Readers debate the Cobb School Board and charges of calendar coercion
December 16, 2009 01:00 AM | 795 views | 7 7 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DEAR EDITOR:

After many hours of pondering how to begin this letter, I can only sum it up with one word: appalling! I have watched school board meetings, far too many, and continue to walk away from them shaking my head in disbelief at the preplanned, game-playing and self-aggrandizing actions that are played out to the audience and public viewers.

Thursday night my jaw dropped to the floor as I watched the unprofessional group of people that we call our school board hold an outright public flailing of a fellow board member, Alison Bartlett. If this kind of behavior occurred at one of our schools by a bunch of students, these students would have been hauled into the principal's office and suspended for bullying.

Furthermore, this school board has yet again violated the policies. Under Board Conduct, any issue that one has with a fellow board member will be addressed in private. For Chairman Dr. John Abraham to have allowed each of the board members to make a statement and then for each of those members to have the audacity to attack Ms. Bartlett was a gross negligence on his part in handling this board and following policy. As chairman, one of his responsibilities (please read the job responsibilities) is to ensure that deliberations will be fair, open and thorough. I feel that this was far from fair. It was unnecessary and destructive to all involved.

What right does any of the board have in casting the first stone? Dr. Crooks cast the first stone with his sermon on morality. Let's see, he is currently being recalled for his lack of integrity, lying and deception. Board members Lynnda Crowder-Eagle and Holli Cash claimed they had received hundreds of e-mails favoring the Standards Based Report Cards, but they were unable to provide them after an Open Records request.

I call this deception and lying. David Banks and Abraham both ran on tickets claiming to support a later school start date. But is that what they voted for? No! I would call that deceiving voters and lying. As the saying goes, people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. I urge Chairman Abraham to review board conduct before he yet again violates the policies. When he hands down his reprimand, I believe that does not need to be rehearsed and aired in public, it needs to be addressed in private!

Ms. Bartlett, thank you for taking a stand with this board and for asking the tough questions before rubber stamping everything on which you are required to vote. I believe that she stands for integrity and I believe that she is making changes. Continue to do the job that your constituents elected you to do.

I also believe that the issue that she brought to the last meeting could have been handled more professionally by the board and Mr. Sanderson, and not turned into a witch hunt that affected administrators across the entire school district. Ms. Bartlett held those teachers' comments in confidence, protecting their privacy and potentially their jobs, and for that she should have been commended.

We expect that those who hold public office to exhibit the highest standards and ethical conduct. I hope that the next time we vote we take this into consideration.

Kim Swanson
East Cobb
Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Cobb Mom
|
December 16, 2009
Well said, Kim! You have summed up my thoughts almost verbatim. "Let he without sin cast the first stone." Crooks ought to know that one first hand if he is a preacher man. As for Banks, he doesn't have the support of his post, Abraham is a lying, deceitful power monger and Cash and Crowder-Eagle, well, they don't have enough sense between the two of them other than to mimic the ill-advised men following and a third-rate attorney (Brock). Hope to see a large turnout at the meeting in January!
Still shell shocked
|
December 16, 2009
I have tried to bring myself to type a letter but just can't seem to find the words to begin what I feel about the horrible behavior of our school board and their "Borg" mentality. One statement that I'm surprised no one has spoken about (or at least I haven't seen) is the one by Cash and Crooks that compared what was going on to the "loss of a child"! They obviously have not lost a child! To compare what was going on to such a tragic event shows the total insensitivity and ineptitude of these members.
Ignoring SACS
|
December 16, 2009
As worthless as I think SACS is... judging by the fact they didn't sanction CCSD for past transgressions, I am even more perplexed how CCSB can totally disregard their advice on providing a more positive outlook to the community at large. No doubt, CCSD and CCSB are held in a negative light by many parents and teachers THROUGHOUT the county. We are patiently waiting for election time to show you what we think of the board members. You will see that we are more than a "loud minority".
Rebuseye
|
December 16, 2009
I am not personally involved in any aspect of the school board/school administration uproar, but I have followed the many articles and letters having a say about it. It is obvious that there is trouble here in "River City," but I'm having doubts that all this blowing of trombones will bring effectiveness and tranquility to our school system.

With so many people pushing pet projects (or objecting to the same), there is almost no chance that reason could prevail if, indeed, reason was finally offered. But, my primary objective in writing is to add some thoughts on future school board elections: Most of the school board members are relatively new and were largely elected to replace some (but not all)previous members who were generally considered to be incompetent. Now this group is under similar assault. Who will be willing to seek election to a board that is constantly under attack? Most normal people will want no part of group that has little chance of accomplishing anything worthwhile. Type "A" personalities might like the challenge, but it appears to me that this may be the problem presently: too many prima donnas. Probably, many willing to run for the board either have their own agendas, or are trying to use it as a stepping-stone to greater glory.

My main point is that if we keep vilifying the board and its members, we are likely to end up with more of the same next time around.
Amen!
|
December 16, 2009
I couldn't have said it any better Mrs. Swanson. Just in case anyone from the CCSD Board or the Central office is reading this, just know that your perception that these types of sentiments only exist as a result of the "loud minority" which is presumed to be from E. Cobb, just know that you are wrong. I live in S. Cobb, and I share many of the same sentiments about your appalling behavior at the last Board meeting, and your general uninformed seat-of-the pants decision making.
rita Jones
|
December 16, 2009
I've started this blog 3 times, but the bottom line is:

I'm just astonished at the audacity of this board.
Abramawitz
|
December 16, 2009
The board loves to hear themselves talk and do not like people saying things they do not like so why not a personal attack. It just feels right, doesn't it? Keeps in the spirit of the season
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.