WellStar supports cigarette tax
by Kathryn Dobies
kdobies@mdjonline.com
March 09, 2010 01:00 AM | 1268 views | 11 11 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
ATLANTA — Anti-smoking advocates and Georgia health care providers conducted a rally at the state Capitol on Monday to promote a proposed $1 per pack tax increase on cigarettes.

Representatives from WellStar Health System attended the rally with officials from the Georgia Hospital Association and the Georgia Alliance of Community Hospitals, along with members of advocacy groups such as the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and the American Cancer Society.

Last week, the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids released a poll showing that 73 percent of 500 likely Georgia voters support the tobacco tax as a way to help cut the state’s budget deficit.

The tobacco tax, House Bill 39, introduced by Rep. Ron Stephens (R-Savannah), proposes raising the tobacco tax by $1 per pack. Georgia’s current cigarette tax is 37 cents per pack.

This bill is in opposition to Gov. Sonny Perdue’s proposed hospital tax, which places a 1.6 percent tax on patient revenues in hospitals and on the premiums of managed care insurers, as well as a 1.9 percent cut in the rate used to pay many physicians through Medicaid.

Through these taxes, Perdue hopes to fill a $608 million gap in Medicaid funding.

But WellStar President and CEO Dr. Gregory Simone says the tobacco tax is a better alternative to the hospital bed tax, and one that’s good for hospitals, patients and communities alike.

“Looking at it from two issues: No. 1, it’s a health care issue,” Simone said of the cigarette tax, “… the other reason that we’re interested in the cigarette tax is because the alternatives for raising money for the state are not good for the public.”

Simone said a 1.6 percent tax on patient revenue could cost WellStar about $16 million. Although Perdue’s proposal might give some money back to the hospitals in the form of a Medicaid rate increase, Simone and Susan Thompson, WellStar’s executive director of government affairs, say that money back is not a guarantee.

Thompson said because of various federal requirements the state would have to file an application to allocate some of the tax money back to the Georgia hospitals, which Congress then has to approve.

“There’s a risk for every hospital involved in that tax scenario, so there’s just no guarantee that those dollars will come back as they think they might,” Thompson said.

As it is now, Medicaid, a program that provides health insurance to low-income residents, is funded 60 percent by the federal government and 40 percent by the state. Every dollar that is generated by the state for Medicaid is matched by $3 from the federal government.

Thompson said the tobacco tax would work exactly the same way as Perdue’s proposed hospital bed tax. And according to a recent study by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, the cigarette tax would garner $354.5 million in annual revenue for Medicaid. Couple that with the federal match and the state would generate an annual total of around $1 billion.

If the hospital bed tax doesn’t pass, rumors of reducing Medicaid funding by up to 16 percent are also swirling around the Capitol.

Simone said even a 10 percent cut would be detrimental to the WellStar community, which could also lead to a $16 million loss – a loss that has no hope of being returned.

“The thing about it is that most people forget the fact that we’re a nonprofit organization. Every dollar we use for the community benefit,” Simone said. “… So what that really means then is that when these taxes or cuts go into place, those are dollars that the community loses. It’s our community that’s putting these dollars up and they’re being taken right back out of our community.”

Simone said Medicaid patients account for 12 to 13 percent of WellStar’s total annual revenue, which makes it the third largest Medicaid provider in the state. These patients cost WellStar about $32 million per year.

“So there’s already essentially, if you will, a tax on caring for the Medicaid population,” Thompson said. “So if you add that hospital tax on top of it, that just increases the losses that we carry serving Medicaid patients.”

Monday’s rally brought out more than 100 health care providers and community members advocating for the cigarette tax. Last week, Thompson said she believes that support is growing.

Simone said, “You know, mostly, the legislators don’t want to raise taxes. While I agree with that, we don’t want to raise taxes, but when they made that kind of promise to themselves and to our state, it was a different time … I think we as the voters have to give them a break and say, you know what guys, we know you don’t want to, but we also know that sometimes you have to make those changes.”

A tax opposition group, Americans for Tax Reform, will be holding a rally today at noon on the Capitol in response to Monday’s rally and opposing both the cigarette tax and the hospital bed tax. Grover Norquist, founder of the Washington-based group, will be the rally’s keynote speaker.

