Which football job is better Lassiter or Marietta?
by John Bednarowski
MDJ Sports Editor
February 03, 2010 03:43 PM | 1450 views | 9 9 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
With the surprising announcement that Lassiter football coach Chip Lindsey would be leaving the school to take the quarterbacks coach position at Troy University, we now have two coaching openings in Cobb County – Lassiter and Marietta.

My question is, if you were a coach, which job would be more attractive?

On the surface, it would seem to be a no-brainer. Lassiter is coming off 12-1 season where they went to the state quarterfinals while Marietta finished at 5-6, and over the last two seasons the Trojans went 21-4 while the Blue Devils finished 8-13.

But is the question really that black and white? Is Lassiter a better job than Marietta?

The year before Lindsey took over the Trojans program, they went 3-7 while the Blue Devils went 7-3.

Talent goes in cycles. Lassiter was able to run the spread offense to perfection mainly because they had Parade All-America quarterback Hutson Mason at the helm. The administration vows to keep the spread in tact when the new coach is hired. Now the question is will they have the talent to make it flourish without the likes of Mason and Griffin Roelle.

Marietta on the other hand, could be a sleeping giant. One thing the Blue Devils always seems to have is speed. What if they try the spread offense and get some of those speedy players in space with a chance to make people miss?

Friday Richards did a great job as coach at Marietta, but after 15 years, maybe it is time for a fresh offensive approach.

Lassiter is the new kid on the block. Marietta is steeped in tradition and support. The Trojans job may be slightly more attractive than the Blue Devils, but it’s a lot closer than many people would think.

But that’s just my opinion. What do you think?

similar stories

CHIP RUSH | 7 months ago

What is your choice as top sports story of year? | 3 months ago

Ripple effect: Trojans' starter keeps Yellow Jackets grounded | 10 days ago

Lassiter counselor still not back to work | 29 days ago

Otis Brumby III: Tradition at a Crossroads | 1 month ago

comments (9)
« Unknown12122424 wrote on Thursday, Mar 18 at 01:00 PM »
Marietta. All day every day.... Ok Marietta hasn't been that good over the last couple of seasons.... But the traditions, the communities support, the love for the sport..... That's what it's all about....
« Trojanater wrote on Thursday, Feb 11 at 11:44 PM »
Lassiter has absolutely tremendous facilities, a principal committed to maintain a winning tradition, and the money to keep going what Lindsey started. With the new QB, it is going to be 4 more years of Texas Tech "guns up" football, with the ball flying all over the place. Its going to be a great program for years to come. My vote LASSITER TROJANS.
« Timer wrote on Sunday, Feb 07 at 08:20 PM »
The new coach at Lassiter hopefully will be able to recruit &/or bus in the talent like Lindsay.
« ghost of Northcutt wrote on Saturday, Feb 06 at 06:47 AM »
Just curious, but assuming the current MHS assistants remain at MHS in their teaching positions, and not retained by the new HC, and not leave for coaching gigs at other schools, how can a new head coach bring in his "staff" - especially coordinators - if there are no open slots? In fact, since a deal has been struck that guarantees the former HC his "teaching" job for the next few years (and that's a whole other story, right Mr. Mayor?), there really isn't a lot of wiggle room. And with furloughs imminent and depleted budgets getting tighter, I don't see MCS adding slots. Perhaps natural attrition will free up a couple of slots, but I would imagine HC candidates are asking about this during the interview process. Just curious.
« Do Your Homework wrote on Thursday, Feb 04 at 10:38 PM »
Beware of Marietta. Everything that glitters isn't gold. Lot of internal strife. Toxic environment that lacks trust. Kids and parents run the school. Good luck trying to discipline the athletes. Some say there are athletes still in the building. This ain't the late 80's and early 90's. Other schools have athletes who want to work to get better and compete. Not at Marietta. The players want something for nothing. The parents enable it and the school placates to the parents. Bad combination for coaches trying to discipline. And if you do go, you better get used to the "OM" way of doing things. They don't want change, they want "yes" people. Coaches grave yard for the next decade or two.
« High School Fan wrote on Thursday, Feb 04 at 05:15 PM »
Well, I think Dexter Wood might have an opinion - he was unsuccessful at Lassiter and somewhat successful at Marietta with Zeir quarterbacking and then tremendously successful at Buford. It was not the QB at Lassiter that made it happen - it was Coach Lindsey and the "system". Mason should go with Lindsey to Troy and have a bit of a chance to play at the next level. Larry Blankney at Troy is the brains behind the system and his assistants depart for major jobs like Texas Tech, and Auburn in very short order. Lassiter would be my choice particularly if the next hire is an EDUCATOR that happens to coach.
« LHS Dad wrote on Thursday, Feb 04 at 03:52 PM »
What you don't know about Lassiter going into next year is that the next starting QB is a freshman who might end up being better than Mason. The kid moved here specifically to play for Lassiter and has already had unofficial discussions with a few SEC teams. I'll bet he throws for more yards than Hutson. Furthermore, the starting Varsity running back, Tyren Jones is also only a freshman. We will end up with better hands at receiver than this varsity squad had too. This team will have a State Championship within 2-3 seasons as long as the next Coach doesn't screw it up.
« KSU Owls wrote on Thursday, Feb 04 at 09:53 AM »
The spread offense would be the perfect offense at a program like Marietta. Also, if you take a larger, say 15-20 year sample, you'll probably see that Marietta consistently has the better talent. Both schools I'm sure have great kids, but I would have side with the deeper tradition at Marietta.
« polk@cleburne wrote on Wednesday, Feb 03 at 08:59 PM »
I think the MHS job would be the better of the two, but I am biased. Great facilities, lots of history dating back to 1913, good community support. What MHS needs is a fresh approach that will make the program relevant again. With all respect to 2004 and 2005 region titles, the program has been in decline. The head coach has been dis-engaged for sometime, so a new approach is most welcomed. Once upon a time Marietta cornered the market on speedy skill players but now every school in the area has comparable talent. Would love to have a coach that can really develop QBs, something that we don't have, and any team's success begins and ends with a competent and capable QB.