attached and will cost the District more in the long run."

Tim Stultz, the Republican candidate running against Cash said Tuesday that he was also happy that Cobb chose not to apply for RTTT funds.

"I do think it's a good thing that Cobb didn't go for it," Stultz said. "Because I think it gives more control away from the local district."

In the same candidate questionnaire, Angelucci said: "It would be foolish for us to commit ourselves to unknown terms and conditions. We would also sacrifice local control and decisions for government mandates that we would eventually have to fund ourselves. The cost to modify text books and instructional materials to comply with the federal government's vision for public education could cost Georgian's millions of dollars that we do not have."

Sweeney also worried about the loss of local control.

"No. With federal dollars, you know there are long, strong strings attached and at what cost," Sweeney said. "You give up what makes this community so special; local control. ... We have the capacity and the intelligence to do what it takes to improve student achievement while reducing federal government interference. Besides, local control isn't the only expense. Federal programs are usually proven to be very inefficient. The costs for Race To The Top funds from a dollar, resource, administrative and time perspective are likely to outweigh the proposed program cost benefits."

Dr. Rick Welkis, the Democrat running for the Post 6 seat, said "I'm for it, have always been for it, and it's ashame we didn't throw our hat in."
Comments
(17)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Classroom Size
|
September 02, 2010
To Scott Sweeney and Kathleen Angelucci: Please do something about our oversized classrooms. It is not uncommon for some classrooms to have 40 students. On days when all of the students report to class, some of them do not have desks. I cannot wait until both of you are sworn in. I know that you support the kids and the teachers. Cobb County teachers are depending on you.
To 1867
|
August 28, 2010
The Cobb County School Board got it right concerning Race To The Top funding from the federal government. I have checked and there are many strings attached. I do not know a single Cobb teacher who is in favor of Race To The Top funding. Cobb School District will accept $20,000,000 in federal stimulus funds, however. Mr. Sanderson wants to use these funds to resume step increases to teachers and to reduce two of the five days of forced furlough days.
Just Wait
|
August 26, 2010
How many of you really know what and if there are "strings" attached to this money? My guess is that you are saying it is evil simply because it comes from a Democratic federal government and as good, loyal Republicans, you are required to stick with the NO party line.
Freda Alphengruber
|
August 26, 2010
Ella is exactly right. This money has too many strings. For the rest of you moochers who think that anything is "free", just do a little research. Many states have the smarts to not even try. Others are now regretting the decision to take the money due to the problems this new beauracratic monster has created for them. Say what you want but Cobb got this one right. The Obamabots can stay out of our schools!
West Cobb Resident
|
August 26, 2010
If Obama's got it, I don't want it.
Curious One
|
August 25, 2010
Marietta City schools "never eligible" - I think Gov. Perdue should direct special investigators (Bowers and Wilson)to look into the Marietta numbers and then take a look at the idiots on the Cobb School Board @!
1867
|
August 25, 2010
It's absolutely ridiculous that the board didn't even bother to try to find out what the "Race to the Top" program was all about. The fact that there is no indication that the board discussed it is not surprising. Now, the cash strapped school system looks like its being run by some village idiots who are using the 'boogey man' federal government as an excuse for not even applying for the funds. Did any board member really bother to take the time to weigh the pro's and the cons of the program...did you Holli? did you Lynda? From what I know - you didn't. The entire board should be ashamed, and the parents of Cobb County ought to call them to task at the next board meeting.
money for cheaters?
|
August 25, 2010
let me get this straight-the federal government has decided to give hundreds of millions of dollars to Atlanta Public Schools-in the midst of a huge test cheating scandal? And part of this money is for performance based pay-what a joke!

this is one decision the board got right-federal money means you do what the feds say. As for the republican governor being all for it-it's just money Georgia won't have to pay out.
ATF
|
August 25, 2010
I haven't kept up but I am surprised - well, not really - you mean it was never publically discussed at a CCSB meeting?

Crowder-Eagle, et al, must have discussed this in "executive session", again, and she got confused, again, about what is discussed and decided in illegal executive sessions that were okayed, again, by the attorneys from the law firm who have been the same law firm for upteen years.

Maybe it is just as well. If the CCSB can't keep straight Georgia open meeting laws, they could never keep straight federal government terms and conditions of a grant program.

el paso
|
August 25, 2010
The program outlined what the conditions are. I doubt any of these people even read the rules.
Ha!
|
August 25, 2010
"Local Control", that's a laugh. It's a real booger when you're forced to follow someone else's nonsensical vision, isn't it LCE? To be fair though, this sounds like one of those "vote to pass the bill to find out what's in the bill" programs. Smart move to decline it.
Ella Mentary
|
August 25, 2010
Government funds will mean government mandates.We don't even know what they could be with Race to the Top. Rejecting such funds and their subsequent mandates is the smartest thing this board could do. Cobb citizens want to reclaim this school board
tclab
|
August 25, 2010
Even the republican gov. was behind the state's application for the funds-maybe Cobb would not have been faced with laying off so many teachers-only to hire some back-local control of what?
frustratedcobbparent
|
August 25, 2010
Another poor, private decision by the board. Perhaps you need help to define "local control" that does NOT mean what the few of you decide to do in the back room of a meeting hall.

It involves every child, parent and teacher in the county, how about getting some input! I hope that transparency is in the plan for 2010/2011 because right now you all look like a bumbling brood of self-serving incompetents.

special fred
|
August 25, 2010
Too bad it's not a race to the top for the most illegal board votes, crooked tribunals, secret lawyer contracts, grand jury transportation investigations, coverups, etc...
Acworth
|
August 25, 2010
AND WHERE HAS 'LOCAL CONTROL' GOTTEN US?? You self-important idiots.
distracted driver
|
August 25, 2010
There's no such thing as free money.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.