School board mulls budget cuts
by Kathryn Dobies
kdobies@mdjonline.com
February 26, 2010 01:00 AM | 2236 views | 16 16 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA - The Cobb County School Board met before its regularly scheduled meeting Thursday to discuss ideas in preparation for major budget cuts for the 2011 fiscal year.

Continuing from a workshop conducted after its Feb. 10 work session, the board again heard from Chief Financial Officer Mike Addison about the expected budget shortfalls for FY11 and how the district arrived at the numbers.

Addison said the district is expecting a shortfall of around $60 million to $100 million.

Board Chairwoman Lynnda Crowder-Eagle asked each board member to bring their own ideas of how and where to make budget cuts, saying that no subject was off the table. But on Wednesday night, the board members mostly just drilled Superintendent Fred Sanderson with questions to get a hold on how the district is running under its current budget and how that money is being allocated and spent.

Currently, 90 percent of the district's budget is spent on personnel costs - things such as teacher salaries and benefits. Additionally, $50 million to $51 million is spent on transportation and $135 million goes to maintenance and operations of the district.

Sanderson said he and his staff have tried to set aside money for essential costs, such as electricity, in order to really hone in on services and programs that aren't essential and may be able to be cut and have a relatively minimal effect on the district.

"If we eliminate this program, is this something that we are, collectively, willing to do? We're going to have to make these choices, whereas three years ago, we would never thought about eliminating that particular service," Sanderson said.

The board did kick around a few ideas for increasing class sizes, but board member Alison Bartlett expressed her concern that something like that might jeopardize the academic performance of the district's students, the district's No. 1 goal, Bartlett reminded the board.

Board member Dr. John Abraham agreed, saying the board should look at cutting the budget in places that don't directly effect student acheivment.

"I want to keep the integrity of the classroom as best as we can right now so we enhance the achievement," Abraham said.

Board member Dr. John Crooks asked the superintendent and his staff to answer specific questions regarding things such as the average cost per student throughout the district, the average cost per student per school level and the cost per student for each school, along with the state and district capacity for each school. Crooks' rationalization for these questions are to look at the district at a big picture level so that he and his colleagues can make the most informed decision possible when it comes time to vote for the budget in June.

"I think we're at a point now where what's important to us is one thing, what is absolutely essential is something else," Crooks said. "And I need to know all the data before I say this is essential."

Crooks also mentioned that he had spoken to Sanderson before the meeting about doing something he called an efficiency program.

Later, Crooks said that this strategy would look at each school in the district and review all of their programs to see if any were overlapping and look at how to consolidate those programs to save money. He also said that he would recommend to the district that it hire an independent agency to help evaluate the efficiency of the district and produce an objective opinion on how to run it better.

"Helps you figure out how to prioritize where you spend your dollars," Crooks said.

When asked if he thought the board would come to the same conclusion as an independent agency on how to run a more efficient district, Crooks said that was the $64 million question.

"If you start at a global perspective and you build a case, I believe smart people will come to the same conclusion," Crooks said.

One thing all the board members agreed on was that not everyone is going to be happy come June.

"I want to be honest to whatever camera that's looking at me," Crooks said. "There will be people who will not be happy at the end of this day."

At the end of the meeting, Crowder-Eagle announced that she would be conducting the district's first of four budget forums March 9 at 7 p.m. at Kennesaw Mountain High School to inform the community about progress on the budget.

Also at the budget meeting, the board heard from Holli Cash about a proposal for conflict resolution training. Carol Rice, a partner with Conflict Resolution Academy, offered the board a free training session with her company, which specializes in training mediators for sate courts. Rice said she would come back to the board with a list of classes the company offers and encouraged the board to chose from this list. She said she would prefer to do an all-day work session some time in March with the board.
Comments
(16)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
CobbOak
|
June 07, 2010
Please help Oakwood High School continue to serve Cobb County Students!

Last Chance, unless you decide to sue because of their violation of due process:

