JoEllen Smith: Damage caused by unfounded charges is hard to undo
by JoEllen Smith
Columnist
December 15, 2009 01:00 AM | 755 views | 16 16 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I recently heard a radio host, a self-proclaimed recovering alcoholic, say that during the holiday season he is very careful to be photographed at parties only drinking water. And he makes sure it's bottled water so it's not mistaken for alcohol, lest anyone think he's fallen off the wagon. How sad. What if someone accused you of being an alcoholic or a prescription drug abuser? A liar or a cheat? I wonder what it would be like to live your life constantly having to prove you "didn't" do something wrong? I guess it would feel like walking on eggs, never daring to lose your temper in public and always having to be perfect at every turn.

I thought about this when I saw last week's Cobb County school board meeting. A number of principals were accused of "coercing" teachers to vote in favor of the balanced calendar on a district-sponsored online poll.

The charge was originally leveled at the November meeting by board member Allison Bartlett, who claimed hearing from teachers at five schools (which she later changed to two). Chairman John Abraham requested an investigation be launched.

The results were revealed and investigator Dr. Linda Bernknopf found the vote took place "without any effort to coerce."

Two of the most impressive results were the interviews with the education groups PAGE and CCAE, both of which said they receive multiple complaints a week from teachers about principals but had received none on this issue. And the fact that one of the implicated principals was actually out of town during the online polling period.

But will these principal's good names ever really be cleared? Can anyone's reputation truly be restored after being accused? Fellow principals turned out in droves to speak and stand in support of their peers that night. I think this was the most moving part of this entire episode. I wonder how many of us would receive such an honor? However, there will always be that element in society, those who look for a conspiracy under every rock, who will continue to believe in their guilt in the face of the evidence. Simply because they were accused.

The "conspiracy theorists" who find refuge in anonymity on the blogs will cause the fog to never lift. My heart goes out to the innocent. When their names are "Googled" this will come up and follow them when they look for other employment. Every employer is looking for the squeaky clean.

We all make mistakes. Your humble columnist has made as many as any reader. However, I've found that the public is very good about forgiveness, because we're all faulted and need that absolution ourselves. I believe what people look for is strength of character to stand up and take personal accountability for those mistakes. To say, "I'm sorry. I'll do better next time."

It's obvious Ms. Bartlett is very dedicated to her job. But with all due respect, I think it's time she put her "big girl pants" on and say that she confused second-hand, or third-hand, rumor with fact. She did not take the time to truly check things out before making some career-altering accusations. When she sat up on that podium in November and made that statement, she was not sitting around with a bunch of friends gossiping. She had a higher responsibility. One as an elected official and one in which she should have been aware of the burden of slander. No parsing of the word "coerced" is going to absolve her of this responsibility.

And to those who knowingly perpetrate false rumors (in this instance and others) without regard to how it can destroy lives, I suggest they look in the mirror. While doing so, proudly proclaim "I'm an honest person. I make the world a better place and I am a great role model for my children."

How does that resound in your soul? No wonder so much of this takes place subversively. You only get one reputation in life. It's difficult to build, impossible to rebuild.

Let's all please remember this before we throw stones at anyone. Because those stones can have powerful ripples.

JoEllen Smith is an education activist and freelance writer in east Cobb.
Comments
(16)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Alan Faircloth
|
December 17, 2009
To Outstanding - I KNOW you were generalizing and by doing so, I am one of the many who do not see (well, actually do not agree) with Smith's assessment and thus, to use your words, must have a deep rooted hatred of the school system. But thanks the for the color commentary at the end. I was wondering what was wrong with me and you've now cleared it up. Thanks Doc!
Reply to Alan
|
December 16, 2009
Honestly, I was generalizing - I wasn't talking about you Alan, why would you think I was talking about you?

Just another example of your narcassistic arrogance. It must be tiring having everything revolve around you and your opinion.

