Don McKee: Censure Bartlett? Abraham and his cohorts in the wrong
by Don McKee
Columnist
December 14, 2009 01:00 AM | 1727 views | 16 16 comments | 20 20 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Cobb school board chairman John Abraham, not content with siccing a police offi cer on a parent with opposing views, now wants to censure a board member for trying to blow the whistle on the district's flawed survey on the highly controversial "balanced" school calendar adopted last month.

Old Iron Fist Abraham allowed that he's going to recommend the board censure Alison Bartlett, claiming she violated policy by not taking her contentions about coercion of teachers by some principals to Superintendent Fred Sanderson.

Several board members went ahead and did their own censuring of Bartlett after a report from Dr. Linda Bernknopf, who just happened to be a former Cobb principal, hired to investigate the matter.

Bernknopf said she found no evidence to support Bartlett who had told the board Nov. 11 that staff members from five schools cast suspicion on the integrity of the survey. She said some teachers told her principals had encouraged support for the "balanced calendar" in the non-anonymous survey of district employees.

Bartlett asked the investigator/former principal if she had talked directly to any teachers. Bernknopf said she had not because Bartlett disclosed no names of teachers, only the names of the schools. But many of the principals were insulted, Bernknopf said.

Stop right there.

Why did the investigator need names of teachers? She should have interviewed teachers at the schools as part of her job. Not that it would have mattered: No teacher in her/his right mind was going to squeal on a principal. And what principal was going to admit pressuring a teacher?

So the sleuth talked to the principals at the five schools. No teachers. And no question about the outcome.

That's an investigation?

The "report" was more than enough for board member David Banks to all but call for Bartlett to resign. He told her to evaluate whether she should continue as a member. This from the man who flip-flopped on his campaign promise for a later school start date as did Abraham to carry the "balanced" calendar in a 4-3 vote.

Member Holli Cash quizzed Bartlett on whether she owed the five principals "an apology for not following procedure as a school board member and the way you went about announcing it?"

She should have been asking why the district survey was not anonymous and why parents were not polled. The district said it surveyed all 15,211 employees, including 6,636 classroom teachers and 1,672 special ed teachers, producing 8,400 responses (55 percent of the total employees) and of that number, 51.1 percent (about 4,284) favored the "balanced calendar."

Censure Bartlett? Abraham and his potted plant cohorts are the ones who should be censured for violating state law by voting on matters behind closed doors time and again, by voting on a cell tower contract not on the agenda, by voting in secret to renew the sweetheart contract of district lawyer Glenn Brock, etc.

Alison Bartlett being censured by this board is the bad joke of the year.

dmckee9613@aol.com
Comments
(16)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Need a Leader
|
February 13, 2011
And how was the "Warrior Woman" representing her students/parents when she voted to shut down Oakwood within her post? She didn't know what she was doing - she even had to admit she didn't realize what she was voting for. She is so blinded in her ambition and personal agendas that she can't see the forest through the trees.
Warrior Woman
|
February 04, 2010
Most CCSD employees are not credible on this, and many other, issues. Bartlett is doing her job of representing the students and parents in her area. She refuses to cave to the education oligarchy, and those who care about quality education over pampering ineffective school administrators support her.
stop complaing!
|
December 22, 2009
Don Mckee- it's time you stop writing stuff that is negative abuot the school district. Why dont you write positive things. How about you spin the story how it should be. "Cobb Board takes action against unethical board member". That would be something worth reading! People, Ms. Bartlett is a sorry excuse for a Board Member. Anyone who would speak out about 5 or more principals like this should be removed from the board. I hope the rest of you can wake up and see the truth here. I hope Crooks, Abraham and cash serve another 4 years!
Depublican
|
December 19, 2009
Any wrongdoing by a BOE member of superintendent

should be addressed, but the MDJ invariably picks

the side that serves its anti CCSD agenda. And you

sir are merely a conduit for the publisher's

vitriol.
anonymous
|
December 16, 2009
Wonder if PAGE and GAE have a horse in this race? It wouldn't be prudent to cross Sanderson if you are working against a future pay cut/furlough days....
Steve Rhinehart
|
December 14, 2009
To Big D. I notcie you posted the same kind of foolishness after Pete Borden and Don Mckee's columns both. So, allow me to respond with a one-size-fits-all response. Are your really so gullible as to think that such an organization as

GAE or PAGE is (1) capable of protecting a teacher from Sanderson, or even (2) managing to conceal the identity of a teacher from CCSD. If you really are that gullible, I have several investment opportunities I would like to talk you about. Any CCSD employee, particularly a teacher, who dares to buck Sanderson is toast. Small wonder there were no complaints filed. Small wonder many chose not to even vote, since they knew it would do no good. Vote the way Sasnderson wanted you to and what was the point? Vote your preference and it would not make any difference because you would be out of a job on some trumped up charge, investigated by the bogus investigator they use.

Big D, you need to take off your rese colored glasses and get a look at reality.
WRONG Wrong Wrong
|
December 14, 2009
dear Big D

You know not what you talk about - as a person who spends all day researching data. I know. It is easy to find out anything about someone who hits a site. It can all be recorded!

So knowing how wrong you are in part 2 - I can only imagine how wrong you are in part one.

