Cobb school district has created inequities
March 19, 2010 01:00 AM | 1697 views | 14 14 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DEAR EDITOR:

For the record, I am an ardent supporter of putting artificial turf on all of the Cobb County High School athletic fields. Based on experience, even if the economics make turf a little more expensive than grass, the benefits of having a safe playing field for all activities (athletic and academic) make putting down the turf a good bet for the schools. Several schools in Cobb County already have turf (McEachern, Harrison, Walton, and Lassiter), either because these schools are situated in wealthier districts or are the beneficiaries of a huge endowment.

Here is where the problem lies. Schools in the Wheeler, Pebblebrook, Osborne, South Cobb etc., districts are not in areas where there is a population that can mobilize money for such projects. It certainly would be easy to argue that the folks in the districts that have turf (and a lot of other things like Jumbotron scoreboards, etc.) just work harder than folks in the other schools. While that argument makes people feel good about themselves, it's not the truth and we all know it.

Through poor planning, caving in to pressure from wealthier areas, and some blatant racial politics; the CCSD has allowed gross inequities to occur regarding both athletic facilities and facilities in general. In the case of Wheeler High School, the issue carries over to general academic facilities.

Over the past 15 years, Walton High has continued to grow, to a point where the student population is now over 2,400. Wheeler, on the other hand, was allowed to shrink to approximately 1,500 students who live in the district. Racial politics played a big role in the CCSD not doing the logical thing, which would be to move the school district east and even out the numbers. Rather, the CCSD installed a Magnet Program at Wheeler which now has approximately 400 students from outside the district in a specialized program (which costs much more per student than normal high school).

New facilities were constructed mainly for these out-of-district students and the remainder of the facilities, including the athletic facilities, were left to the parents to keep held together with duct tape.

The bottom line is that the CCSD has created immense educational and extra-curricular facilities inequities in the school system. Much of this is the result of mismanagement and racial/economic bias. It is also true that in a public school system that is funded by property tax money (and I guarantee that I pay far more than average) a boy or girl that attends Pebblebrook or Wheeler deserves the same opportunities and facilities and the boy or girl at Lassiter or Harrison. The CCSD and the county are obligated to remedy these inequities. Renovating all of the athletic stadiums with field turf, while only remedying a small portion of the problem, would be a good faith start.

Randy Grachek
Marietta
Comments
(14)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
hey, randy
|
March 22, 2010
Biggest part of the problem is that schools in So. Cobb don't get the same kind of support from parents, clubs, etc. that other schools do. Elementary school PTA meeting in So. Cobb may draw a dozen; morning kindergarten spelling bee in East Cobb school will get hundreds. Without the parents and community putting in funds and assistance, what little the county dribbles out to the schools just isn't enough to make up for the inequities. If you're going to get on folks, take your message to the communities.
Cobb Realist
|
March 20, 2010
I totally agree. Not to point fingers at different schools, but this is a good thing. We all need to be together on this. One guy has a hard on for it. So many other schools have done it in the State and it has worked! If this goes his way, then everything approved in this SPLOST should be illegal as it was part of the vote. Wasn't there any review when it was submitted? Anyone say yes or no then? Precident was set with other school systems to allow it. Let it go and fight for something else. This for lack of a better term, levels the playing field of the county in one aspect!
pay attention
|
March 20, 2010
Randy...Wheeler is getting a $10 Million addition...and turf...you should pay attention before you complain...or you can always move.
SouthernGal
|
March 20, 2010
The McEachern Endowment does not pay for non-educational items. The booster clubs borrow from the Endowment and are required to repay the loan.
High Income
|
March 19, 2010
There are inequities in the CCSD. Back in the late 80s & early 90s when expensive housing developments were being built on the edge of the Osborne HS district, those developments were shifted to the McEachern district, so the higher income families could be with in the endowment rich school. Osborne has struggled ever since. North Cobb HS was scheduled for a new classroom building in the mid 90s, but was delayed so a music/band room could be built first for an east Cobb school. If you dont't live in the Walton, Lassiter, Pope or Harrison HS district, you can just wait for the leftovers. Hillgrove is too new, but they will be in the privileged class also. It all depends on where the voters are with the most expensive houses.
anonymous
|
March 19, 2010
Randy I don't understand you final paragraph. As a fellow blogger I appreciate you made a mistake in your column, however your blog is unclear.

