Police chiefs: Ariz. law could increase crime
by Pete Yost
Associated Press Writer
May 27, 2010 12:00 AM | 338 views | 4 4 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
WASHINGTON - Arizona's new immigration law and similar proposals in other states would lead to an increase in crime, some police chiefs from around the country told Attorney General Eric Holder in an hourlong meeting on Wednesday.

The chiefs told the attorney general that having to determine whether a person is in the United States illegally will break down the trust that police have built in communities and will divert law enforcement resources away from fighting crime.

If that happens, "we will be unable to do our jobs," said Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck. "Laws like this will actually increase crime, not decrease crime."

Tucson Police Chief Roberto Villasenor said the requirements of the new law are so burdensome that "we doubt the federal government can even handle the numbers of people we will bring to them" on immigration status.

The new law "puts Arizona law enforcement right in the middle" at a time when police budgets are already in crisis, said John Harris, president of the Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police.

On Monday, the FBI reported that both violent crime and property crime dropped dramatically last year, a trend the police chiefs said could be imperiled if immigration is added to law enforcement's responsibilities.

The Obama administration is weighing a possible court challenge to the Arizona law and "the attorney general said he would be making decisions fairly quickly," though he did not elaborate, said Harris, who is police chief in Sahuarita, Ariz.

The chiefs, who spoke to reporters after the hourlong meeting with Holder, said the subject of filing a lawsuit never came up.

Holder has expressed reservations about the new law, saying it could lead to racial profiling. Three weeks ago, the Justice Department's civil rights division head told some Arizona leaders that DOJ staff is analyzing the potential effects of the new state law.

The other police chiefs in the meeting were from Philadelphia, Houston, Minneapolis, San Jose, Salt Lake City and Montgomery County, Md.

Arizona immigration law empowers police to question anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally. It faces five lawsuits, including two from individual police officers, and two people filed paperwork this week to begin gathering signatures for separate ballot measures opposing the law.

Two previous proposals for ballot measures were abandoned, one because backers weren't confident they could win the issue in November. The other was scrapped because its backers feared voter support for the law would trigger constitutional protections and prevent future changes by lawmakers.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Ltriddle
|
January 22, 2011
My wife is from Venezuela, she has been here 12 years and has a current green card. We have been dilligent while trying to gain her full citizenship, but the current bureaucratic system is so corrupt and broken, the government makes it almost impossible to attain. We all came from somewhere else, unless you are full blooded native american. I would like to see any of you go through the process, then you would realize why so many have no other choice but to remain "Illegal". I could not agree more that if you came to this country with illegal intent, you should be deported, maybe we should clear the prisons and send them all to Chavez!
April M.
|
August 29, 2010
This is nonsense. What kind of logic is this?!? Once again, the bleeding hearts want to look the other way while MILLIONS of illions cross our borders illegally, set up shop, drop their anchor babies, and welch off the American taxpayer. Americans are fed up!

ENFORCE THE LAWS AND ENACT E-VERIFY! DEPORT THEM ALL!!!!!!!!
Cayita
|
August 11, 2010
Racial profiling, baloney. (1) Entering this country illegally or staying here illegally is a crime. Enforcing these laws FINALLY would not take away from fighting crime. It would just give a little more crime to fight initially. (2) Discounting police chiefs who don't want to tackle a tough job, if you need to hire more officers, do it. Appeal for grants if need be. Or train volunteer cops who would have the same authority and experience of any paid police person. (3) I'm certain there would/will be a significant drop in crime, violent crimes, as illegals are carted back to Mexico or locked up here. Just like with the rest of us Americans, drugs = crime. Duh. (4) Let's clean house and enjoy and celebrate the wonderful, law abiding Mexicans in our midst. (5) Lastly, "Washington, back off. Mind your own business and stop trying to encroach on the rights of individual states. We're looking more communist every day.
Indian Joe
|
May 27, 2010
I love it when those who are supposed to "enforce the law", find reasons why some aspects of laws should be enfored, but others should not. Not surpirsed that Los Angeles police chief would be opposed to this law - but then what does he have to do with Arizona. Truth of the matter is he is probably afraid more illegals will leave Arizona and come to California - where I personally believe they all should be shipped. The law is the law, if Arizona passed the law, it should be enforced. Period, end of story. Otherwise to enforce any other laws is selective prosecution.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.