Super's 'So Long'
July 01, 2010 12:00 AM | 1281 views | 22 22 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
COBB COUNTY school Superintendent Fred Sanderson, who played football at UGA and cut his teeth as a coach on the high school level in Cobb, put in a game plan last week that met with the approval of many supporters of the school system: He announced his pending retirement, effective next June.

Sanderson, who has managed to polarize many diverse constituencies of the Cobb system - i.e., parents, teachers, taxpayers, bus drivers, and more - made his announcement at Thursday's board meeting. Though unfailingly warm and gracious on the personal level, he has presided over what has frequently been described as a school administration where deception and deceit have been at the top of the agenda.

Sanderson, a popular career educator in Cobb, was hired in December 2005 to heal the wounds left by his predecessor Joe Redden's bare-knuckled and ultimately unsuccessful attempt to use SPLOST funds to equip each middle and high school student and teacher with a take-home laptop computer. After a soothing start, the Sanderson administration soon found itself falling into many of the same habits as Redden, sparking one controversy after another and keeping the system in near-constant turmoil.

He was barely installed in his new office before getting snared in racial redistricting controversy regarding Hillgrove and McEachern high schools. Things only got worse in 2008 when he hand-picked Dr. Lawrence Bynum for promotion as principal at North Cobb High School, even though Bynum was the target of an ongoing sexual harassment investigation - a fact he withheld from the board, as he eventually admitted to a Cobb grand jury looking into the matter. Even so, the board secretly voted to give Sanderson a two-year contract extension and 14 percent raise.

Such secret votes have been de rigueur during the Sanderson era. Then-board Chairman John Abraham told the MDJ in July 2009 that the school board had voted in secret 55 times, which was a clear violation of the state's Open Meetings Act. Sanderson was present for those meetings and votes, of course. The board continues to violate that law, as was reported by the MDJ last week.

Sanderson last year pulled out all the stops to ensure implementation of an ultra-controversial Standards-Based Report Card for third graders; successfully pushed the system closer to a year-round calendar, to the loud complaints of many parents and others; and waited until the week before the current school year started last August to announce that more than 1,000 bus stops were being eliminated as a cost-saving measure.

Despite plenty of warning, Sanderson seemed unprepared for the deep budget cuts required by the failing economy. Rather than bringing the public into the process, he played it close to the vest. The system ultimately laid off 1,000 teachers - only to, bizarrely, announce a few weeks later that half of them might be rehired.

Meanwhile, a succession of county grand juries released a series of scathing reports about the system and especially its transportation department last fall - news of which Sanderson seemed to take no notice.

Many employees have described a system in which fear and retaliation predominate and where teachers are afraid to speak out. That culture of intimidation might not have originated with Sanderson - but he didn't do anything to reverse it, either.

Moreover, barring a near-miracle between now and next June when Sanderson heads for the locker room, the system likely will still be on the Needs Improvement List under No Child Left Behind, just as it was when he was hired.

***

LIKE REDDEN, SANDERSON has been a victim in part of his own board, which rather than show leadership and provide direction for the superintendent has let him lead it by the nose. Like Redden, Sanderson has sensed a vacuum of power and tried to fill it. As we've noted before, the Georgia Constitution states that all school systems are to be under the "management and control" of the board of education. That Constitution applies in Cobb, too, even though here it's the board that's under the leadership and control of the superintendent.

Cobb's school board has suffered from a number of weak chairmen since the departure of Lindsey Tippins at the end of 2007, with incumbent Chair Lynnda Crowder-Eagle arguably the weakest yet. Her attitude, and that of most of the board, were aptly summarized by member Holli Cash, who memorably attended one meeting dressed in cheerleader togs with pom-poms in hand to root for the super.

While there's talk - and fear - that the current board might race ahead and hire a successor for Sanderson, that job belongs to the new board that takes office after this year's elections. They are the ones who must work with Sanderson's predecessor, and it should be their responsibility to find someone who shares their collective vision for the system and how to implement it.

