Major bus barn problems denied
by Kathryn Dobies
kdobies@mdjonline.com
April 15, 2010 12:00 AM | 1832 views | 17 17 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA - More than a month after the grand jury reported "serious issues" with the Cobb County School District's transportation department, those leaders responded by denying there are any major problems that have not already been addressed.

Dr. Gordon Pritz, associate superintendent of operational support, who oversees the district's transportation department, read a brief overview of the district's responses to the grand jury's recommendations. On March 4, the grand jury itemized 16 "serious issues/bad management practices" including poor record keeping; lack of work instructions for mechanics; lack of a defect analysis being performed, which could help identify preventative maintenance opportunities; unsafe lifts in use in the mechanics shops; and school bus fire extinguishers that did not have pins or were low on chemicals. Grand jurors also took issue with the management style of Rick Grisham, the district's transportation chief.

But in the document written by Grisham and submitted to Pritz on April 2, a copy of which was handed out at Wednesday's meeting, "CCSD denied the suggestion the management style of the Transportation Department is not striving" to be effective and efficient.

"The Grand Jury did not afford Mr. Grisham the opportunity to discuss his leadership style nor did they meet with any of his leadership team to gain their insights and perspective on this topic," Grisham wrote. "Mr. Grisham and his leadership team have a high but realistic expectation for, not only their own job performance but all employees in the Transportation Department."

On the lack of work instructions for mechanics, Grisham wrote: "Mechanics are trained and hired based on their abilities to complete appropriate fleet maintenance without written instructions," but also that staff will begin to develop written instructions as needed.

On the inaccurate and incomplete maintenance records, Grisham notes that his office has been correcting its organization and accuracy of such records since January 2009, when the state education department complained about the disorganization. Grisham also notes that though his office provided 31 records to the grand jury, it reviewed only one.

Grisham was present at Wednesday's school board meeting, but he did not speak directly to the board on this issue. Instead, his boss, Pritz, spoke to the board about the grand jury response.

"Leadership change often brings new and different ways of operating" Pritz said. "Over the last two-and-a-half years this change was implemented, in part, due to serious cost issues and operation inefficiencies. While safety of students is always priority, transportation leadership has implemented changes in the spirit of protecting the financial assets of the school district and taxpayer dollars. The results have included a deliberate, methodical transition of long-time practices, staff reductions due to downsizing or performance and improved operations and costs savings."
Comments
(17)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Alan Faircloth
|
April 18, 2010
Graziano - neither are you an omnipotent entity and in fact, unless you were part of the Grand Jury, you know far less than they do....and yet you question their opinions and conclusions despite have less facts and less knowledge. Interesting. I prefer to take the GJ's word here.
anonymous
|
April 16, 2010
Grow up GG...too many people are complaining about CCSD. If the complaints were coming in from one side or the other then you might have a point. But when the accusations are coming in from ALL sides you have to question their validity and I have to say I doubt CCSD has much left of their legs to even be standing.
GG Graziano
|
April 16, 2010
The point is the grand jury is not an omnipotent entity. In it's short period all it points to is a small sample of things and then it is up to someone else to take it from there. A Grand Jury will indict people all the time, but sometimes those same people are acquitted by a real criminal/civil jury. So just because a grand jury says they think there is a problem does not mean there is. It is a perception of these people on the grand jury are all knowing and they really are not. I look forward to that beat down, then the jury can apply aggravated assault laws. Have a great weekend
anonymous
|
April 16, 2010
Graziano you are a fool! Talk about uneducated or mentally challenged
Alan Faircloth
|
April 16, 2010
Mr. Graziano, I refer you to today's guest column by Jackie Inclan. And what is wrong with a homemaker? My wife, formerly a teacher, is now a homemaker....I will be glad to let you meet her and make that statement to her and then I will sit back watching and laughing at the beat down you receive. Your mother was likely a homemaker also. Did you intend to demean her as well? Your lack of respect and degredation of people of certain educational levels and life choices is disgusting and offensive.
Billie Cooling
|
April 16, 2010
dear gg g,First it was disgruntled employees making a stink about "poor"mr.grisham and the transportation department.Now,it's the past grand jury that's to blame for his problems.There's always a fall guy with grisham,never him. as for the slur about the grand jury being uneducated and having no experience in management,how much do you have to know to call a snake a snake,or a liar a liar.for those of us that are homemakers and blonde,it's not rocket science.
GG Graziano
|
April 16, 2010
Why does everyone think that just because someone on a grand jury says something they have all the facts? The grand jury members could be 3rd grade drop outs and still get called. Do they have any experience or expertise in operations management or just a homemaker listening to unhappy people trying to get their 15 minutes?
Mary Stevens
|
April 16, 2010
Just a technical question - who investigates grand juries? This one appears to have had ulterior motives and one could say was out of control. Very concerning.
YELLOW CHEESE
|
April 15, 2010
hey' board member"s u may need to check with the city of atlanta. schools system. thay turned over

