I thought about this when I saw last week's Cobb County school board meeting. A number of principals were accused of "coercing" teachers to vote in favor of the balanced calendar on a district-sponsored online poll.
The charge was originally leveled at the November meeting by board member Allison Bartlett, who claimed hearing from teachers at five schools (which she later changed to two). Chairman John Abraham requested an investigation be launched.
The results were revealed and investigator Dr. Linda Bernknopf found the vote took place "without any effort to coerce."
Two of the most impressive results were the interviews with the education groups PAGE and CCAE, both of which said they receive multiple complaints a week from teachers about principals but had received none on this issue. And the fact that one of the implicated principals was actually out of town during the online polling period.
But will these principal's good names ever really be cleared? Can anyone's reputation truly be restored after being accused? Fellow principals turned out in droves to speak and stand in support of their peers that night. I think this was the most moving part of this entire episode. I wonder how many of us would receive such an honor? However, there will always be that element in society, those who look for a conspiracy under every rock, who will continue to believe in their guilt in the face of the evidence. Simply because they were accused.
The "conspiracy theorists" who find refuge in anonymity on the blogs will cause the fog to never lift. My heart goes out to the innocent. When their names are "Googled" this will come up and follow them when they look for other employment. Every employer is looking for the squeaky clean.
We all make mistakes. Your humble columnist has made as many as any reader. However, I've found that the public is very good about forgiveness, because we're all faulted and need that absolution ourselves. I believe what people look for is strength of character to stand up and take personal accountability for those mistakes. To say, "I'm sorry. I'll do better next time."
It's obvious Ms. Bartlett is very dedicated to her job. But with all due respect, I think it's time she put her "big girl pants" on and say that she confused second-hand, or third-hand, rumor with fact. She did not take the time to truly check things out before making some career-altering accusations. When she sat up on that podium in November and made that statement, she was not sitting around with a bunch of friends gossiping. She had a higher responsibility. One as an elected official and one in which she should have been aware of the burden of slander. No parsing of the word "coerced" is going to absolve her of this responsibility.
And to those who knowingly perpetrate false rumors (in this instance and others) without regard to how it can destroy lives, I suggest they look in the mirror. While doing so, proudly proclaim "I'm an honest person. I make the world a better place and I am a great role model for my children."
How does that resound in your soul? No wonder so much of this takes place subversively. You only get one reputation in life. It's difficult to build, impossible to rebuild.
Let's all please remember this before we throw stones at anyone. Because those stones can have powerful ripples.
JoEllen Smith is an education activist and freelance writer in east Cobb.













Follow us on Twitter!
Just another example of your narcassistic arrogance. It must be tiring having everything revolve around you and your opinion.
I have heard Ms. Bartlett ask tough questions on budget issues only to be put off by her colleagues on the board. I have heard Ms. Bartlett speak to legislative relations only to be put off by her fellow colleagues. (Interestingly enough, the most vocal of these colleagues on legislative issues could not be bothered to meet face to face with the Cobb County legislative delegation this week.) The plain and simple of this is that this body is a billion dollar bureaucracy that needs people who are going to look out for all of the constituents, not just the people they sit at the board table with.
Thank you for taking the high road Ms. Smith and pointing out the obvious - Ms. Bartlett made a mistake by repeating hearsay as fact. As a public official she is held to a higher standard than the "community" members who like to bend her ear. That is why their forum is limited to the MDJ blogs and her forum is the BOE meeting.
We all make mistakes and we all have the capacity to forgive. Ms. Bartlett should be smart enough to understand that she is falling on the sword of arrogance, not principle. She should account for her mistake by apologizing to the people she hurt, pledge to exercise better judgement in the future, and ask the public to forgive her.
Rallying her friends to blog on her behalf will only serve to aggravate the situation further. Do the right thing Ms. Bartlett and take accountability for what you did.
The complaint should've been passed to the chairman and the board members representing the offending principals AS WELL AS the superintendent per the board's policy (which she broke). Even if it were true that Mr. Sanderson had successfully hypnotized all of his principals to coerce their teachers, the representative board members would've known and the impact of the survey on their vote would have been diminished.
As to the CCEA, PAGE and GAE representation, the assertion that they don't really work FOR teachers but rather are SPIES for the CCSD is absurd. CCEA reps in schools ARE teachers!
Another poster claimed a principal had pro-balanced calender teachers speak of their support in a faculty meeting. Personally, I wouldn't consider that coercion. But they certainly have the right to file that complaint with ANY of their three representative organizations ANONYMOUSLY!
I don't normally agree with Jo Ellen's take on things... but this time, she's gotten it right!
I'm embarrassed for you and for them.
One fact, which I can readily accept, is that the author has made as many mistakes as any reader. Writing this column adds one more to the list. Two of the more glaring errors here are that Bartlett accused anyone of anything. Bartlett related what was told to her. That is precisely what she should have done. As to bringing it to the Superintendent, that is laughable, since he is the one behind the cocercion. The second glaring error is that there was an investigation. More properly, what happened was that a "high priced friend and ex-employee of Sanderson was hired to find Sanderson innocent of coercion She went about this by interviewing only those people who were either afraid to tell the truth for fear of losing their jobs or were part of the coercion."
JoEllen, honey,if you think any of our teachers are dumb enough to go to the GEA, CCEA or PAGE, knowing full well it would get back to the CCSD, then you have a very low opinion of the intelligence level of our teachers. Sorry, JoEllen but it appears that you have not only partaken of the CCSD Kool-Aid, but you have also bathed in it.