Don McKee: Readers give pros and cons on teacher-pay-for-performance plan
by Don McKee
Columnist
February 12, 2010 01:00 AM | 605 views | 5 5 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Gov. Perdue's plan to base 50 percent of teachers' pay on student achievement drew responses pro and con.

From Pat Head:

"What is wrong with evaluations? What is wrong with setting goals? Just coming to work for 20 years does not make you a good teacher. It makes you loyal - but not good.

"And just because you have the word Masters after your name or Doctor before doesn't make you a good teacher either. In fact, I'm tired of my kids teachers rushing off to class right after school. "Some of the most cerebral yet worthless teachers I had were doctors. I'm not saying pursuing higher education shouldn't be a goal. The teachers just shouldn't get paid more just because they have it!"

From a Cobb teacher:

"I am an educator in my 7th year teaching in Cobb County. Moving from Michigan after graduating college, the scene in Georgia is all too familiar. My wife is also a teacher who is very passionate and amazing at her profession. Having two teachers' incomes will be very trying in the coming months with furlough deductions.

"I think it is telling that only 13 percent of teachers responded to the survey. I agree the majority of teachers have no problem being evaluated on performance-although I feel 47 percent of teachers wanting to be paid based on the same 'mystery' criteria is way higher than I would put our staff's opinion. This topic is on the minds of every teacher, although without a real union in the South many are too afraid of consequences to speak out.

"Our representatives seem to keep taking from us because we as a group have not spoken out. I am baffled at how they plan to manage a system of student growth from year to year.

"What if my student I've had all year moves? Who gets credit for their scores? What about music, physical ed., art? What if I get a student a week before the test? If they score poorly, do I get a lower salary? Who will teach in classes or schools with large behavior issues and students that don't care to learn? Will instances of cheating increase by teachers to raise salaries? What about East Cobb schools or others with high achieving students? Their growth may be small even though they are doing great.

"The words on paper sound great and they sound like they would save money (at the cost of hurting those that teach our youth), but one of my 5th graders could tell you it would be idiotic. Even my worst behaved students could voice that the effort I have put into them to help them academically, socially, visit them at home to help during difficult times, phone calls, and emails could never be measured on a test....

"Has a state that has done performance-based salaries ever been successful? They want us to do more, with more students, less time, and lower pay."

What's your opinion?

dmckee9613@aol.com
Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
dogmom
|
February 14, 2010
This is in response to Pat Head's comment that "he's tired of his kids' teachers rushing off to class after school." Why shouldn't they leave work? The work day is over. Teachers are paid for an 8 hour day for 190 days during the contract period. I'd think he'd appreciate the teacher trying to improve his/her skill set so they can better help "his" kids. I love what I do, yet it's only one part of my life.

As for pay for performance, the legislature can't honor it's agreement to pay national board certified teachers their stipend...so why would any reasonable teacher believe the legislature is going to keep their word to reward those who meet their performance goals under a pay for performance scenario? I certainly don't.



I do live within my means. Only more of my means gets taken in the form of higher taxes, increased health care costs, mandatory TRS contributions and fewer teacher supply monies. If you expect my classroom to look the same and for me to work more hours for less money, you are sadly mistaken.

Stay current!
|
February 12, 2010
"The teachers just shouldn't get paid more just because they have it!"

-- Law is going into effect this summer that teachers must be working in the field of their advanced degree to earn the increased salary.

--Also, do you go to a doctor with a doctorate, masters, bachelors, associates, or high school degree... should doctors not get paid more just because they have a higher degree... Teaching pay based on degrees is so low it is rediculous- you can have a doctorate and barely cross 100k if you work 30 years and become administrator of an elementary. Know any other professions that have doctorates and you can say that about?
In Response...
|
February 12, 2010
A teachers pay is spread out over 12 months. Every furlough day is taken out of just one months pay not spread out. So for your example of a two teacher income... that could be around $500 in one months pay (around 10% less in that months check). They will be giving this 3 times over the next couple months- and if you noticed- the article said in the coming months. This year was a 16.2 million cut, next year estimates have been around 60-100 million. Living in your means isn't the question... Are you willing to give up $1,500 of your salary over the next 3 months and be expected to do more work? I teach 7:15-2:05... Most times I need to stay an hour or more after school to grade, plan, and communicate. Not to mention things over the weekends. No over time pay. I think if you took my salary and divided it by the hours I work, I'm making closer to minimum wage. But that is what it takes to be great. So when you sacrifice $1,500, work overtime without pay on a daily basis, work for free on weekends- please contact me... I'll recommend you to teach. If you are on the outside looking in, you truly don't understand.
Rebuseye
|
February 12, 2010
"Has a state that has done performance-based salaries ever been successful? No, and they never will be because there are too many variables in any kind of evaluations that will be attempted. Granted, it would be great to base educator pay on performance, but where else (except in sports) is that successful?

Unions might solve teacher pay woes, but they definitely are not an asset to education (actually a detriment).

No one is picking on teachers, but cuts must come from the most expensive programs. I am very supportive for adequate and rewarding teacher pay, but we really must face up to the future where all of us are very likely to suffer lower standards of living because of past economic sins.

To me, teachers are very important, hard working people, as are many others. However, we should be glad when people are able to keep their jobs, and try not to complain excessively about lesser misfortunes.

Tired of crying
|
February 12, 2010
If you have been around for 7 years and a spouse that also works in the schools that means you have a combined gross salary of between $80-100k depending on if you have a bachelors or masters. That will be tough to live with?? Gimme a break. Live within your means and stop whining
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.