J.G.R.
|
December 16, 2009
As someone who has watched Cobb County board meetings fairly regularly, I am amzed that any member of an elected body would be chastised so thoroughly by their colleagues because they do not tow the party line on every issue. It has been my observation that Ms. Bartlett asks tough questions and makes thoughtful comments regarding any number of issues. Regardless of your position on this particular issue, I think we should all be glad that at the very least, one board member takes his or her duty to the electorate seriously enough to speak up even when they know they will be a lone voice.

I have heard Ms. Bartlett ask tough questions on budget issues only to be put off by her colleagues on the board. I have heard Ms. Bartlett speak to legislative relations only to be put off by her fellow colleagues. (Interestingly enough, the most vocal of these colleagues on legislative issues could not be bothered to meet face to face with the Cobb County legislative delegation this week.) The plain and simple of this is that this body is a billion dollar bureaucracy that needs people who are going to look out for all of the constituents, not just the people they sit at the board table with.
Alan Faircloth
|
December 16, 2009
To OUTSTANDING - I take great offense to your supposition that I have a deep rooted hatred of the Cobb School System. If that were really true, I would not have my kids attending Cobb Schools. An excessively broad brush has been used to paint anyone that opposes the Board's actions and conduct (including those that comprised the 51 violations of the GA Gov't Sunshine Laws) as hating the school system. Heck, I don't even hate the board members, but I can guarantee you I oppose and despise their actions and conduct. If they would ever have mended their ways, I'd be behind them 100%.
Outstanding
|
December 15, 2009
Wow, a well-written and grounded assessment of what anyone not fueled by deep rooted hatred for the school district can see.

Thank you for taking the high road Ms. Smith and pointing out the obvious - Ms. Bartlett made a mistake by repeating hearsay as fact. As a public official she is held to a higher standard than the "community" members who like to bend her ear. That is why their forum is limited to the MDJ blogs and her forum is the BOE meeting.

We all make mistakes and we all have the capacity to forgive. Ms. Bartlett should be smart enough to understand that she is falling on the sword of arrogance, not principle. She should account for her mistake by apologizing to the people she hurt, pledge to exercise better judgement in the future, and ask the public to forgive her.

Rallying her friends to blog on her behalf will only serve to aggravate the situation further. Do the right thing Ms. Bartlett and take accountability for what you did.

Interesting
|
December 15, 2009
I love how authors throw the word "fact" around as if it's some sort of immutable chemistry equation that isn't (often) built from assumption, hearsay, and induction, esp. in matters such as this. We don't really know whether teachers were coerced or not ... the "investigator" didn't really do an investigation and the ex-Principal was unlikely to have a 3rd party disinterest, but I can't be certain. The best part of the Board's decision was how 51% was "overwhelming" support and the basis was an untested, non peer-reviewed dissertation. Alison was willing to test the party line - for that I give her credit.
Alan Faircloth
|
December 15, 2009
First, if you place any reliance on an investigation conducted by Bernknopf, we need to have you tested. Second, while I agree some don't post their names, there is always that possibility of reprisal (shhhh...Abraham is still in denial about this). Please note I post my name and anything I say here, I've said to the Board members directly. As for Ms. Bartlett, checking things out is what she was doing. She revealed "information" not rumor and said let's investigate or look into this. Of course, I think she was expecting a more objective and independent investigation not something reminiscent of a Kangaroo court. And I agree with Ms. Bartlett that Fred certainly won't be accused of being responsive. Oh, and regarding the principals, how is they came with well prepared and clearly rehearsed speeches about false or inaccurate statements by Ms. Bartlett when the results of the investigation (concluding such) were, according to Abraham, not known until executive session? Either they have crystal balls or something more sinister was in play. My bet is on the latter given the probabilities of the former being true.
Education Advocate
|
December 15, 2009
Oh, you're an education activist all right, Jo Ellen. Unbelievable. Your "story" is filled with pure supposition. You're "active" before gathering the facts. Or maybe you're just as gullible as the principals that fell for the line, "Bartlett said calls came from your schools...". What BS. Those schools were never mentioned by Bartlett. CCSD hand-picked them to rile up parents against her. Bartlett is the only one on the raised dais that is looking out for teachers, staff, and students. The others are in it for themselves.
Big D
|
December 15, 2009
Well said article. Anyone who tries to say that Alison didn't make an accusation is simply naive or stupid. It was clear to everyone else.

