"There will be an acknowledgement of responsibility and there will be sanctions," special prosecutor Rick Malone said. "We're trying very hard not to make this less than it is, nor more than it is. Sometimes that's a really hard battle, especially under the scrutiny that this case has been placed under. We want to make sure we're fair to the county, the police, and to the defendants and to the other people in the community."
Malone would not disclose any details of sentences the women will receive, because the deal is not yet in writing. But he said the charges all remain the same and sentencing was set for the week of Oct. 26. The written agreement will likely be submitted to the court clerk next week, he said.
The two women were arrested March 5 on misdemeanor charges stemming from an underage drinking party police discovered at Busch's home in the wee hours of Dec. 22, 2009. Ten teenagers were cited there for underage drinking.
Busch, 48, a lawyer and former municipal court judge in the city of Woodstock and elsewhere, is charged with a total of 21 counts: 10 counts of furnishing alcohol to a person under age 21; six counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor; four counts of possession of alcohol by a person under age 21; and one count of obstruction and hindering of a law enforcement officer.
Middleton, 47, who was the first adult to speak to police when they arrived at Busch's home about 3 a.m. on Dec. 22, is charged with a total of 20 counts that are identical to Busch's but without the obstruction charge.
Malone, director of the Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia, has taken over as the special prosecutor in this case. The original special prosecutor, Lalaine Briones, recently took another job and is no longer with the PACG.
A motions hearing had been set for 9 a.m. Friday before Senior Judge Jack McLaughlin of DeKalb County, who was brought in when the Cobb State Court judges recused themselves. Busch had sometimes filled in as a judge on the state court bench.
But McLaughlin did not take the bench Friday. Instead, he and lawyers for the defendants spoke behind closed doors until after 11 a.m., when Malone came out and addressed the media.
"I want to make it perfectly clear that this thing has become a celebrated cause, and I understand that," said Malone, who has been a prosecutor in Georgia for 30 years. "It's a serious matter, but we don't want to turn it into something more than that, either. That's how we're trying to balance this."
The agreement does require both women to do "several things" before the October sentencing, "but we haven't signed the papers yet, so I can't tell you what," Malone said. "I'll be happy to comment on this after it is done."
Jimmy Berry, one of the most prominent criminal defense lawyers in Cobb, is representing Busch. His client attended Friday's session, Berry said, but she was kept out of view.
Among the 15 motions Berry filed in Busch's behalf - and which would be moot if the case is resolved - were a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that the charges that were brought ten weeks after the incident were motivated solely by news media stories; a motion for a change of venue, contending that extensive publicity makes it "impossible to secure an impartial jury in this county"; and motions to suppress statements and evidence, arguing that no one was read their Miranda rights and that the police search of the premises and persons "was done without a warrant, without probably cause and amounted to an illegal entry."
Another motion by Berry requests the judge to review the personnel files of all police officers to be called as witnesses, "for evidence of perjurious conduct or other similar dishonesty."
Berry also demands answers for each count of the indictment against his client. The questions he wants answered are: at what time did Busch supply any of the named juveniles with alcohol; exactly which juvenile gave information that Busch provided any alcohol; and exactly how did Busch provide a location for the teens to drink if she was unaware that they were drinking?
Middleton's lawyer, Joel Pugh, of the Marietta firm Pugh, Barrett, Canale & Leslie, also filed motions to dismiss the case and to suppress evidence. Middleton was excused from attending on Friday, Pugh said.
The case files
About 3 a.m. on Dec. 22, Cobb Police were dispatched to the Marietta Country Club neighborhood, off of Stilesboro Road in west Cobb, after a resident reported hearing what sounded like gunshots.
Upon investigating, police found lots of popped balloons in Busch's driveway, and an officer knocked on the door of her Hazeltine Lane home. Another officer checking the back of the house could see beer bottles and cans on a ping-pong table and in the hands of "numerous young looking individuals," according to the police report.
An officer then encountered a youth on the home's deck and asked if there were any adults home and for him to summon them, according to the police report. That's when Middleton appeared at the door with a beer in her hand and "appeared intoxicated," the police report notes.
Middleton returned a few minutes later with Busch, the homeowner, "who also seemed to be very intoxicated," according to the report. "She seemed to not comprehend and continued to ask why we were there. Our presence was explained to her multiple times. ... Ms. Busch stated that she had hosted an adult party earlier and that when it was over she went to bed. She stated that some of the children who had come with their parents were supposed to stay the night."
Busch allowed police to enter her home, where they began talking to the teenagers, the police report states.
State Sen. John Wiles, a Kennesaw Republican, arrived at Busch's home while the police were talking to the teenagers in the basement and using Alco sensors to check for alcohol consumption, according to the police report.
According to the police report, Wiles "stated that he had come to assist Mrs. Busch. Mrs. Busch made it known that Mr. Wiles was a former Cobb County prosecutor and is [now] a state senator. Mrs. Busch had also stated that she was a traffic court judge in Woodstock."
After police cited the teenagers and turned them over to their parents, Officer S. Walton realized one of the juveniles was unaccounted for. Although Busch stated that the teen had left with a parent, police called the teen's mother, who said the teen was not at home and was now very concerned, according to the report.
Solicitor General Barry Morgan's office usually prosecutes misdeameanor offenses, such as minors in possession of alcohol, but Morgan said he recused his office in this case and asked for an outside prosecutor because one of his assistant solicitors attended the Christmas party at the home earlier in the evening.
The teenagers
Four teenagers over age 17 and six juveniles were given citations for underage drinking after police arrived at Busch's home on Dec. 22. Juvenile records are confidential, so it is unclear how those six cases were resolved.
