Teen's father, principal testify
by Kim Isaza
kisaza@mdjonline.com
December 09, 2009 01:00 AM | 3123 views | 5 5 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA - The father of the teenage student involved in a sexual relationship with a teacher at Marietta High School told Cobb Superior Court on Tuesday, "I thought I had raised her better."

Testimony began - and was often interrupted - Tuesday afternoon in the criminal trial of Christopher King, 36, who is charged with one felony count of sexual assault against a person in custody. He was arrested May 27, and quit his job around that same time.

At issue is whether the sexual relationship between King and the student, 17, is illegal. State law allows consent to be used as a defense because the student is over 16, the age of consent in Georgia. The girl, whose name is being withheld by the Journal because she is alleged to be the victim of a sex crime, has testified at previous hearings that the sex was consensual.

Assistant District Attorney Maurice Brown is attempting to show that teenagers do not always make sound decisions, and that even though this student had sex with King voluntarily, she had been manipulated by an adult who was grooming her for a relationship to satisfy himself sexually.

"He led her to believe she was in love," Brown said in his opening, noting that the girl was 17, and King was a married father of two when their physical relationship began.

But Scott Semrau, King's defense lawyer, insisted in his opening statement to the jury of six men and six women that the relationship "was probably a bad idea, probably taboo. But not against the law."

Marietta High principal Leigh Colburn and Marietta Police Detective Paula Cowell were the first two witnesses called by the state.

Both Colburn and the student's father testified about a situation last fall that involved King and the student. A group of journalism students had taken a trip to the University of Georgia in Athens where a few of them, including this girl, were found drinking alcohol. King filed a disciplinary report against the girl and others when they returned to Marietta High, and she served a suspension.

Semrau pointed out that school authorities held the girl accountable for her actions in that incident, to which a visibly perplexed Colburn agreed they did. The girl's father said that during the one brief meeting he had with King last fall, he thanked King for disciplining his daughter in that incident.

Detective Cowell testified about her investigation into the King-student relationship and said the student told her that she did not feel she was being victimized. The two had sex at "a hotel on Barrett Parkway" and other times at his new residence, where he lived after separating from his wife. King now lives less than a mile from the high school where he had taught English and journalism since 2004.

The defense is also taking pains to point out that the student is a bright girl, has always maintained excellent grades, and had a job and her own car. She was a junior enrolled in the International Baccalaureate program at Marietta High at the time of the relationship. Although she is still enrolled there, she is completing her high school diploma through a joint-enrollment program at Kennesaw State University.

The trial will continue this morning before Judge Robert Flournoy III.
Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
robert d. johnson
|
April 20, 2011
head and crew are typical of most all georgia prosecutors in that they want to push their puritanical values off on everyone else. this is the bible belt.a vast majority of their cases are disposed of by plea agreement. they pile charge after charge on a defendant and bully them into a plea bargain. the accused is penalized for taking the case to a jury by getting a more severe sentence. they can hide behind absolute immunity like the cowards that they are. these kind of prosecutorial senanigans should not be tolerated. thank god head will be gone soon.
Angry, Angry, Angry
|
December 09, 2009
I raised my daughter to be better than that? What the ..... Hello she is 17 years old being manipulated by a grown man. I don't care how you raised her, she made a mistake out of pressure from a person that was supposed to be her leader. I think the teacher is 100% guilty. I don't care if the girl threw her naked body at him, he was a teacher and he should know better, he is the adult her. Not her. Even if it was consentually I dont agree it is ok it to happen. As a teacher you are held to higher standards than others, if you can't meet those standards then quit teaching. I expect my pastor to have higher standards than most, and I would expect teachers of my childer to have higher standards too. I am ill about this whole thing. I pity the 17 year old child that was victimized here.
What logic?
|
December 09, 2009
Of course when hypocrites Pat Head or Maurice Brown are prosecuting a 16-year old suddenly they prosecute the defendant like an adult and they urge the judge to sentence the teenager like an adult. Not a peep about sometimes teenagers make bad choices.
Former Pat Supporter
|
December 09, 2009
What is Pat Head doing prosecuting a case that he knows is not a crime? Yeah, I get it, we don't want teachers having sex with students. However, this is an abuse of power. I thought prosecutors were bound by an oath to uphold the law, not use it to advance your own personal beliefs.
Kim Huffman
|
December 09, 2009
Maurice Brown, Assistant D.A. is "trying to show that teens don't always make good decisions"..compared to who, adults?

Maybe Tiger Woods and his harem can show what good adult decision making is...

How old was the "Virgin Mary" when she took up with Joseph? as she was impregnated by "the holy spirit" ( screams statutory rape to me ).

If the law is 17, then, thats the law. Change the law if it inappropriate, instead of following this flimsy proprietorial gambit
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.