Performance-based program approved for Marietta schools
by Jon Gillooly
jgillooly@mdjonline.com
April 21, 2010 12:00 AM | 1846 views | 25 25 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA - The Marietta Board of Education unanimously approved a proposal on Tuesday that allows a small group of teachers to participate in a performance-based program to improve student achievement.

Under the program, four teachers made commitments to increase test scores by 7 to 10 percent in their classrooms on either the Criterion Referenced Competency Test or End of Course Test. In return, they were each given $2,000 for supplies to help carry out their strategy for raising scores. If successful, each teacher is eligible for up to $4,000 in federal funding.

Superintendent Dr. Emily Lembeck said she brought the concept forward two years ago, but no teacher was interested at the time.

"I'm very, very excited about it because it's rewarding teachers for innovating, for thinking outside of the box in order to improve student achievement, and although there are some who have concerns about pay-for-performance or performance incentives, I believe that incentivizing people to be innovative and get better results can be a win-win. It's a win for the teachers and of course a win for the students," Lembeck said.

Each of the four teachers is taking a different approach to meet the challenge of raising test scores. For instance, Marietta High School biology teacher Celis Hartley-Lewis plans to recycle defunct laptop computers with the help of the district's technology department so as to provide each student in her class with their own laptop. Marietta High students have access to computer labs and computer carts, but not their own laptops, said Dr. Margaret Sims, who oversees secondary education for the district.

The laptops, Sims said, will allow the biology class to become paperless. Hartley-Lewis will use her $2,000 federally funded stipend to install software on the renovated laptops that allows them to communicate with her own computer, so students can receive more individualized attention from her.

"I hope that some of these innovations, if successful, can be replicated in other classrooms," Lembeck said.

The other three teachers participating are Julie Schunk, at Marietta Sixth Grade Academy; Thomas Monti, at Marietta Middle School, and Stephanie Howard, from Marietta High School.

Also Tuesday, during the public comment part of the meeting, several parents and organization leaders asked the board to not cut certain programs as the school system faces likely reductions in revenue.

Several parents of Marietta High School students spoke of the importance of the high school's band program. Among them was Elise Goldstein, the incoming co-president of the Marietta Band Association, a parent booster organization.

Bridget MacPherson, whose children attend Hickory Hills, urged the board against making any cuts to the arts program at that elementary school. Attorney Tom Cauthorn, speaking on behalf of the Cobb County Youth Museum, spoke of the 40 year relationship between Marietta City Schools and the museum. Lembeck has proposed cutting $5,000 in field trip money to the youth museum for the FY2011 budget.

Lembeck is also proposing the elimination of 42 jobs, increased class sizes, three furlough days and dipping into the rainy day fund as a way to balance the system's fiscal year 2011 budget. The school board is scheduled to adopt the proposed budget for the district on June 15. Based on anticipated reductions from the state and in local property taxes, Lembeck is estimating a $7 million revenue reduction, or 8.9 percent, of the current FY10 $78.9 million budget.

In other business, the board unanimously approved a $41,345 expenditure for a digital editing system for its sports programs. Marietta High School head football coach Scott Burton said in the past, a coach would record the games on VCR, taking notes by hand to record the various plays in preparation for the next game. The digital editing system, called Digital Sports Video, allows coaches to break down games for analysis, take notes on the video, and make cutups and highlights of individual student athletes to be used for recruitment and enhanced performance, he said.
Comments
(25)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
MCS teachers wake up
|
April 23, 2010
What are you all complaining about? Good grief. Forty-three positions, the majority of whom will be reabsorbed. No cuts to arts. Supporting your teachers and coaches with technology. Coaches who teach academic subjects and tutor. You all are so fortunate. Try working for Cobb County Schools where individuals and purchases are not considered, and where our SPLOST money is going for turf not resources. Many of the CCSD employees found out they were losing their jobs via email. This article reads like a dream system compared to CCSD. Im not intimidated by performance reviews, as I want my performance to be individually evaluated and valued. Truly, teachers in MCS dont really realize how good they have it. Want to trade jobs?
Other Coach
|
April 23, 2010
It is great that Marietta has coach Burton.

MHS won't be a problem for us to beat again this year. I own all his Coaches-choice instructional DVDs and know what he's teaching his players.

BTW if you wanna know what other money he may want to spend...study up!
What the!?
|
April 23, 2010
The odd thing is that the board approved the hiring of the coach on March 2nd. The initial bid from DVS for the editing software came in on March 4th.

Wow, that was fast. And fishy.

Considering that the rep from DVS, Mike Roark is not the rep for our region. He's the Eastern region director. The region where Burton was before he came here. Georgia has another rep. Seems this deal was in the works long before anyone actually got hired.

The other bids all came in over 2 weeks later.

Kinda like an afterthought.

Just like DSV's amendment to the original bid that finally included accommodations for basketball and baseball.

Like I said...I hope the coaches can use this software to help them achieve their playoff bonuses and that the increased game attendance due to outstanding players increases their cut of the gate proceeds.

reader researched
|
April 22, 2010
The Marietta Schools Foundation may have helped pay for the athletic enhancements but after going to their website to really understand their purpose, here's what it said:

"The Marietta Schools Foundation was incorporated in June 1983 for the purpose of promoting educational achievement and excellence among the students, faculty and staff of the Marietta City Schools. The foundation recognizes and rewards outstanding students, teachers, and administrators, and establishes funding guidelines and procedures in order to respond to the specific needs of teachers and administrators."

