Don McKee: Readers react to proposed banning of 'dangerous breeds'
by Don McKee
Columnist
March 01, 2010 12:00 AM | 415 views | 5 5 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Dog owners respond to this column's suggestion that pit bulls and other dangerous breeds should be banned in view of numerous attacks on humans. Some pro and con:

Nick Brinley:

I am a proud owner of a "vicious breed" dog, a purebred Doberman Pinscher. She is my first dog....and she is not vicious or aggressive in any way. Neither is any Doberman or pit bull that I have ever met....The owners are more so to blame for a vicious or aggressive dog than the dog is. The mentality of "vicious breeds" is troubling for the dog owners .... I moved here in July and was turned down by every apartment complex and home community I went to because of my dog. Meanwhile, dogs like Chihuahuas, Pomeranians and poodles are allowed and I've personally been attacked, unprovoked, by those breeds more than anything else. There are aggressive Dobes, Pits, Rotties etc., but the number of non-aggressive ones vastly outnumber the aggressive ones.

Realty Manager:

We don't allow dangerous breeds in our rental properties for one main reason: insurance! The majority of homeowners policies will cancel your insurance if a dangerous breed is kept on the property, no matter how responsible or "gentle" the particular pet is. You just can't train the dangerous out of the breeds' DNA and it is foolish to put people in jeopardy for the pet owners' selfish desires to own such a pet in a populated area.... Life is too short and way too many safer breeds are available for families and individuals to own and enjoy as a safer pet.

Chelsea Belcher:

Blame the owner! Not the breed! I have been a pit bull owner for years. I have raised my brother's pit bulls, along with my parents. They are loyal, protective animals. I would not give up my dog for anything in the world. This breed is abused and beaten and mistreated more then any other breed. It is irresponsible pit bull owners that give these dogs a bad name.... Do you know how many "pit bull" attacks are not actually pit bulls? Or a mixed breed of dog? I am not the only one who believes in these dogs, I'm not the only one who is willing to fight for them.

Meg Quigley:

I have been saying for years that these dogs should not be pets, nor should they continue to be bred. I'm an animal lover and I own two "Canine Americans" myself, but surely the statistics of injuries and deaths from the pit bull breed should be enough to have something done. My sister owns a pit bull mix and though terrifying to look at, Cricket is one of the sweetest animals on the planet. However, when my sister walks her dog through the streets of Fullerton, Calif., other folks glare at her and cross the street to get out of the way. Clearly the majority of folks feel the same way. What is to be done?

dmckee9613@aol.com
Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
anonymous
|
March 07, 2010
Before you make comment on this breed please do your research. Any pit bull type dogs bite a person then it is not consider to be a pit in the first place. Most people on here are playing in to the media game by proposing a dangerous dog ban. There are thousand of pit bull/mix pit bull in the Atlanta if 20 of the thousand attack someone then that is good statistic in mu opinion. In regards to the little girl that was killed in her bassinet where was the parent, under no circumstance a dog should be round a baby with out supervision. Out of 20 dogs that are consider a pit bull 5 may actually been a pit.
Indian Joe
|
March 01, 2010
Southern Gal - you are obviously southern in the same sense that Scarlett O'Hara was - with no real sense, until she was forced to grow up. Five mill in insurance - of couse, that would replace someone's life - right? But then again, I forgot your answer to everything is to tax, in one way or another, every one else's way of life. I am not a big fan of pits, and would never own one, however, I used ot have a shepherd that many said was a "dangerous" breed. While he never bit or was agressive toward anyone, he was still cast in this broad blanket. I have a lab - and I can tell you, she is so friendly, it is a joy to have her - however, the only dogs she or I have a problem with are the "little" ankle nippers who think they have a right to try to intimidate everyone, with owners who use the excuse "they are only little dogs". Believe me, their teeth are jut as sharpe. So why not, Southern Gal, make everyone with any kind of animal, including cats, who can give you a nasty scratch, have $5 MILLION in insurance. Oh, let's not forget, parents of teenage drivers, elderly drivers, and anyone else you may see as a danger to "society " put under the same catagory.

Face the Facts
|
March 01, 2010
To Retiree 1-if the info in the NY Times judged "vicious dogs" by the number of bites, then I can believe a Dachshund or Chihuahua. But if you are going to take the stats of truly vicious attacks, especially in our area, then just read the news and it is a Pit Bull. And to say it is the owner's fault and not the breed. Most people are irresponsible with any pet today, so how are you going to stop the irresponsiblity along with the attacks? SouthernGal had a good idea, but it is impossible to enforce that and it still doesn't take away the physical & emotional damage done to an attack victim. To Nick Brinley-I have not seen any horrible attacks in the news about Dobermans. It is Pit Bulls people. Listen & read the news.
SouthernGal
|
March 01, 2010
Require owners of "dangerous breeds" to maintain a minimum $5,000,000 insurance policy.
Retiree1
|
March 01, 2010
I recently read a story in the NY Times listing the top ten "most vicious" breed of dogs in the US--the number one was the Dachshund!! Pit bulls and Dobermans and Rottweilers were farther down the list. So perhaps the people who say it is the owners' fault are correct.

I have personally witnessed dog attacks in my neighborhood by those breeds, and they were mostly from dogs that were left out in the yard day and night, ignored, obviously not trained or properly cared for.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.