Hearing ends on school sex assault claim
by Kathryn Dobies
kdobies@mdjonline.com
January 28, 2010 01:00 AM | 1864 views | 12 12 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA - A tribunal hearing for Frank Robinson, the Lassiter High School counselor accused of inappropriately touching a 17-year-old student and making lewd comments to another, ended Wednesday.

Robinson restated his innocence, while Nina Gupta, the school district's attorney, said the counselor and girls basketball coach "treated his high school like his own personal singles bar."

Gupta asked Robinson if he understood exactly what he has to lose regarding the case.

"My wife is here, this is my life," Robinson, 45, responded.

In his final statements to the tribunal, he said, "I'm sitting here today to tell you I stand firm and that I did nothing wrong. I know this in my heart of hearts - I didn't do anything wrong."

The tribunal, which is comprised of school board Chairwoman Lynnda Crowder-Eagle and board members Dr. John Abrahams and Holli Cash, will present its recommendation to the entire school board within the next five days. Following that recommendation, the board is required to vote within 10 days of receiving the court transcript whether to terminate Robinson. Warren Fortson, Robinson's attorney, expects the vote to happen at the board's Feb. 10 work session.

Robinson continued his testimony from Friday, the second day of the hearing, by explaining his close relationship with one of his accusers and her family. He said he always treated the female student who claimed he made inappropriate comments to like a daughter, and that he never did or said anything inappropriate to either of his accusers.

Both Gupta and Fortson again brought up the topic of a polygraph test, the subject that brought Robinson's Friday testimony to an abrupt close.

Fortson implied that he had set up a private polygraph for Robinson, to which Gupta objected on the grounds that Robinson had not been directed to take a private polygraph, only one that was administered by the district.

Another issue with the polygraph came up when the district called investigator Mary Finlayson for a third time. According to law, before a polygraph test is administered to any public employee, the employer has to assure the employee that the questions will only be pertaining to the employee's job and duties, which is something Finlayson said she was not aware of and did not tell Robinson before giving him orders to take the test.

Again, Fortson questioned Finlayson about the thoroughness of her investigation. And again, Finlayson testified that once Cobb Police took over the investigation, she was directed not to talk to any further witnesses - a directive Finlayson said she took very seriously.

In his closing statements to the tribunal, Fortson said he was stunned that the district had not done a more thorough investigation of the allegations against Robinson. He said he could not understand Finlayson's approach to the case and how she could believe Robinson was guilty after only speaking to him and one of his accusers.

Gupta, in closing, said Robinson "was deceptive, he was evasive and he lied." She told the tribunal to remember that this isn't just about one girl, but two, and that the tribunal has the power to make sure a case like this never happens again in Cobb County schools.

Cobb Police arrested Robinson on Dec. 19 and charged him with sexual battery. His arrest warrant stated he "did intentionally make physical contact with the intimate parts of the body of a 17-year-old female without her consent" around 2:30 p.m. on Dec. 8.

In a letter of termination to Robinson, Superintendent Fred Sanderson further detailed the incident saying that the female student was meeting with Robinson in his office that day regarding a scheduling change. During this encounter Robinson allegedly told the student, "You owe me," and then proceeded to fondle her over her clothes, according to the letter. During the school district's investigation, another female high school student came forward claiming that the counselor had made several sexually suggestive comments to her throughout the school year, according to the letter.
Comments
(12)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
no spig. n
|
February 02, 2010
This girl was not kicked off a team, she never tried out because she had surgery during tryouts. Robinson was not in charge of it. This man admits he was close to her and her family, treated her like a daughter, why would she make this up, for what? The woman who made the false claim in the park was arrested for lying, Investigators could tell that her story was full of wholes, just like investigators found these two girls to be telling the truth. No one is a saint, and no one is above wrongdoin. Priets, teachers, police, lawyers, engineers, all have molested children. No one does it around witnesses. Hope it never happesn to your child and everyone turns on you and calls your child a liar. Investigators have training and experience that Board members do not, so how about letting them do their job and make the findings!!!!
Too many liars
|
February 02, 2010
Isn't it "innocent until proven guilty"? Well we just had a lockdown a couple of days ago because a woman CLAIMED she was attacked at Harrison Park.

Now it was all a BIG FAT LIE. Why would someone make up such a story? Lack of ATTENTION?

So why don't we give Coach Robinson a chance.

Remember Twana Brawley, if not, look it up and she what she claimed was done to her and how she almost ruined the lives of innocent college students.

This girl is new at Lassiter, has she has made similar claims in the past? Now don't you think there would have been more claims made against coach other than this girls friend?

HOPEFULLLLLLLLLLLL
|
February 01, 2010
Well to all of the HATERS who are against coach robinson, GUESS WHAT????????????????????????

HE GETS HIS JOB BACK! The school board/justice system is finally doing their job. This man in innocent and I am glad that got to see that he is in fact innocent. The kids at Lassiter love him because we know what kind of man he truly is. Coach Robinson is not a Monster!
Just a thought.
|
January 29, 2010
Nina Gupta comment that Mr. Robinson treats the school like his own personal single's bar although crafted in a very clever manner really does nothing to further the case. Lawyers typically use inflamtory phrases when they have a lack of evidence. Regarding the polygraph, please don't forget that the school board does not have the legal right to order someone to take that exam (5th amendment and all that Constitutional stuff that Nina forgot about). But hey you guys get 2 million dollars a year so you better bury this guy or lose your illegal contract.
Not in my school
|
January 28, 2010
If you east Cobb parents think that a cell tower is dangerous to your kids, then how about a counselor at your school who is out on bail for a sex offense? Not in my backyard.
Would You Hire Him?
|
January 28, 2010
Would anyone in their right mind hire someone who'd recently been arrested for this? There's no way that Cobb parents would tolerate it if Robinson were hired today, knowing that he'd just been arrested. Why then should he continue to be employed? Would you send your children to a school that hired someone who's out on bond for sexual battery against a student???
Probable Cause
|
January 28, 2010
To Really Parents: Let's not lose sight of the fact that the Cobb Police (not the school system) have already convinced a judge (again not part of the school system) that there is probable cause, and that the judge has already issued an arrest warrant.
Fixed
|
January 28, 2010
Of course he'll be fired. His fate was sealed before he was even asked one question. The next time CCSD treats an accused employee fairly will be the first. Why not suspend him and see what happens in the courts? Because if the DA presents the same case we saw here there's no way an impartial jury will buy it, that's why. Even a typically inept Brock Clay attorney couldn't lose a case when their clients are the jurors.
Really parents?
|
January 28, 2010
I do not know if Mr.Robinson did or did not do this. What I find amazing is that there are three posts stating you would not want your children anywhere near someone who has been accused. If a student lies because they are angray about not getting on a team, you think a teacher should lose their certificate and be fired because a student said so? There is no evidence to prove he did any of these things. Several students said they were with this girl in his office. They stated the door was never closed. In addition, I wouldn't want Cobb Counties personal polygraph examiner giving me a test either. The county has too many people under their thumb for me to belive anything they say it true.
Concerned Parent
|
January 28, 2010
As a concerned parent, I don't want anyone who's been arrested for a sexual offense anywhere near my child.
Henry Clay
|
January 28, 2010
The Board should err on the side of caution by protecting our children from people who have been arrested for sexual battery on students. If we can't trust the Board to at least do that, then what can we trust them to do?
John C. Calhoun
|
January 28, 2010
I believe Mr. Robinson is guilty. He refused to take a polygraph and the victim passed her polygraph. Do not put this man near my children!
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.