If your comment is to state that both Walton and Wheeler are overcrowded and it is the poor management of the SPLOST program that have allowed this to happend - then I 100% agree.

Poor management at the top - most should be let go too, to get the biggest bang for our deficit buck!

Curious ???
|
March 19, 2010
I agree. I have seen what happened in Fulton County. Bannaker, Westlake, Creekside, etc, their schools have a real sense of pride in what they have accomplished. That was done with SPLOST.
Randy Grachek
|
March 19, 2010
I stand corrected on Walton having Turf. After some more research however, according to the CCSD web site, Walton has 2,403 students and Wheeler has 1,865 (almost 400 are out of district magnet students, which makes Wheeler's actual total around 1,500). All of the concerns about Walton's facilities (almost laughable to a Wheeler parent) and over crowding could have been alleviated with 1) no magnet program, 2) using the resources spent on the magnet program to improve both Wheeler and Walton, and 3)a shifting of about 425 students to Wheeler.

Now we're stuck. Walton is overcrowded and needs resources to continue to expand. Wheeler is doomed to substandard facilities while resources are used of Walton expansion. Bad Bad management.
Kenneth Parrott
|
March 19, 2010
Mr. Grachek,

Aside from those glaring inacuracies in your article that are pointed out in the other comments, you have claimed to know "where the problem lies" and then clearly demonstrate by your other rambling assertions that you don't. Your solution seems to be that old worn out one called "spread the wealth around"

So very tiresome.....
anonymous
|
March 19, 2010
The Magnet does not have "out of district" students. They are all Cobb County. Several other schools have magnets dedicated to other area of studies.
Oliva
|
March 19, 2010
Randy - please get your facts straight. There is no 'turf' at Walton. I see this error all the time from folks who just assume that because Walton excels both academically and athletically, they must have superior facilities. Walton's facilities are no better or worse than any other Cobb - it's the involvement and parent support that make Walton an exceptional learning environment.
Wrong again Batman
|
March 19, 2010
WALTON DOES NOT HAVE TURF!!!!! The boosters at Lassiter and Harrison paid for their turf and the McEachern Endownment paid for their turf. Walton kids do not mind getting dirty.
NE Cobb Mom
|
March 19, 2010
While I understand Mr. Grachek's point, and agree with him somewhat, I would also like to point out that Lassiters booster clubs all the way down to the Jr. programs, have paid plenty of money towards the turf and jumbotron. We as athletes parents have given money galore to fund the field (not always to our liking I might add). It is always going to be a "race" and "inequity" issue with someone. I don't neccessariy think that artificial turf and a jumbotron was needed, but in order to play the sport my kids were "REQUIRED" to pony up. Not all kids have done so however, if they were a good athlete, they could play and those of us who paid covered their share. Kinda like socialism.....It goes on everywhere, unfortunately.
Virginia G
|
March 19, 2010
Walton High School has a worn out, but well loved campus. NO artificial turf- just grass and mud. A decent stadium, but no bells and whistles. Crummy, sub-standard science labs, a cramped library, band/orchestra rooms where all the students wouldn't fit if you shoehorned them in. The floors are literally worn through from having less square feet per student than ANY other school in the county. Walton has recieved far less than any other high school from all three SPLOSTs. BTW Wheeler has 2,067 kids and is over building capacity by 240 kids. Why do you want Walton kids redistricted to overcrowded Wheeler? Please lets fight to bring more resources into our area instead of fight between two great over-used under-funded next-door neighbors. WE STAND A BETTER CHANCE IF WE STAND TOGETHER. It is not about funding football fields, that may prove to be illegal anyway. It is about parity in taxpayer funding.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.