Ga. to get $122M for low-achieving schools
by the Marietta Daily Journal staff
April 07, 2010 01:00 AM | 2121 views | 11 11 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
ATLANTA - U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan announced Tuesday that Georgia will receive more than $122 million to turn around its persistently lowest achieving schools through the School Improvement Grants program. These funds are part of the $3.5 billion that will be made available to states this spring from money set aside in the 2009 budget and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

The $122,815,607 is being distributed by formula to Georgia and will then be competed out by the state to school districts.

School districts applying for the funds must have a state-identified "persistently lowest achieving" or a Tier III school, which is a school that has failed to meet annual yearly progress for two years.

Georgia's application, which includes its list of persistently lowest achieving schools, as defined by the state, can be found at www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/ summary/index.html.

Cobb County School District has six schools on the list. They are Cooper, Tapp, Griffin, and Smitha Middle Schools; Osborne High School; and the Devereux Academy.

Only one Marietta City School is on the list: Marietta's Sixth Grade Academy.

School districts will apply to the state for the funds this spring. When school districts apply, they must indicate that they will implement one of four models in their persistently lowest achieving schools: the turnaround, restart, school closure or transformation model.

Once schools receive SIG funds, they will be able to begin to spend them immediately to turn around schools this fall. States may apply to the Education Department for a waiver to allow them to spend funds over a three-year period. An additional $545,633,000 has been provided for SIG in 2010 and will be awarded to states to fund additional schools in the 2011-12 school year. The department has also made a request for an additional $900 million for the program in the 2011 budget.
Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
It's My Fault
|
April 11, 2010
No one. Repeat no one. Is prepared for the cuts coming our way in Cobb.

A $138,000,000 cut is the equivalent of closing 5 High Schools.

We are screwed.

Crooks and the School Board are the tools turning the screws.

They all must go.

cobb resident
|
April 09, 2010
Money really isn't the problem for underachieving schools. If that was the problem, there wouldn't be any under performing schools in Cobb County. Student involvement, parent involvement, in short changing the culture of those being served. That's a tall order for one school, well-funded or not. Not to mention the self-selection of underachievers to underachieving schools which is facilitated by no child left behind...
mk-
|
April 09, 2010
To all the poor folks w/ no career, education or means of support- QUIT HAVING CHILDREN THAT YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO TAKE CARE OF!!

... and frankly, I don't care if anyone agrees w/ me or not!
exposure
|
April 09, 2010
been there says:

"the children in low performing schools have not had the exposure to the outside world like the children from other parts or the affluent parts of the county have. On CRCT tests vocabulary is used that these children have not ever been exposed to, vocabulary that is learned from exposure and hands on knowledge throughout their lives."

So, been there is saying that kids will not perform well on the CRCT if they've not been exposed to the language used in the questions. Is the test biased against the poor?

And, what kind of exposure is this money going to give these kids-how will the funds be used to target this necessary exposure? How do schools plan for that exposure??
been there
|
April 09, 2010
To MK --- you don't know until you have been in a low performing school. I am certain, by the way you talk, your children have only been in high performing schools. Like Southcobbteacher wrote, the children in low performing schools have not had the exposure to the outside world like the children from other parts or the affluent parts of the county have. On CRCT tests vocabulary is used that these children have not ever been exposed to, vocabulary that is learned from exposure and hands on knowledge throughout their lives. They need to be given the opportunity for this exposure just like other kids are. Believe me the children in the affluent schools in Cobb are given much, much more than children in schools in South Cobb through their own PTA funds and wealthy parents.
anonymous
|
April 08, 2010
I agree with MK - we are wasting so much on the bottom tier and neglecting the top tier.

So sad again!
I want more info.
|
April 08, 2010
The money will go to failing schools willing to take up one of

four dramatic reforms: firing the entire staff, converting into a

charter school, replacing just the principal or closing entirely.

The "school improvement grant" program is designed to help states raise achievement at their worst schools." Is Cobb willing to receive this money knowing that the district will have to implement at least one of the four reforms listed above? I would love to know the answer to this from the Board and the Superintendent.
southcobbteacher
|
April 08, 2010
Not all poor schools are failing schools. Many of the children at low-performing schools do not have the same life outside of schools than their counterparts on the other side of the county. It's about time MORE resources went to help the most needy. You can't spread resources equally across this county and expect the same results. How do I know? 13 years at an at-risk school (not one that is mentioned) and raised 4 children through Cobb County Schools (at high-performing schools).
Robert Jessee
|
April 07, 2010
SO WHERE is the"Billions" from the lottery for Ga. schools,let see where did they hide that money just more of YOUR TAXPAYER money wasted
To mk
|
April 07, 2010
Amen, mk! I'm tired of my tax dollars paying for students who will never exceed expectations. We need to realign our priorities.
mk- $$$$ talks!
|
April 07, 2010
Paying folks for failure-- that's the American way!! Instead,.. how 'bout reward the GOOD schools to give more incentive to failing schools to becoming a GOOD SCHOOL!
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.