6/9 CCSD Board Meeting

Public Comments - 7:30 AM sign in to speak

Board Meeting, comments - 8:30 AM

514 Glover St. Marietta, Georgia 30080

(Legal Adoption of the FY2011 Budget at Regular Board Meeting)
anonymous
|
March 06, 2010
If CCSD is looking for ways to cut the budget then why was this telematics approved by them. It will only cut 4-6 jobs and will free up field co-ordinators to do their jobs. Why spend $1m for these piddly savings when money could be spent on fixing or replacing our buses?
demlib
|
February 28, 2010
Reduce Sanderson's salary to what it was before his last raise. Afterall, we all have to give up, right!
anonymous
|
February 27, 2010
It is 10%, that's all. That shoulkd be a goal annually: reduce expense, increase efficiency. If no one is looking, then get rid of the top guys and get someone that will.
anonymous
|
February 27, 2010
to County Watcher- there are in house people that will point things out, but will anyone do anything with the recommendations or look at the areas pointed out or even ask them for their input? I am tired of people saying that the entire district is corrupt and worthless. There are some good people out there. What experience can you bring to the table County Watcher, besides stereotyping? What is your dog in this fight?
Obvious
|
February 27, 2010
Personnel is 90% of the cost of Cobb Public Schools so it is rather obvious that personnel is the place to trim costs - I would start by eliminating the "supplemental" payment to all (after reducing legal, superintendent and anyone making more than $100,000 by 30% ) employees which is funded by local property taxes. The tax digest should go down 20-25% so the supplment is no longer affordable - This 15% salary reduction will hurt but it is far better to have 85% of a salary than 0 percent !This would not necessitate reduced academics (classroom sizes and class offerings) or services for the students of Cobb.
Kennesaw Voter!
|
February 27, 2010
I know something the board can CUT right NOW!....

The board needs to cut the 30 something GRADUATION COACHES! I am upset that guidance counselors are not doing that work! CUT those Graduation Coaches....NOW!
IAGREEWITHSERIOUSLY
|
February 27, 2010
I agree with Seriously. It seems like the teachers and parapros are the ones who keep having to make all the sacrifices. And they are the ones who are dealing day to day with the students. It does not appear that the County Office is making too many sacrifices. There are so many positions there, that I wonder if they even know what the other ones are doing. I think it is time for them to make some cuts and sacrifices. The main focus of education should be the students in our public schools. When trying to make some decision in the county office, maybe they need to ask themselves, "How is this really going to benefit the students of Cobb County?" That is what the teachers and parapros do!!!!
welll
|
February 26, 2010
Well, cut the TV station we are paying for. You only have it to see yourselves on TV. The cable tv companies used to supply community coverage of school board meetings, now we are paying them! What a joke.
welll
|
February 26, 2010
Well, I know you can save money by eliminating school secretaries. They don't do enough to keep their jobs. Half can't use the data programs the county has in use. The clerks do all of their work for less days of pay and a smaller daily rate of pay.
fools no more
|
February 26, 2010
Cut speech therapy - it belongs in the healthcare sector - not in the education sector.

Ask the teachers for suggestions, ask drivers, ask workers where there can be cuts.

cut all the adminstration, then there won't be more "things" thought of by them that the teachers have to do!

Seriously? Please!
|
February 26, 2010
It is march 1st and the county has no idea how what to cut? Really? The best you can do is HIRE someone to tell you what to do? Instead of saving money, you are going to spend more to find out how to save money? Stop the madness. Teachers and parapros are waiting to find out if they have a job and you are just mulling this over now? How about keeping the teachers and parapros, and go to a 180 days parapro contract and 185 day teacher contract. Do not replace teachers whom are retiring and leaving. Oh yes, and cut 10% of the useless postions at the county office. Cut all the car allowances, cell phones, and meals for the top brass! DONE and for FREE!
County watcher
|
February 26, 2010
I think that Crooks had a great idea to hire yet another consultant to go and look at each school to see what type of repetitive, overlapping programs are being offered. How Much will that cost this system?

Take this same idea and have them look directly at the administration. Now I am sure there is overlapping repetitive type jobs there that are a lot more costly and could save the district a lot more money then the continual path of always taking away from our schools.

It just always amazes me that with all the staff at the district office that there is not one person there that can provide the board with these answers. Don't we have all these area superintendents that should know this information?

But as I write this I just shake my head because anyone hired or anyone in house will not tell the truth and we will have the same information as always - worthless and one-sided!
do not waste my mone
|
February 26, 2010
You do not need a consultant. I there are a few people within the district that have come from private industry that could help analyze the operations and give good ideas. Regardless of what people think, not everyone that works in the district is brainwashed into the "that's the way we do it" mentality. Save some money and utilize the talent that you have there!
Work Smarter
|
February 26, 2010
They want to hire somebody to figure this budget problem out??? What are they there for? Step up and make the hard needed decisions! Who care if someones "feelings" get hurt. I will start by asking why does a middle school 4 assistant principals?
ms.s
|
February 26, 2010
Crooks wants "... to be honest to whatever camera that is looking at me." Yeap, a political smoozer through-and-through. How about being honest with your constituents.

Watching Crooks and Abraham making googly eyes, faces, and hand signals during the Board meeting when the camera was not on them showed Crooks' true honesty level.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides