School district high on artificial grass
by Kathryn Dobies
kdobies@mdjonline.com
February 11, 2010 01:00 AM | 1902 views | 21 21 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The football field at Lassiter High School in east Cobb is covered with artificial turf.
The football field at Lassiter High School in east Cobb is covered with artificial turf.
slideshow
MARIETTA - Cobb school board members on Wednesday heard a presentation to upgrade the county's 16 high school playing fields from grass to artificial turf. The board will likely vote on the matter at its Feb. 25 meeting.

The plan, funded by the third installment of the Special Local Option Sales Tax, would be to give each district high school $800,000 to install the turf. In its original proposal, the district planned to give each school $1 million, but with the estimated reduction in revenue from SPLOST III, the district has had to make an adjustment.

Doug Shepard, the district's chief administrative officer of SPLOST, did say these adjusted numbers have no bearing on the amount of turf that can be installed in each playing field since the lowest bidder for the project has come in between $500,000 to $600,000 per field, which is well below what was predicted. Excess funds could be used for additional physical education upgrades, district officials said.

When asked why the district is planning to upgrade the fields now, Shepard said voters approved the project with SPLOST III in 2008. The board also voted to prioritize the project that year. He said the time was right since it does not require an overly costly design phase and the market is ripe for construction bids.

"We have funds available right now ... and we can turn dirt on it immediately," Shepard said.

Shepard assured board members that all the classroom additions in SPLOST III have been approved to be fully funded and that the turf project is not taking precedence over any of those construction projects.

District Athletic Director Steve Jones and McEachern High School Athletic Director Jim Dorsey also spoke to board members in support of the turf fields. Dorsey was instrumental in the planning of McEachren's turf field nearly eight years ago, when that high school received an endowment fund for the upgrade.

Jones, who has spoken to all of the high school athletic directors and most of the principals, laid out a tentative plan for the installation in two phases. Phase one installation would begin with a few of the district high schools in March, while the rest of the schools would not begin their installation until after the spring sports season in late May or early. June. The installation period would take about eight to 12 weeks. District officials hope to have all the fields done by the end of August or early September, in time for most of the school's first home football games.

McEachern, Harrison and Lassiter, the three high schools that already have synthetic turf, can use the district funds to upgrade their fields or install turf to their playing fields.

The new synthetic turf, the district claims, will save thousands of dollars per year in maintenance fees and also help the district with its water bill.

Board members and district officials both emphasized that this upgrade would not just positively effect the district's football and sports teams, but that the fields would also be used for physical education classes, band and ROTC.

Dr. Gordon Pritz, associate superintendent of operational support, said the community could also use these fields.

"We look at this as a quality of life improvement in our county," Pritz said. "I've heard one person describe it as adding six new parks to the county."
Comments
(21)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Alan Faircloth
|
February 13, 2010
Equating the turfing of fields to public parks is inaccurate. I highly doubt that the general public can just start using these fields the same as parks. Granted, there may be certain other HS Sports teams that use the fields, but they are sports teams...not the school at large. Of course, none of this really matters because the expenditures, regardless of approval by voters, violates the law governing SPLOST expenditures and is prohibited. The result will be the same as in the Power To Learn laptop case.
Taxpayer2010
|
February 12, 2010
We voted for it Walter - drop your lawsuit. Bring on the Sprinturf - it is absolutely the best thing the board has done and I am very excited about it. It was the main reason I voted for SPLOST III. BTW, your children can get a great education in Cobb if they are motivated to do so - don't tell me they are flunking because of one extra person in the classroom or because of environmental conditions.
To Lucy
|
February 12, 2010
You obviously have never walked on the artificial fields. They are quite spongy in feel. No one's getting hurt landing on them instead of traditional grass.
To Con Job
|
February 12, 2010
The watering restrictions were eased last summer. Wake UP!!
Cobb Taxpayer
|
February 12, 2010
1) Injuries go up on artificial Turf and many schools have gone back to real turf

2) In this economy, artificial turf should be on the list as "After all other projects are funded"
to the ill informed
|
February 11, 2010
What NO ONE is asking, is who is going to fund these turf fields when THEY NEED TO BE REPLACED? They don't last forever, and the replacement will be roughly 1/3 of the cost of new. Saving money is a flat out lie! The county pays for fertilizer and overseed, which amounts to ~ $5k/yr. Add water at $20K a year (and yes, we can water now) and the annual cost is $25K/yr. If the field lasts 10 years (avg. per manufacturers), thats $50K/yr. How are we saving money? The boosters pay for the paint and new sod as needed. Other than officials and transportation, the County pays zero for sports- its all from Booster fundraisers. The boosters dont even get the gate $- the school does! On the flip side, it's about time the County did something for sports. Somehow they are able to do in Fulton Cty. Research clearly shows participation in extra curricular activities is beneficial. Some of these comments posted just make me laugh! Do your homework, people!
to faircloth
|
February 11, 2010
try every afternoon and evening in the fall and spring by band, soccer, lacrosse, etc. now and every day during the school day by PE classes once its in. you probably don't even have a clue on what goes on at a high school in the spring, stop by one afternoon in the next couple weeks and you will be amazed and then informed
BJ Hardesty
|
February 11, 2010
It was expensive to maintain lush green fields during an extended drought. Now it's raining and flooding a lot of the fields. Turf fields do not need mowed, fertilized, or reseeded. However, how long does a turf feed last? How much of the $800,000 would have been spent on upkeep and for how long?

