Mike Reagan: Tea Partiers ... a grassroots movement of which Reagan would be proud
by Mike Reagan
Columnist
February 25, 2010 01:00 AM | 498 views | 8 8 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I've been making the rounds to talk about something which was very important to my father, and which is very important to me: the strength and power of a grassroots movement of ordinary citizens.

In the past year, we have seen - again and again - the power of the people to upset the political establishment and steer our country back on course. From town hall meetings to elections, from marches on Washington to shifts among independent voters, the American people have demonstrated their power in our democracy.

I have no doubt that, were my father still alive, he would deeply support this grassroots up-swell. Foremost among Ronald Reagan's principles were his core belief in individual freedom and his opposition to government intrusion into the lives of private citizens. The Tea Party movement and others echo these sentiments powerfully.

When my father decided to run a second time for the presidency in 1980, I remember how he brought our family together to talk about his decision. He talked about the bellmen and the chambermaids of the hotels he would visit who wanted him to try it again. For my father, it was never about the noticeably powerful. Instead, his presidency was about embracing and encouraging the empowerment of every citizen of this great country.

Campaigning with my father in 1976 and 1980, I worked firsthand with the voters and activists who are the linchpins of our political system. One of the greatest things about our system is that no one person can speak for everyone. In every movement, there are people who disagree, people who want to plow another path. And in every election, we are faced with imperfect candidates who will never manage to represent us quite the way we would represent ourselves.

Too many have blindly condemned the Tea Party movement because they heard one speech, or read one article, with which they took issue. Those people have chosen to dismiss the truth and integrity of the ideals of freedom, responsibility and constitutional limits simply because they didn't like the look or sound of those who practiced them. My father would never have done this.

Inside the Tea Party, too many have quickly dismissed elected officials and potential candidates because they failed to meet up to every possible expectation. If we are to accomplish our goals, we must remember that while our elected officials are imperfect, they must also be our allies. Moreover, if Republicans wish to have more influence in Congress, we must support the nominated candidate even when he or she was not our first choice.

After all, even my father would have failed many of today's litmus tests. As governor of California, Ronald Reagan raised taxes. Though he was pro-life, he signed an abortion bill.

I often tell people that had my father had to run for the Republican nomination in 2008, he might not have been elected.

As 2012 approaches, and in the critical mid-term elections coming this very year, we need to make sure that we're not looking so hard for the next idealized "Ronald Reagan" that we miss the real person who has the potential to lead this country in the direction of strength and prosperity.

It is time to turn the vital power and promise of the conservative grassroots movement to bear on putting people into office who will be our allies for the future, and strengthening the allies we already have. As my own contribution to the effort, I have organized Reagan PAC, which will seek out and support those candidates who share the principles of my father and are willing to work for their realization. I ask you to join me as we strive for a better tomorrow.

Mike Reagan, the elder son of the late President Ronald Reagan, is spokesperson for The Reagan Nation and chairman and president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Swing and a Miss
|
February 25, 2010
Dear West Cobb Widow;

You missed my point completely. I am on your side. Congress is the LEGISLATIVE body that passes or enacts or approves legislation. Presidents CAN'T do that. Presidents CAN'T spend a dime. Only Congress can do that. Read YOUR Constitution. I was responding to the dimwit by the 'name' of "bring him back" that doesn't get it at all. I hardly expected you wouldn't get it. I salute Reagan for walking out on Mikhail G. He deserved it, as RR held ALL the cards.

Relax Ms. WCW....Reagan was right. Someday, the elites will understand that. Shame that they don't now.
History buff
|
February 25, 2010
Let's not forget one of the most important contributions of Reagan was that he made people proud to be Americans, to stand up and do the right thing. His influience on the American peoples attitudes was the greatest contribution that could have been made, Too bad we have no leaders now who make people believe in the goodness, greatness and opportunites in this country. We have ended up with a bunch of cry babies who only want to know what they are going to get, even if it is from someone else's labors and efforts because they are too lazy to do it themselves.
WestCobb widow
|
February 25, 2010
To swing and a miss - it is amazing how you people can turn words around - take them out of context, etc to try to make your point. Think we found out that you have to listen to what people actually are saying (campaign of 09) - there is a big differnce between "proposing" and "enacting". You are the dimwit if you think a president can "pass" anything - maybe you need to go to Webster and find the definition of "propose" and "enact". And for Reagan walking out on the Russians, - give him a little credit for ending the cold war with them. They finally came up against someone they couldn't bully
Indian Joe
|
February 25, 2010
Hey anonymous - did you forget that Clinton's balanced budget (surplus) was only because he had a republican congress. I can still hear his "we can balance the budget in 10 years" - "5 years, etc. until he finally acted and bowed to the republican demands that we have a balanced budget. Don't also forget, that spending is not the perogative of the president - it is congress. Check the records and see when most of the Bush deficits occurred - after the 06 elections in case you are interested when he got the libs in power in Congress. Let's not forget either that the Clinton tax increases was the largest tax hike in American history to that point. Guess you can get a surplus when everyone is forced to contribute to it.
Swing and a miss?
|
February 25, 2010
You swung and fell down. Everything mentioned was true. Reagan walked out on Gorbaschev. So? They were both back next year and accomplished a great deal in with compromise. Social Security? No surprise that he wanted to scuttle it; every Republican does. But he and O'Neill came up with a plan that extended it's solvency. And as for passing, wonder what you call health care reform? I imagine that Obama is attached to it.

Reagan was a liberal compared to the useless party today's GOP has become. You could at least work something out with him.
anonymous
|
February 25, 2010
Don't forget about the huge deficit that was passed onto future generations...Oh, never mind, Bill Clinton fixed that for him. Give me Clinton over Reagan any day!!
Swing and a Miss
|
February 25, 2010
HUH? Presidents don't "pass" anything, you dimwit. Reagan proposed tax cuts (and got them), and changes to Social Security (which he didn't get in sufficient form), and walked out on Mikhail Gorbachev at Reykjavik.

Have you been reading your union-sponsored, government-schools history books again?

Yeah...thought so.
Bring him back!
|
February 25, 2010
I miss Reagan. He passed tax increases most years of his presidency, saved Social Security and compromised with the Soviets on arms control. Good times...
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.