Overlooking the Square
Do we need taller buildings there?
by Joe Kirby
Editorial Page Editor
June 17, 2010 05:02 PM | 1097 views | 2 2 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Powerful Councilman Philip Goldstein, whose family is one of the biggest private property owners in downtown Marietta, has announced plans to demolish the empty, nearly century-old Cuthbertson Building on the north side of Marietta Square and replace it with a five-story building. The Cuthbertson Building, and all of the other buildings on that side of the Square other than the Strand Theatre, is two-story buildings.

Not surprisingly, Goldstein’s proposal has many people alarmed, and not just preservationists. They see it as the first step toward a Square ringed with much taller buildings, which would utterly change the character of downtown — and not for the better.

Based on the architectural drawing that appeared in the MDJ of the new building, it seems to have been designed with sensitivity in a style very similar to the building it is replacing. In my opinion, its façade would complement its surroundings — except, of course, for its height.

Leaving aside for the moment such issues as parking, zoning, etc., there is the undeniable possibility that erecting a five-story building there would bring us a big step closer to the day when Goldstein or someone else proposes, and gets approval, for a seven- or eight- or nine-story building facing the Square. Or several such buildings, if the economics would support them. One five-story building on that side of the Square might be tolerable, but not what would likely follow.

My personal opinion, again, is that Marietta’s human-scale Square is what gives it so much of its unique ambience, and that we should think long and hard before eagerly embracing the kind of radical departure that Goldstein is proposing.

What do you think?

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
son of Mencken
|
June 23, 2010
It is morally wrong for any citizen or group of citizens to tell Mr. Goldstein what he can or cannot do with his property.

It is equally wrong for any taxpayer money to subsidize Mr. Goldstein, directly or via loan support, to build on his property.

Mr. Goldstein should be able to build whatever he wants, as long as he spends hi own money to do so.
Dave56
|
June 21, 2010
Human scale is the issue here, well put. The exsisting buildings are in bad shape, granted, but perhaps a 2-3 story building with parking is the better use for the space. Five stories is simply too tall and would completly change the fee of the square.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.