A spokesman for Americans for Tax Reform said the group has opposed cigarette tax increases throughout the nation and sees them as a placeholder for further tax hikes.
comments (11)
« jeff in west cobb wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 09:31 PM »
Lots of studies have shown that by far the most costly "addiction" is not alcohol, not smoking, but OBESITY. In fact, smokers actually save the gov't money, by dying so young and not collecting social security and using medicare only briefly before they die from smoking related illness.

So, if the gov't really wants to save money, TAX fat people!
« mamaof4 wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 09:30 PM »
I don't like smoking, but I hate taxes!
« No good answer. wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 09:18 PM »
You can only push the smokers so far. Before you know it, they will be growing their own out in the back yard and smoking it with no filter. More importantly, the majority of these people don't have health insurance so there will be an increase in lung cancer cases. No good answer.
« WestCobber too wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 04:25 PM »
And of course, the projected revenue raised is dependent on everyone continuing to smoke and pay the new tqx. Of course, if 50% of the people stop smoking all together, not only do they not get the new tax revenue- they lose what they got previously. Why is it that no one understands that these millions in new revenue are based on someone skewed figures that assumes everyone will continue to smoke, no one will quit and they will have all these millions rolling in. I would like to see some figures on what happens if 50% of the smokers quit and they get no revenue, much less the increased taxes. They might want to consider themselves lucky they are getting taxes are the current rate and consider themselves lucky. It is much like the property taxes - they go up on assessments, millage, etc - but people can't afford payments much less tax increases, so what happens? It ends up in appeals, or law suits and no one wins.
« Indian Joe wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 04:18 PM »
Looks like alot of Georgians will be making the trip up to South Carolina. For a two hour drive, you can save about 10 to $15 a carton - and if you can get enough it more than pays for the gas. This is ridiculous - why is the answer always to raise taxes - how about taxing the fast food industry, or fat back, or pastas, or anything made with sugar. This is just as harmful - and just as bad for kids. As a nurse at the old Kennestone (before it was Wellstar) told me one evening when we were both across the street smoking, "better a cigarette (to calm the nerves) than a gun." Connie Mack, the Country is not going to "heck", it is already there, and all anyone can think about is to raise taxes on a select group, like this is going to make everything rosy again. Wonder, as Trickle Down wrote, when these same prople are going to address the issue of how much illegals are costing not just the health care industry, but the school systems, the infrastructure, tax digests, and on and on. I am glad those of us who smoke a cigarette occasionally are going to be the goats who pay for those who most don't have the courage to recognize or make suggestions to correct the problem that is costing us all millions. Will this make people stop smoking - did prohibition stop drinking? nd why do so many of you think the only answer to any problem - guns, alcohol, smoking, etc., is to add more taxes? This is assinine. When it hits something that you people enjoy - I can hear the hollering now. Remember the example of the govenment coming for someomne's house, car, etc, but since they had neither they didn't object - but when they came for something they had - they objected, but it was too late.
« Connie Mack Jr wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 12:25 PM »
What a bunch of naive establishment idiots, The Country is going to heck and they truly believe that they will make it a smokless paradise!
« Trickle Down wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 11:22 AM »
On a related subject-how much of the cost of care for illegals does Wellstar have to absorb? If you are a U.S. citizen and run up a tab at a Wellstar hospital, Wellstar can turn your account over to a collection agency & possibly collect at least some of the money. Most illegals are paid in cash and rent, so NO money is recovered. Just another reason to enforce the laws concerning illegals. It does affect so many areas of our state & country. Just continuing taxing the U.S. citizen is not the only option.
« Mike Jones wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 08:28 AM »
Goverment trying to raise taxes again? Typical. I think the British tried something like this a few hundred years ago. It did not work out to well for them If I remember correctly.
« kenny g wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 07:38 AM »
If you're going to raise tax on tobacco,why not include guns and alcohol. People are dying every day from these but nobody says a word. Try this out for size. A dollar A bullet, A dollar A beer, and A dollar a pack of cigs. And who's the jerk that came up with the hospital bed tax.
« SouthernGal wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 07:16 AM »
We should also put a $1 per bottle/six pack tax on alcoholic beverages and a 50 cent tax on served drinks in bars and restaurants.

Not only would this raise revenues but hopefully get drunk drivers off the road.
« Frankie58 wrote on Tuesday, Mar 09 at 04:54 AM »
And the CEO himself affirms it...bottom line, profits. When are the "Doctors" running these Hospitals going to address the cost of ALCOHOL related health issues, costs and deaths? If you add a $1.00 per pack tax on cigaretts, might as well add it to a six pack or fifth...