Hospital tax: Lawmakers choose to tax sick, not smokers
by The Savannah Morning News
May 17, 2010 12:00 AM | 874 views | 6 6 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
It's disappointing that Georgia lawmakers and Gov. Sonny Perdue would rather tax sick people than tax consumption of the things that make them sick.

That's backward.

People can choose whether to partake of items that may cause illnesses. They usually don't have a choice whether to have an operation to remove a tumor.

However, maybe there's a method to the legislature's and governor's cockeyed madness.

In supporting a hospital "bed tax" over a proposed $1-a-pack tax hike on a pack of cigarettes, perhaps state officials figured they'd still get the money they needed to help balance the budget. It's a matter of which pocket you take it from.

Instead of raking it on the front end from countless smokers at the cash register, lawmakers and the governor figured they'd collect it on the back end from a small number of hospitals - which, after all, are treating many of these same people for smoking-related illnesses.

It's clean and neat. This tax collection method may be politically safer, too. Hospitals don't vote. But many people who smoke Marlboros and Camels do.

Unfortunately, the numbers still don't add up.

The bed tax, which Mr. Perdue signed into law Wednesday, will generate $90 million. State Rep. Ron Stephens (R-Savannah), who championed the cigarette tax hike, estimated that raising the state's cigarette tax from a piddly 37 cents per pack to $1.37 would bring in $350 million.

Better yet, as smokers cut back, the state's Medicaid program could see a projected $537 million in savings by treating fewer patients with smoking-related illnesses. A sick tax has no extra benefit.

There's an old saying: You can pay me now, or you can pay me later. By taxing the sick - a cost that will be passed along to all patients and their insurers - Georgia's leaders chose poorly.
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
wwh
|
May 18, 2010
why not tax both? While to some it may seem logical to tax unhealthy behavior like smoking, it is illogical to build budgets and spending programs around a revenue stream based on that undesirable, unhealthy behavior. The hospital tax would provide a much more reliable and predectible revenue source while a hearty cigarette tax could raise revenue temporarily while serving as a disincentive stamp out smoking.
Meanie
|
May 18, 2010
Why not tax obesity? It is a national problem, and leads to many many illnesses and costly medical treatment. We could start out with a gradual tax which increases as you gain more, or get older. Let's not forget, the projected new revenue for $1.00 a pack tax is just that - projected and when has any government accountant or politician accurately projected anything when it has to do with money? So you colelct .39 from each of 4 smoker - you collect $1.56 - if 3 quit smoking because they can no longer afford it - you collect $1.39 - a loss of revenue. Or every smoker can quit - no revenue at all. But then, the quitters can always take up pot (no tax at all) and pretty soon will be cheaper than regular tobacco.
Dustoff
|
May 17, 2010
One more government feebie for the illegals!!!
Cobb teacher/parent
|
May 17, 2010
It boggles my mind to see how the State Legislature operates. First, by not raising the cigarette tax, they abandon a money-making measure that makes perfect sense (discouraging people from partaking in an unhealthy habit, which will also lower health care costs. Meanwhile, they pass unnecessary tax cuts for the elderly (elimination of the income tax on the elderly over the next 5 years - even for those who make $70 thousand or more per year)that will cost the state several hundred million dollars over that period. They do this while the state is in its worst financial condition since the Great Depression and teachers are being laid off in droves. At least more people can carry guns on school grounds! Great job legislators!
Ruth Nash
|
May 17, 2010
This is one more example why we need term limits on all political seats in state and federal gov positions. No more career politicions. Trouble is it would have to be put on a ballot because they will never vote themselves out of the special interest and the millions they making poor decisions like this one.
Pat H
|
May 17, 2010
This tax will just allow illegals another free ride, they don't pay health care bills. They give fake names, addresses. But they do buy cigarettes.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.