The complaint should've been passed to the chairman and the board members representing the offending principals AS WELL AS the superintendent per the board's policy (which she broke). Even if it were true that Mr. Sanderson had successfully hypnotized all of his principals to coerce their teachers, the representative board members would've known and the impact of the survey on their vote would have been diminished.

As to the CCEA, PAGE and GAE representation, the assertion that they don't really work FOR teachers but rather are SPIES for the CCSD is absurd. CCEA reps in schools ARE teachers!

Another poster claimed a principal had pro-balanced calender teachers speak of their support in a faculty meeting. Personally, I wouldn't consider that coercion. But they certainly have the right to file that complaint with ANY of their three representative organizations ANONYMOUSLY!

I don't normally agree with Jo Ellen's take on things... but this time, she's gotten it right!

W Cobb Mom
|
December 15, 2009
Dear W. Cobb Teacher - You have a civic duty, as well as other teachers, to come forward and convey what you know. This will open the eyes of many, including our Superintendant, that choose to spend our tax dollars on his cronies to clear him. It will also send a VITAL message to those Boardmembers with the audacity to cast stones from their glass houses. PLEASE come forward now and give Ms. Bartlett the backup she needs to bring this full circle.
Crystal Ball Reader
|
December 15, 2009
At the school board meeting on Nov. 11, Bartlett did not have a hidden agenda in her communication to the Board when she announced she had received phone calls from teachers saying they were coerced into voting for the balanced schedule and that a few principals didn't act properly. She showed ethical behavior when she didn’t name names. She was set up by teachers and naive enough to think that they would support her if she mentioned their concerns. Abraham also made this comment, “I was very surprised to get comments in my Post from parents, from principals, and from teachers, a number of things teachers have said to me, I was surprised that 51% voted for a balanced calendar.” Does that mean he had a problem with the way the survey was handled or question whether the survey count was accurate? Why wasn't he grilled and asked to identify teachers he talked to? Ask yourself, "Why was Bartlett left to carry the cross alone?"
Terry Smith
|
December 15, 2009
Jo Ellen you are a self righteous person - the real "stoning" was from the other board members at the Thursday's night show.

I'm embarrassed for you and for them.

CzechMate
|
December 15, 2009
Bravo to Mrs. Smith for calling out Bartlett's lack of contrition. She owes the principals and support workers at the school district a massive apology for incorrectly and wrongly assuming wrongdoing. Nothing in the school system is perfect, but these conspiracy theories and constant attacks are beyond old.
Steve Rhinehart
|
December 15, 2009
The facts in this piece are so scant as to require a fine toothed comb to ferret them out.

One fact, which I can readily accept, is that the author has made as many mistakes as any reader. Writing this column adds one more to the list. Two of the more glaring errors here are that Bartlett accused anyone of anything. Bartlett related what was told to her. That is precisely what she should have done. As to bringing it to the Superintendent, that is laughable, since he is the one behind the cocercion. The second glaring error is that there was an investigation. More properly, what happened was that a "high priced friend and ex-employee of Sanderson was hired to find Sanderson innocent of coercion She went about this by interviewing only those people who were either afraid to tell the truth for fear of losing their jobs or were part of the coercion."

JoEllen, honey,if you think any of our teachers are dumb enough to go to the GEA, CCEA or PAGE, knowing full well it would get back to the CCSD, then you have a very low opinion of the intelligence level of our teachers. Sorry, JoEllen but it appears that you have not only partaken of the CCSD Kool-Aid, but you have also bathed in it.
good advice
|
December 15, 2009
Thanks Ms. Smith, fine words of advice, wouldn't it be nice if the very newspaper where your article is printed would follow your advice! Maybe then we would be making some progress in this community.
A Teacher in W. Cobb
|
December 15, 2009
It did happen! I was there and it will come out soon. You speak of things that are far beyond your knowledge or pay grade. Teachers, in my school, were asked to stand and explain to their fellow teachers and the principal why they supported the balanced calendar.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.