Forget flu: What's needed is vaccine against socialism
November 04, 2009 01:00 AM | 495 views | 2 2 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DEAR EDITOR:

The pandemic that's sweeping the United States is not only swine flu, folks. It's actually something more sinister and devastating. And you can't counter its debilitating harm through inoculation by needle or a nose spray. No, this insidious disease is impervious to a medical fix and it will eventually effect and infect every single American.

The spread of this disease began in earnest on Jan. 20, Inauguration Day. Just a few months preceding that fateful day, we were forewarned of the oncoming disease when presidential candidate Obama explained to Joe the plumber, a small business owner concerned with future tax increases under an Obama administration, that his administration wished to merely spread the wealth, or level the playing field, so to speak. A small step toward socialism, but now we are experiencing giant steps in this regard.

In less than a year of his administration, we have witnessed the government takeover of major segments of the automobile industry, banking institutions, a stimulus package that stimulated nothing but higher unemployment rates, stagnation and deeper national debt.

Now this administration is hell bent on nationalizing health care, again to spread the wealth and health, so to speak. We can't even sustain the coffers for Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security, much less taking on another trillion-dollar socialistic boondoggle. Then there's cap-and-trade, which promises to reduce our carbon footprint at the price of increased energy costs for everyone and restrictions to industrial productivity.

No, what this country needs is a giant conservative inoculation at the election polls beginning in 2010 and another follow-on conservative inoculation in 2012. Socialism is already plaguing our nation and the sickness will continue until we insist on pursuing a life of liberty and prosperity without this dreaded disease of socialism.

Bob Lanzotti
Smyrna
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Indian Joe
|
November 06, 2009
Bob, you and SW Gal are absolutely right. But the problem is the bloc vote by those who are more and more depending on the government (tax payers actually) to support them. Do you really think they are going to vote against those great people who are "looking out for them"? And as unemployment continues to rise, their numbers will also increase, because after all it was their rep/senator who got the benefits extended for them. It is not sour grapes, but I firmly believe this was the goal of the winning candidate in 2008. It is not so slowly but surely coming into focus that the "hope and change" was a country run completely by and the people subservient to the government. I am just wondering if there is anyone out there, who actually works, pays taxes and their own way, who will speak up for the travesity that is taking place in America. Too many have been shut down for fear of being called racist or a bigot. I blieve the future of this country is a much bgger concern than labels being thrown around for the sole purpose of trying to shut people up.
SW Gal
|
November 04, 2009
Bob,your comments come at an opportune time. we couldn't agree with you more. Where has Socialism ever worked? Our country "has been" the greatest country on earth until politicians in Washington and this current administration started dismantling our freedoms faster than anything in the history of the world. We must "hang tough" locally and at state level as a start. Actively write the liberal media even if your letter isn't published (it will still make a difference.) This is the week to STAND UP against this atrocious "OBAMACARE/Pelosicare." This egregious bill even pays for people who are here illegally! (Thank you, Sheriff Warren, for protecting Marietta and enforcing 287G and pushing E-verify to help stop such outrages.)

These items from the Pelosi bill should SCARE everyone.

—Section 202(c) prohibits the sale of private individual health insurance policies, beginning in 2013, forcing individuals to purchase coverage through the federal government

Page 110—Section 222(e) requires the use of federal dollars to fund abortions through the government-run health plan—and, if the Hyde Amendment were ever not renewed, would require the plan to fund elective abortions

Page 111—Section 223 establishes a new board of federal bureaucrats (the “Health Benefits Advisory Committee”) to dictate the health plans that all individuals must purchase—and would likely require all Americans to subsidize and purchase plans that cover any abortion.These are but a few. **Call your representative and complain loudly and often THIS WEEK or it might be too late! Tell them: "NOT this "Pelosi" version and NOT the Baucus Bill." Look to people like our own Rep./Dr. Tom Price and other "voices of reason" who have suggested workable solutions that DON'T cost TRILLIONS of dollars!



*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.