And as for talk that Deputy Superintendent Dr. Steve Constantino might be tapped to replace Sanderson, that would be a mistake. While his academic bona fides are no doubt in order, he is too closely associated in the public's mind with Sanderson. Hiring him would be akin to the 2005 school board hiring Redden's No. 2 to succeed him. No, what the Cobb system needs is a clean break from the past - and a thorough housecleaning at the headquarters on Glover Street - to make the current culture of "deception and deceit" an unhappy memory. It's time for the healing to begin.
Comments
(22)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
JUST TWO COMMENTS
|
July 08, 2010
First, no one said just b/c Fred gave notice that the "new" board can't FIRE him sooner. Second, the main reason he wants out is that his inability to effectively budget for next year will all come out in the test scores. Ironically, those should be posted right about the time he "retires." How convenient.
Response to Around
|
July 06, 2010
Brock and Clay only THINK they control the CCSD. They are allowed to THINK they control the CCSD because the majority of current board members do not THINK for themselves or consequence B&C for not following the laws--laws for which we all have to abide by as citizens. We have board members, with the exception of Alison Barlet, who do not think, and legal counsel who does not follow the law.

-From Around We Go
In response - Betcha
|
July 06, 2010
If CCSD is run by the Good Ol' Boys, than why is it that the Good Ol' Boys of Cobb are ruining education in Cobb? What is their desired goal and/or motive for ruining education? And if education affects property values, than why are the Good Ol' Boys destroying our property values (Last I looked, they lived in Cobb too and ironically they are inadvertantly destroying the worth of their property too by their actions and/or lack of actions)? What do they have to gain by destroying our property values and hurting our youth?

In their quest for power, they create a dharma of negative leadership which contaminates the "water" from which we all drink--and what is odd is that they fight to be first in line to the fountain.

--From Around We Go
Betcha
|
July 06, 2010
Constantino is Fred's trained monkey, and I'll wager he gets passed the orb and scepter whether or not he's the person for the job. This is still a good ol' boy system, and it's who you know that matters most.
To Around We Go
|
July 05, 2010
If only you knew how right you are about Brock & Clay. They control CCSD and often speak as if they are a part of the CCSD rather than referring to and regarding CCSD as the client. They cleverly create work for themselves which translates into billings that our taxpayer dollars are paying.
positions count
|
July 05, 2010
To the person who suggested simply handing out contracts to all employees with 4 or more years experience, and cutting everyone else: it's not that simple.

The actual certifications and positions needed to be taken into consideration as well. HR had to look at how many teachers were needed for specific areas (ie high school Biology, Sped Learning Disabilities....) and couldn't just look at years of experience.

From a purely financial "business" perspective, that would have worked. Education is not just a business - it is more...
Around we go....
|
July 04, 2010
The problems won't go away in the CCSD until the new board fires Sanderson immediately and fires Brock & Clay immediately. B&C continues to profit by creating chaos within the CCSD and thereby maintains a dependency based on the chaos. The new board members do not need B&C. They need to think for themselves and represent the public.

Also,rewrite the CCSD policy to remove the CEO Linkage System put in place by Redden so that the new super does not have so much control which keeps the system corrupt due to no checks and balances.

Man, could it be any easier folks? Return representation back to the public, and put accountability back in the system which is flawed. Otherwise, the merry-go-round will keep spinning and going no where no matter who the new super is and no matter who the new board members are...

Change the STRUCTURE of the system or have this historic luancy repeat itself...but maybe that is too easy....

As a communication major, I find it interesting how the press keeps focusing on the players and not the etiological problems which could lead to sound solutions for the community at large.
Registered voter
|
July 04, 2010
My vote will be based on who has the most business experience.
just sayin'.....
|
July 04, 2010
While there's talk - and fear - that the current board might race ahead and hire a successor for Sanderson, that job belongs to the new board that takes office after this year's elections. They are the ones who must work with Sanderson's predecessor, and it should be their responsibility to find someone who shares their collective vision for the system and how to implement it.