Maybe I missed the athletics part....but it seems that the foundation could have found a better use of their contribution portion.

Foundation
|
April 22, 2010
Maybe the Foundation should spend the money to keep a teacher. I teach at West Side and will not give anymore money to Marietta Foundation.
Basement Blogger
|
April 22, 2010
It doesn't matter where the money came from. Is it not possible for the "foundation and other private sources" to raise money to help overcome the shortfall which causes teacher cuts, larger class sizes, and increased furlough days? We continue to make teaching less attractive to the highest quality candidates by putting too much emphasis on things that aren't really a part of the educational process. Once again, our priorities are in the wrong order which sends the wrong message to parents, students, teachers, and potential teachers.
anonymous
|
April 22, 2010
Having attended the board meeting Tuesday night, I am saddened by the ignorance out there.
Mad-one
|
April 22, 2010
This is an interesting program and I support it in concept. However a true test of "pay for performance" would include a salary reduction for failure to meet the goal. It does not appear that there is downside risk here. Therefore, it's just a reward paid for increased scores which may be due in part to chance and outside factors over teaching excellence and innovation.
Herewegoagain-
|
April 22, 2010
All you bloogers show yourselves to be such FOOLS!!!! If any of you read the minutes or were in attendance, you would know the sports video equipment came mostly from The Schools Foundation and other private sources. A BIG THANK YOU to Neil Barfield and the entire Schools Foundation!!!

As for all you uninformed bloggers- it's time to get dressed and move out of your mother's basement!!!!
Just Plain Mad
|
April 22, 2010
Have we gone completely mad? Forty one thousand dollars for video editing system for football while eliminating teachers, adding larger class sizes and furlough days? What a gross misuse of public funds! Is it any wonder that that the europeans and orientals are leaps and bounds ahead of us in education? Our emphasis is on the wrong things. We have a board and superintendent that would rather promote a sport that teaches violence and hurting others rather than spending money on education. They should change their name to the Marietta Board of Athletics and Non-education.
Shocked!
|
April 22, 2010
What a sad state of affairs that the Marietta Board of Education chooses to put more emphasis on buying a video toy for coaches rather than save one teaching position with the same money. Most schools in other countries choose not to spend anything on athletics. Instead, they put all of their resources on education, rather than extracurricular activities, which they consider to be a distraction rather than an asset. I wonder how many teaching jobs could be saved if all coaches were eliminated. Maybe we ought to choose to learn from the schools throughout the rest of the world who by the way do produce a much better product than the US.
Part of the story
|
April 22, 2010
MDJ, It would be helpful for you to print the whole story. I was at the board meeting and I heard Dr. Lembeck thank the Schools Foundation, Alumni Association, and Coca-Cola for the funding for the athletic department. As a parent at the high school, I attend the board meetings. I wish more did. At the last meeting, I heard a teacher from the high school complaining about being required to go to technology training to learn to use all the technology she has been provided so the teachers are not doing without.. Our coaches should not be different. I appreciate our school system reaching out into the community as much as possible for the funding of extra-curriculars, but even if private funding had not been secured, the athletic department should receive the technology they need to do their jobs. Lastly, I appreciated the opportunity for the arts parents to be heard and I appreciate that our district is making a decision to safeguard our performing programs at our one high school. THANK YOU!!!

Oh yeah and by the way, our arts teachers have also received technology upgrades this year.
teacher2kidzNfla
|
April 21, 2010
Excuse me, but who wouldn't be able to get better results with an extra $2,000 in school supplies? Compare that to the $170 we got in our district. That included everyone, like new teachers and those changing subjects such as going from Language Arts to Math or Science in Middle Schools. You get asked to take a new subject on, then they give you nothing to teach with. Usually, you start out with nothing and build on your teaching supplies for years.
noway21
|
April 21, 2010
Merit pay is a joke. Many students dont want to learn and do not care. Teachers would get punished for these students. My wife is a teacher at the Middle School and she tells me about these students. By the way,these students are the majority,ask any teacher
HAHA22
|
April 21, 2010
$41,345 for a digital editing system. Let us get rid of the board please!!!!!!!
reader thinks
|
April 21, 2010
It seems that every decision/vote is 7-0 for most items that Lembeck presents. Why doesn't anyone ever challenge or vote against. Does Lembeck have this much power over the school board? Not everything she presents is good and needs to have someone question her. It's rare when anyone goes against her recommendations. I've attended many of these meetings and there is normally little discussion, rarely any disagreements. It would be refreshing to have some actual discussion.
What's up
|
April 21, 2010
When are we hiring the new strength coach?
OnceAgain2
|
April 21, 2010
If this was "brought forward" two years ago, no one I know in the district heard about it.

I do know one of the teachers receiving this, and she is an EXCEPTIONAL teacher.
Thank you-
|
April 21, 2010
We love our Marietta City School System!!!
John Q
|
April 21, 2010
Why no mention in the MDJ about Sonny's backroom shuffle to add a slick merit pay supporting amendment to SB 521?
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.