School Advocate
|
December 14, 2009
So if ANY Board member is proven to be a lier, vote illegally in private sessions, vote on non agenda items and generally lack intellect then they should forced to resign along with the superintendent if he cannot prove that he did not coerce. Just curious, if it is really key in the investigation, as to how many active member PAGE and GAE members are there in Cobb of the 15,2ll employees who were declared the only stakeholders when the Board mandated a "coerced" vote (meaning non anonymous) ? I suggest that of course a non anonymous vote and tracking data base managed by the Superintendent is coerceion by the Board and the Superintendent on the very face

of it.
Bartlett supporter
|
December 14, 2009
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the Board violate the Board Ethics and Code of Conduct by publicly "reprimanding" Mrs. Bartlett? The code specifically states that one recourse they have to address a violation is a private reprimand. The majority on this Board seem to make their own rules to fit their agenda and circumstances.
To Louise
|
December 14, 2009
Hey Louise, Ms. Bartlett is not respected by CCSD employees. Well so what????? Did she deserve to be lynched in public by a bunch of liars and hypocrites...no!!!! Who cares what any CCSD employee thinks...you are the ones that are damaged goods!!!!!! She is not going anywhere it is Abraham, Cash and Crooks that will be hitting the road and hopefully some more lazy CCSD employees too.
Big D
|
December 14, 2009
C'mon, Don! There IS a mechanism for anonymous complaints to be filed by teachers... the, not one, but TWO teacher associations (GAE and PAGE) that ANY of the allegedly-pressured teachers could've contacted via email, telephone or smoke signal for that matter! The point is, that's why those organizations exist. Dr. Bernknopf stated in her report that THIS was the most telling finding of her investigation: that NOT A SINGLE TEACHER HAD CONTACTED THEM WITH A COMPLAINT OR EVEN CONCERN relating to the issue.

Also, when you claim that it was a "non-anonymous survey", you ARE technically correct, but the reality is that it would take some substantial forensics to reveal those identities and votes. MDJ should be ashamed of the way it is orchestrating this latest round of attacks on the teachers, principals, administrators and Board of this school district!
Concerned Parent
|
December 14, 2009
I applaud Ms. Bartlett for bringing to light this issue and am appalled at Chowder-Eagle, Cash, Banks, and Abraham for their comments at the Dec. 11 meeting. In particular, Linda's comment that we don't need negative comments about the CCSD and that she is a cheerleader for the district. Cash will be bringing her pompoms. Gimme a break!! With all the flipflopping, back-room deals, and this calendar vote with the voting date not stated in the school robocall or email, Ms. Bartlett is my hero in bringing this up. The bureaucracy will protect itself, it has nothing to do with kids. The calendar was about teachers, not kids or parents. Who is the school board trying to fool? Contrary to their opinions and actions, parents are NOT idiots. And that is why the school board hates parents and anyone else who speaks out. Without honesty and openness, the school board will continue to rubber stamp anything the supt. and the bureaucracy wants. The so-called investigation was a joke; the fox minding the hen-house, and they expect a different result? The CCDSD Emperor has no clothes. We "peons" must continue to tell it like it is. Bravo Ms. Bartlett!
Wait a Minute, Don!
|
December 14, 2009
A whole column on top of all of the other space dedicated to the most silly issue of 2009, a school calendar?

First, by her OWN ADMISSION, the board member erred in broadcasting her unfound concerns at an inapporpirate time and place and to the wrong audience.

Go back to the tape of the meeting. The member brought up the so called arm twisting in repsonse to her fellow board members using the survey as partial justification for their choice of vote. She was throwing gasoline on to the fire of a small issue being raised by a few very vocal, well orgainzed citizens in an attempt to change the other member's vote. She couldn't change their minds on the issues with logic or any other valid point. She had to resort to what the MDJ has championed over the past several years with watching the Cobb school board: pure rumor and suspect that any issue that does not meet the approval of the vocal,well orgainzed minority who use the MDJ as their personal newsletter, is nothing but wrong, criminal and/or outright lies and deceit.

We have far bigger fish to fry with education in Cobb County than to argue over a few days in the calendar. That is why the great silent majority is so quiet about it. It is a NON-ISSUE.

Move on and let's talk about how the school system is going to fund itself next year when the tax digest will gets reduced in 2010 by as much double digit percentage points! Now that is a real newsworthy topic!

Reba M
|
December 14, 2009
1st Crooks fires Virginia Gregory from a volunteer position, because she did something he didn't like - blew the whistle on his buddies

2nd Abraham gets the police to escort a woman from the podium because she was doing something he didn't like - explaining how he campaigned to get elected on one issue and then voted another way. I'm for the balanced calendar - but that is wrong.

NOW Abraham and the zoo "stone" a fellow board member because she did something they didn't like. Blew the whistle on the way the vote was taken.

These are the 3 ways O know that these men have discrimanated against women. I wonder how many more there are that we just don't know of because people are afraid to speak out.

I'm afraid to speak out, because of reprisals against my kids. This is America people we are supposed to be able to speak our mind.

If I'm afraid and I just have 3 kids in the system, I cannot imagine what it is like to be a teacher.

BAD Example for our kids - we should learn from our leaders not fear them.
WTP
|
December 14, 2009
Yea, what he said!
Louise Felder
|
December 14, 2009
She should step down on her own. She is "damaged goods", not being considered credible by most of the CCSD employees.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.