We've had numerous kids pass out from heat stroke and suffer injuries due to the excessive heat in the south. On top of that we're going to install a fixture that significantly increases the temperature of the playing field. Has anyone considered the athlete's health?

In this economy where we're increasing class sizes, furloughing teachers, and making drastic cuts in the educational budget, it appears we have our priorities misplaced. Who are the educated individuals making this decision? Perhaps it explains our ranking nationally in the educational systems.
Durn gud futball
|
February 11, 2010
I caint say I got teached in Cobb County so I may be confuzed about what precedence meens but I think it meens comes before so if we'uns plans to build some futball feelds before class rooms I think that meens them feelds is takin precedence. Now it sounds to me like them feelds is a gud deel since they don't need as much water but lookin at what these fellers are sayin it sure iz gonna take a lot of fertilizer to get em in. I am reel happy that them feelds can be parks too. I am gonna park my camper on one and it will be just like the infeeld at Talladega and when futball seesun comes I am gonna pull over on the sideline and watch me some durn gud futball. Thanky to all them folks on the schul bored for makin sure we'uns have third wurld school bildins and top notch feelds. Makes me proud.
anonymous
|
February 11, 2010
Do not think that the fields will be wide open to all Cobb citizens. There will be alot of guidelines and restrictions
welll
|
February 11, 2010
well, I think artificial turf is a bad choice of how to use educational funds! Classrooms need carpet without mildew.
truth hurts
|
February 11, 2010
If we keep having to raise a special tax to pay for for everyones toys than we obviouly can't afford to buy the toys. Stop the taxes!
Con job
|
February 11, 2010
Fake turf doesn't save the "taxpayers" a dime. Booster clubs pay for upkeep and new sod (or they are supposed to) and outdoor watering has been ILLEGAL for the past three years now and will be until the Gov says otherwise. Coach Sanderson has turned our respected coaches into con men shilling for an illegal grab of tax money for football fields. Yes, staduims are expensive, but they aren't necessary and the general assembly tried to protect the taxpayers by making sure we wouldn't get stuck paying for them.
Veteran Observer
|
February 11, 2010
Mr. Faircloth, if you can get out of your house and go to any high school on any Saturday in the Spring, Fall, or Summer you will see the COMMUNITY using these fields and tracks! Youth football, track, lacrosse, drum and bugle, etc... use these fields on Saturdays and many practice on them after the high school teams at night! This is the smartest move possible for the community since Commissioner Olens and the Board of Commissioners have run for the hills and killed the parks bond rather than find the cost savings out of the county bureaucracy! I applaud the Board of Education for the political courage to do the right thing for all members of the community and to enhance property values for those of us with no children in the system! The community voted for it, it makes sense, put it in!
Liar, Liar
|
February 11, 2010
"Sheppard assured board members...the turf project is not taking precedence over any of those(classroom)construction projects." What a lie. The only classroom projects that have been approved and funded are Eastside, North Cobb and South Cobb. The rest are all up in the air. The classrooms won't happen for some schools until 2013, if they happen at all. Hey Sheppard- check a dictionary- "precedence" means to come before. The fake grass IS COMING BEFORE the real classrooms by several years! When you and the rest of your staff were playing with this fake grass RFP- you could have been getting bids on classroom work instead. The fake grass DID take precedence and still is! The School Board is killing SPLOST for all time by taxing poor peoples/old peoples groceries and medicine for pretty football fields.

Alan Faircloth
|
February 11, 2010
6 NEW PARKS???? Pritz must be insane to make such a statement. Let me know the date and time that non-football or band members plan to use those fields and I will be there camera in hand to document them being kicked off. Athletic Departments are highly protective of their fields. The "turf" battle (pun intended) is intense. I'm not buying this latest lie about the fields having uses (and actually being used) beyond athletics. Consider me from Missouri and SHOW ME first.
Parent in West Cobb
|
February 11, 2010
Classrooms before artificial turf!!! All of the kids in trailers need a real classroom before a minority of students need artificial turf!
Lucy W
|
February 11, 2010
Since when does a park have artificial turf - where is that person from NYC?

I can just see it now - a family of four having a picnic on the football field under the goal post - heaven!

How many more injuries are more serious on the turf - I'm not talking about football because those precious boys are all padded up - I'm talking about soccer, lacrosse, other team sports that are supposedly going to use this. It has to hurt alot more hitting concrete then dirt.

obvious
|
February 11, 2010
a no brainer, makes good sense, we voted for it, bring it on, but I am sure the usual naysayers will do all they can to undermine it, by the way MDJ your unbiased and matter of fact reporting on some recent CCSD topics, such as this, is refreshing, please keep it up, might renew my subscription
Cobb teacher
|
February 11, 2010
No argument that the school board can only spend SPLOST money on items approved in the vote, BUT the projected SPLOST revenue is down because of the economy and the list of projects for SPLOST III is long and varied. Seems to me that another item might be more prudent for the "funds available" right now. What a shame if next year we read that something more crucial to students than artificial turf must be abandoned because there is not enough SPLOST III revenue to implement it.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.