Read more: The Marietta Daily Journal - Super s So Long

Dear Sir:

I believe the word you were looking for was "successor" NOT "predecessor."
Omar the Begger
|
July 03, 2010
Well so long and thanks for all of the fish.
Bad Business
|
July 02, 2010
Please remember that it was Big Business "to big"

for its britches "to fail" that got the Nation's

and Cobb's economies in the circumstances that

have created this school budget crisis. Surely

you remember the Congress giving them a trillion

bucks and then refusing $23 billion to the schools

to stave off the rifing of teachers and the raising of pupil-teacher ratios. And, like it or

not, Mr. Tippins (a businessman)had a big say in

the hiring of Joe Redden and the return of Fred

Sanderson. Why would anyone think that a BoE

made up exclusively of business people would be

a solution to our current woes? Tippins was smart

enough to go teflon and get out before it got

to the fan. Now that he has avoided the fall out

he can pick up his political career in another

venue, which would not have been possible had

he stayed on the BoE. He would be biting the

bullet with the rest of 'em.
businessman
|
July 02, 2010
and you think that working a household budget is anything like running a business budget?? Well, then, that answers our question now doesn't it? You haven't a clue, like so many have pointed out.
to anonymous
|
July 02, 2010
Obviously, if anonymous believes that teachers

have no real world experience with budgets, he's

never had to live on a teacher's salary and had

to work 2 or 3 other jobs to afford the answering

of his calling. He's as full of IT as most anonymouses seem to be. Just what kind of animal

is an Anonymous anyway?
dustoff
|
July 02, 2010
This is a good start, now lets boot out some more of them in the elections!!!!
anonymous
|
July 02, 2010
You have to run the budget side of schools like it is a business, it does have a budget well over 800 million dollars - that is big business. Most teachers and administrators just do not have the real life experience to deal with those types of numbers.

My evidence, look at the current situation. We need a board who implements sound fiscal policies in order that the education of our students does not suffer.

We need to elect business leaders, who have a passion for education, to the board. We just don't need retired teachers who have answered their calling. They have done well and given back to the community but their experience and formal education dealing with budgets has not given them the set of tools which a large school system needs to survive.
RE: I have a ?
|
July 02, 2010
The board has no business sense which is needed when you now there will be a fiscal problem. The board should have given all full time employees contracts who were in their 4th year and above. This would have eliminated initial contracts for half day and 1-3 year teachers. After the ten day period, the county would have know who was leaving and how many spots they had open. From there, they could give out the rest of the contracts accordingly. Instead, they cost the county taxpayers more money and much unneeded stress for the teachers. This board still does not understand how to run this huge county. They already are well aware that next year will be different but are not making any plans on how to cover the shortage. WHat a shame! They need to hire Emily Lembeck from Marietta City Schools! I think it is time to hire a woman!
Problem's Problem
|
July 01, 2010
The problem with the problem is that he thinks

education is a business. Real teachers know it

is a calling. The real problem with him and the

BoE is that none of them seem to know this. If

they did the CCSD would not be in this current

flux. They are all so totally disconnected from

the rank and file(teachers/students)they've

rendered themselves worthless to the causes they

swore to fight for. The failure of Mr. Sanderson and the BoE is really about veracity in philosophy, not a business failure.

Alan Faircloth
|
July 01, 2010
If retirements created the openings, then give the public the number of CCSD employees that retired. If there were only 50 retirements....that doesn't fit.
Steve Rhinehart
|
July 01, 2010
A good idea to let the incoming board hire the new super, but with this board's track record of doing the right thing or making intelligent decisions, it is highly unlikely that the decision making will wait. They are, of course, under direct orders from Fred to give the job to his clone, Steve C., so there is no decision involved.

Look for more of the same if that happens.
I have a question
|
July 01, 2010
The MDJ keeps referring to the rehiring of teachers as being a 'bizarre' occurrence when, in fact, it was merely the result of retirements which were declared AFTER the layoffs. How can you fill the vacancies of retiring employees BEFORE you know they are retiring?
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.