there school buses maint. [outsourced] to laidlaw

within 2 years the buses was in such bad shape ect

thay brought the maint back in house! it cost $ 10 millon dollars. to get them buses back up and running! and guess what school system mechanic's

thay call to repair them on the weekend ect to get then in shape! yes your cobb co bus mechanic's

so befor u sell u better think a little!
anonymous
|
April 15, 2010
BULL-HOCKEY!!!
Intimidated
|
April 15, 2010
Bus drivers are still afraid to speak out publicly. Probably 99% of the drivers are driving a bus, because they need the job and the benefits. You don't drive a school bus just for jollies or the great pay. ANYONE who drives a school bus is putting themselves and their families at risk of being sued if anyone decides to do so. School systems & bus drivers in GA do not have the immunity that state & local gov't employees have.
Let's hear all sides
|
April 15, 2010
Just because the Grand Jury states there's possibly an issue, that does not necessarily mean that there is, as some of you state, definitely an issue. Remember that the Grand Jury is convened merely to "determine whether there is probable cause..." (ABA). Probable is a lot different than definite; so, just because the Grand Jury found that there might be probable cause, that doesn't mean that there is a "fire". The Grand Jury merely looks at the evidence given by the prosecution and is not convened to determine guilt; in this case, they only got the one side, and did not review all of the materials that they were given. So, What we have here is a group of people who were charged with looking solely at one side of the case and to produce a report; their report, no matter how many issues it may have identified, is not a "final word" on the matter, nor is it to be taken as an indication of the guilt of anyone - suspected criminals who have been indicted by Grand Juries are acquitted every day based on evidence that proves innocence of the charges. Until we get to have all of the facts, that is still a possibility - not only that, it is the basis of our judicial system, the presumption of innocence until PROVEN guilty.
Here we go again
|
April 15, 2010
Yea right...looks like the fox did the investigation in the hen house...give me a break if the grand jury say's there's a problem then there is a PROBLEM...your either in Denial or trying to cover it up.......Oh yea speaking of problems..can someone tell me why the Field Cordinator's are taking home their Bus Driver's Time Cards...I think we have a privacy issue when paperwork of anykind is taken away from the workplace also posible ID Theft....also while your outsourcing the bus drive's be sure to outsource the Management as well.....can't wait for the next episode of "AS THE BUS WHEEL TURN'S".
Clive Farquar
|
April 15, 2010
Lucy, take a bromo seltzer and relax. This grand jury is the one that did the investigation. They saw one report and talked to nobody in leadership in order to get "all sides". Not sure how much one gets paid to be on the grand jury but those with an axe to grind, including anybody on this one (now that their lack of effort has been revealed), got there money's worth. Maybe other grand juries in the future will do the public a favor and have fewer grandstanders and will be more interested in investigating all areas of an issue and not just those that produce the results that they want.
Forrest Gump
|
April 15, 2010
My momma always said that "Denial is not just a river in Egypt."
Lucy W
|
April 15, 2010
Disgusting -

I don't know anything about the bus problems. I know we have wonderful drivers and with only a few exceptions (break downs), we have had a wonderful experience.

HOWEVER, if the grand jury finds there are problems, then you have someone other then the one accused of causing the problems investigate.

This was just an excuse presentation - I'm feeling really sick!

East Cobb
|
April 15, 2010
It should not take 2 1/2 years to fix record keeping. Stop making excuses and do the job or find another profession. More crap from the central office to the board. Outsource the job to folks who know how to manage transportation.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.