As for the four "adult minors," two had their cases dismissed as part of a diversion program, after they each performed community service, paid a fine, received counseling and passed three drug tests. Charges against one more individual are pending and may not be resolved until October.
The fourth teen, William Maxwell, originally was allowed to enter the diversion program, even though his blood-alcohol level of .171 made him ineligible. An assistant prosecutor had waived the community service requirement when Judge Nancy Campbell refused to allow his baseball practice at Rice University to count toward the requirement.
When his ineligibility for the diversion was discovered, Morgan's office refiled the charge, but a judge dismissed that case, Morgan said, and he did not appeal. Maxwell voluntarily completed 40 hours of community service, Morgan said.












Follow us on Twitter!
What I do not hear any of you mention was the undisputed fact that Ms. Busch misrepresented herself to the court only weeks later regarding any involvement....perhaps a sim of omission, but a sin nonetheless in the eyes of the court. THAT is why I personally think she should be punished.
parents, nobody cares what you have to say. this sort of thing happens all the time. just get over it.
To the defendants: You should hang your head low with shame, but you won't. Your'e proably having a celebatory drink right now. You circumvented the judicial system you swore an oath to uphold. Ms. Busch, you are a criminal along with your buddy Kat.
Additionally, all the parents and adults who were present..You did not come foward to defend Diane, BECAUSE..you are guilty as well. You just went home earlier, and some of you left your kids for the "Sleep-over".
This is not over, as I believe the Attorney Generals Office should look into this as well a the DOJ, which I am sure they will hear and investigate for the majority of the citizens.
Let just start with the average sentence of a male or female with the same charge, but lets say just one count not 20 . I can giv e you a hint, they did time in the Cobb Co Jail, Cherokke Co Jail, ect ect.
They shall!
Gunny
Guess that lesson didn't quite sink in last October...
The "best behaved and upstanding teenagers" whom I know don't break the law. YES - there still are SOME kids who don't drink while underage. These "cool kids" with their "cool parents" act one way to your face and then behave differently behind closed doors.
What would have happened if one of these children had had an accident on the way home? What is someone had been injured? Or worse yet, KILLED? What would all of their supporters be saying now?
It wasn't too long ago that a Harrison High student was killed after a drinking party where the parent was convicted of supplying liquor. I think she ended up in jail. (as well she should have) Those ladies should be thankful that nothing worse happened that evening from their immature behavior. I know - it stinks sometimes to have to be the "grown up" - but too bad.
What did Lindsey Tippins do that was illegal when he was on the school board? Your post tends to suggest this....
Last I knew didn't obstruct justice. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Guess it will be a slap on the hand and back to business as usual.
Now if it would have been a commoner you can bet they would not have had Wiles or Jimmy Berry on their team and they would have been being held in the county jail until the trial.
This stinks worse that the composting facility on County Farm Rd.
I think you may be missing the point commentators are making here because of your proximity to the individuals involved. While the judge may, indeed, have had an exemplary record, and while her children may, indeed, be upstanding young people, the point being made is that unless you have power and funds in this county to "move mountains," you would not be getting the preferential treatment that she and her family got that night and since. True, the incident has gotten repetitive press coverage in the MDJ, but on the other hand, an average citizen would have been taken to jail and charged immediately.
Also, an average citizen in Cobb of modest, or less than modest, means would never be able to hire a lawyer of Mr. Berry's stature who would know how to deflect the charges and possibly keep jail time out of the picture entirely.
Personally, I will be one very angry citizen if I learn that someone I know went to the Cobb jail for a violation far less serious, while Mrs. Busch gets a slap on the wrist for her poor decisions. Did she know her children were continuing to host a party where drinking was going on? Possibly not. But I have raised teenagers. You never, NEVER, NEVER go to bed while they are still up partying and alcohol is available. And you absolutely NEVER become so intoxicated yourself that you cannot monitor their behavior in your home. So yes, she IS responsible for what happened that night, regardless of how Mr. Berry manipulates the technicalities of the law.
If his presentation of the law allows Mrs. Busch to walk away from this situation without the typical sentence, it cannot be for any other reason except that the judge (Mrs. Busch) has received treatment reserved for someone considered outside the bounds of the common people. And I, for one, will be very angry. I may not be important, but I am a citizen, too.
Well written! However after reading I want to thank you for the support of my opinion of the "Norm for the Rich and Famous".
However, you no doubt fit very well within this catergory. Your comments and attitudes fit right in with those who just want to circumvent the judicial system. Her actions did rise to the level of criminal activity.I do understand though for you this wasn't a criminal activity.
Let me tell you my view of the law: If you are accused of violating the law then this is considered criminal activity.
Also lawyers were originally intended to defend the innocent, not to arrange to have the guilty be given different treatment or punitive sanctions, however this is how the judicail system works now. All of are guilty for allowing it to get to this condition.
Finally, members ofthe law enforcement community and the judicail branch of government should be held to a higher accountabilty for violating crimianl laws. One they understood the law and its consequences far more than the average citizen, and second they violated an oath of office that they swore to uphold.
The "children" involved knew better as we try tro classify everyone under 21 as "children", they knew better as well, but then again the worst that could happen is I get a ticket, give to Mom and go to baseball practice as punishment.
Again thank you for supporting my opinion counsel.
Semper Fi
Gunny
At first, to be honest, I thought the judge should not be held to a higher standard. When I mentioned this to a group of friends, who are all members of the Bar, I was told I was out of my mind....that in their opinion she should be held to a higher standard and that the higher standard is implicit when you take on that role.
Yes, her life and that of many others has been changed forever. However, that is what I tell my children a "consequence" is. I appreciate you trying to defend your friend, but respectfully, this was a situation that got out of hand and was allowed to happen by someone who knew better.