IQ is 'the 500-pound gorilla' in education reform
April 09, 2010 12:00 AM | 666 views | 13 13 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DEAR EDITOR:

It is always a pleasure to see guest columnist Rod Paramoure in the MDJ. I don't recall ever disagreeing with anything he has written. And I heartily applaud his latest opus ("Save our 'failing' schools from federal takeover," Monday's MDJ).

I only have one quibble with his excellent column on education - the omission of any mention of IQ, the 500-pound gorilla that is in any room where the forensics of education take place. It is the thing that accounts for the intractable "gap" that the loony lefties are determined to close.

IQ is hugely important. It is by far the largest single determinant of success in school, and in life. It is immutable, written in stone, and for that reason, the mere mention of it in polite company is PC poison; taboo. The rare times when the subject is broached, it is usually posited that family structure and financial situations dictate success in school, or even IQ scores. The opposite is true. It is a chicken/egg argument.

It would be just so wonderful if we could all be Steven Hawkings, or Michelangelos, or Mozarts. We can't. IQ prevents it. However, there's a place and a reason for every person on earth. Every student needs to have the best chance at success his community is able to offer. Education is highly important, but it is not rocket science. People were learning very well 100 years ago from teachers who knew their subjects, but who also had autonomy over their domains. If they simply had the power to eject troublesome students, their overall product would see an immediate rise in the test scores of the remaining students.

The fear of the 500-pound gorilla, otherwise known as Political Correctness, is moving the entire Christian, Western Civilization towards faceless, powerless, spineless and uniform obeisance to the all-knowing, all-powerful State. It's a tired act that has been done to death in Russia, Cuba, China, and despite its hideousness, is soon coming to our town.

Harry Hagan
West Cobb
Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
OMIPS
|
April 12, 2010
Mr. Hagan,

What you're speaking to was one of the unexpected discoveries of Mr. Johnson's 'Great Society' which set forth with the goal of ensuring that every American would be a success. We've now spent fifty years trying to make up that success gap through social engineering. All we've accomplished is to destroy the public school system and rob several generations of American school children of a first class education. All in the name of equality and political correctness.

Our Man in Powder Springs
Harry Hagan
|
April 12, 2010
"Privileged" thinks he has found evidence of white superiority in my letter. He has not.

I merely maintain that IQ is a guide that should not be unPC to discuss in open forae.

I very well understand that the white agerage IQ is 100. Asian is 106. It is the averages of some other groups that causes the problems. The problem is the ceaseless attempt to close a gap that is unclosable.
face the truth
|
April 10, 2010
Political Correctness is going to be the undoing of this country.
Kniw The Truth
|
April 10, 2010
To Privileged, Harry never mentioned race. Ask yourself why you believed it was implied. Ask yourself why you thought higher IQ meant white? Ask yourself why you thought "troublesome students" were non-white? All I read was that we cant treat everyone as intellectual equals when they are not. Why do you feel it necessary to read race into everything? Oh, I know, without the "race card" you would have to stand on your own merits - like the Stanford students.
mk-
|
April 10, 2010
The gorilla is taking an 'english as a 2nd language' class.
A. Palled
|
April 09, 2010
I really fail to see the point of this letter. Is it the writer's contention that students who don't fare well on an IQ test be booted from school? Does he believe that intelligence is rooted in genetics?

What kind of IQ test does he feel should be used? Which edition? Which model?

Social Scientists and Psychologists have been debating the validity of IQ tests since the turn of the last century. They are anything but "written in stone" indicators of intelligence or potential. "But," Mr Hagan will reply, "the social sciences are just filled with loony liberals."

The letter really seemed to tilt towards some kind of belief in eugenics - and we all know down what sad road that leads.

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of the letter rests in his idea that "things" were somehow better 100 years ago. Yes, what glorious times though were in Georgia...African Americans not allowed to receive anything beyond a primary education (if that), women being limited to domestic education, and the industrialist's factories being filled with 12 and 13 year old workers (that is until those pesky progressives came and ruined everything).

Oh wait, I get it...that was the point of the letter.
Indian Joe
|
April 09, 2010
This is all very true - and the problem has come in large part from the idea that "everyone is entitled to a college education" - like - remember "everyone should be able to own their own home" - and what did that get us? Disaster. The emphasis seems to be on, again, making everyone equal, the PC that no student should feel inferior to another other student and hence the social promotions until finally a child graduates from high school who is reading at a 4 or 5th grade level, and can manage almost no math at all. The feds in education is to blame for the position our schools are now in, and the inability of teachers to teach those who want to learn because everyone has to be treated the "same" regardless of ability or desire to learn. I for one beieve it is time to re-adjust our eductional system, and in fact, our entire political system to represent the true facts of the matter - all people are not the same" - all are entitled to certain rights under the Bill of rights - but when does the time come to speak out on the fact that some ofRC their rights are denying and infringing on someone elses rights.
Privileged
|
April 09, 2010
Let's consider a set of facts that might burst the bubble of Harry's white-superiority argument---the undertones of which are clearly evident in his letter. First, America's elite universities---where students have disproportionately high IQ scores and SAT scores---have disproportionately non-white student bodies. Stanford is an on-point example that muddies the Harry's argument. A comparison of average scores of Georgia and Stanford students finds the average Stanford student w/ an IQ score 30 points higher and SAT scores >40% higher. [Might not a significant portion of the Georgia-Stanford discrepancy be attributable to primary-secondary educational environment?] And Harry, Stanford has been a majority-minority institution for more than a decade. You might rationalize that the discrepancy results from Stanford cherry-picking the best---but you would have to conclude that "the best" aren't necessarily white.
Pat H
|
April 09, 2010
I also agree. The students who do poorly are often the product of parents who did poorly. It may not always be purely IQ, but lack of motivation acquired from family environments where success is not important, easier to have a couple of kids and get the check, food stamps, Section 8, EITC, and heaven knows what else. You cannot learn if you do not show up for school, you do not do your assignments or make your very best effort to learn the material presented.
mk-
|
April 09, 2010
i thought it was 1000 lb goriila
Retiree1
|
April 09, 2010
Absolutely right. But the liberals have already tried (and continue to try) to denigrate the whole idea of IQ, saying the concept is "racist". There are also so-called experts that espouse "emotional IQ" and other forms of "intelligence" that will include all low performing students. After all, the most important thing in education these days seems to be instilling "self esteem" even when it is not earned or deserved.

It really is pretty depressing.
OMIPS
|
April 09, 2010
Amen
Agree
|
April 09, 2010
Agree with you Harry, but the gorilla I remember weighs 800 lbs, not 500
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.