Artificial turf to be used for family picnics, too?
March 04, 2010 01:00 AM | 792 views | 7 7 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DEAR EDITOR:

Some years ago, when I was Director of Development for Hahnemann Hospital in Philadelphia, we had a sports medicine division. I discovered then the prevalence of serious foot injuries and concussions from playing on artificial turf. Even the "new and improved" versions of turf are simply harder than grass. Toes, ankles and heads give way before the surface does. To make it more lethal, common abrasions carry a high risk of staph infections. Plus, artificial turf requires periodic disinfecting, since it breeds nasty germs more readily than grass. Just what our young athletes need - more chemicals and more injuries!

The real advantage from a "Superintendent Fred Sanderson perspective" is economic. With less upkeep requiring fewer gardening maintenance workers, it's a savings in manpower and benefits. Fewer jobs. What a great idea for our unemployed.

Then there is his argument that the new turf would benefit the community by providing more recreational grounds. When was the last time we took our families in search of an Astroturf picnic? Besides, it's verboten for outsiders to use school property. Does the superintendent want to open the playing fields to partying predators?

Every day I drive past Sope Creek Elementary, with its decades-old trailers. Other schools in the county are equally trailer bound. It makes me wonder who's "in bed" with the artificial turf contractors.

Cara Saylor Polk
East Cobb
Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
James Stoll
|
March 05, 2010
I am told, on the Spinturf website, that the new synthetic grass is much safer than the old "Stuff". That's Wunnerful!

Do you know how difficult it is to get rid of old synthetic tires. They won't allow you to put them legally into a landfill, or garbage dump. But it's wunnerful that they've figured out a way to dispose of them. They now grind them up into a fine powder and use the powder to coat the blades of grass in the "NEW & IMPROVED" sysntetic turf to make it "softer", where it can be injested into the lungs of the children who play on it. I guess that's OK because the problems won't show up intil they're in their 50s and have trouble breathing. Wunnerful! Wunnerful! Wunnerful!
Ga Tech
|
March 04, 2010
If you voted in this last election that covered the SPLOST use on the fields, you had the chance to make your stance. If you voted not to use SPLOST money for the fields then good for you, you made your effort to stop this. If you didn't vote at all, well then quit your complaining. Also stop trying to find any loop holes to make you thoughts count more than the majority of Cobb County voters who voted to use this tax on the fields.

Also have any of you complainers ever talked to the Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax Citizen Oversight Committee for Cobb County with your issues prior to the awarding bid? Just curious!

Ants?
|
March 04, 2010
Hey Cara, you bring the fried chicken & I'll bring the potato salad and the brownies. Maybe there will be fewer ants on the turf.
Big D
|
March 04, 2010
Field use at most high schools now is "verboten" because it is real grass. McEachern got synthetic turf (with their private foundation funds) several years ago and opened their field up for the public's use.
Westcobber
|
March 04, 2010
Great post. I totally agree.

EchoCharlie
|
March 04, 2010
Ms Polk's argument is weak from the start. The turf she saw injuries from "some years ago" is quite different than contemporary artificial turf, which is used for athletics all over the world.

Her argument concerning chemicals is moot - natural turf fields require extensive fertilization and weed killers to maintain. Most of the formulas used to disinfect artificial turf are made from natural enzymes and are approved by the EPA.

Lastly, the trailer situation she cites is already scheduled to be taken care of. Ms. Polk's bias against the artificial turf outweighs her grasp of the facts.
back it up
|
March 04, 2010
show your research cara. staph infection, injuries, you have no research to show that is true, the person in bed with the vendors is the same one who got the classroom addition for Sope creek in splost 3, i guess. we voted for that too, why don't we just let someone file a lawsuit and stop that, how would that be? i voted for turf and sope creek addition and i want them BOTH, and now!
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.