County releases parks list
by Katy Ruth Camp
krcamp@mdjonline.com
October 26, 2009 01:00 AM | 2256 views | 13 13 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
COBB COUNTY - County officials on Monday released a list of recommended pieces of property for the 2008 parks bond program.

The parks bond citizens advisory committee created the list, which includes 29 parcels ranked within three size categories. Although 13 of the recommended tracts are in east Cobb, John Pape, chairman of the citizens committee, said, "We were looking for properties spread as evenly as possible across the county, and were more open-minded to unique opportunities for greenspace parks."

A 161.61-acre tract of land off Dallas Highway at Lost Mountain in west Cobb is one of those unique opportunities. Pape said the idea for the top-ranked property was to create another mountain walking trail park akin to Kennesaw Mountain State Park.

"The tract would lead you all the way to the top of the mountain with some incredible views. The next prioritized tract at Wigley Road is at Sweat Mountain (in northeast Cobb), so the same idea is behind that. These tracts had all of the features we wanted, and could really serve a thriving community," Pape said.

Not all 29 recommended parcels will be approved by the Cobb County Board of Commissioners, as the total cost exceeds the $40 million bond, which was approved by 67 percent of voters in November 2008. Public Services Director Bob Ash, along with the county's chairman and commissioners, will likely visit the suggested tracts over the next 30 to 45 days and will discuss the properties together in executive session before publicly voting on which will become parks.

Pape said the 15-member committee had a much harder task this year than it did during the first parks bond process in 2006. While 90 properties were submitted and considered in 2006, Pape said 340 properties were considered during the current process.

The county contacted the owners of each of the properties to make sure they passed the criteria of being willing sellers, which narrowed the list down to 244 tracts. Pape said the committee then narrowed the list down to 60 parcels, which the members personally visited throughout the summer.

"Some of the features we looked for in the tracts of land were topography, terrain, water features, trees and the needs of the neighborhood," Pape said. "They weren't discounted completely if all portions of the criteria were not met, but there was a points system for each item that would then benefit the total."

Jolynn Sockwell of the 1,900-member Friends of Concord Park group, whose parcel at Floyd, Hicks and Concord roads did not make the committee's list of recommendations, said they will now begin to appeal to the board of commissioners for consideration of the parcel.

Committee members felt the community in Sockwell's area would be better served with the recommended property nearby at the East-West Connector and Fontaine Road, Pape said.

"We just felt it was an overall better piece of land for a park, and by the time the advocates for the Floyd Road property came to us, we really had already considered the property and decided to not include it as we moved forward with our decisions," Pape said. "We decided that we couldn't go back on our decision simply because an advocacy group came in late and appealed to us, as another group could then come in and make its appeals, and it would just be back and forth."

Pape will present the list of recommended park spaces to the board and the public at Tuesday night's Board of Commissioners meeting. Cobb County spokesman Robert Quigley said board members will probably comment on the process and commend the committee members for their efforts, but will not comment on specific parcels of land.

"These people have volunteered their time for the last nine months or so to create this list, going out to the tracts of land across the county and spending countless hours in meetings or contemplating their decisions," Quigley said of the citizens' committee. "It's really a great deal of work, but now it will be up to the Board of Commissioners to decide which parcels will officially be approved for park space."
Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Pinestream
|
November 19, 2009
In South Cobb, Stout Park has 88 acres. With the purchase of the Stana Property of 137 acres directly adjacent to Stout Park, the combined greenspace is now at 225 acres - larger than Piedmont Park. Additionally, if the County purchases the 80-88 parcel at 5151 Brownsville Road, directly adjacent to both Stout Park and the Stana Property, the combined size of this park will be over 300 acres in one neat, combined parcel of greenspace. Additionally, land is cheaper in South Cobb per acre than it is in North Cobb - which is why there will be all of these so-called "pocket parks" up in North Cobb. It will be easier for the County to maintain a 300 acre park in one location than it will be to service 15 "pocket parks" in North Cobb. And, hopefully, the ability to maintain these parks with taxpayer dollars will be considered by the committee. The County really needs to issue some municipal bonds to fund the purchases and for the maintenance of all of the purchases from 2006 and 2008.
Vinings
|
October 28, 2009
Looks like Vinings and the Smyrna area getting hosed. Only a 2.5 acre tract, and it's near the bottom of the priority list. Is this really the only option for the entire area?
Hey Typical Cobb
|
October 28, 2009
More than 137 acres ( Stana Property)was bought in Southwest Cobb with the first 40 million dollar bond. Its adjacent to the 88-acre Stout Park. The combined 225 acres makes this area larger than Piedmont Park. They also bought another property in South Cobb that totaled 15.5 acres (Henderson Property)

East Cobb Parks
|
October 27, 2009
Only one park in East Cobb? I live in East Cobb and can count 9 parks in our part of the county convenient to me. Check the Cobb Parks and Recreation web site to see all of your options. All communities want parks in their area; however, green space and recreation facilities really should be spread evenly throughout the county to develop a county attractive to families and businesses.
Austell/Mableton
|
October 27, 2009
I attended numerous parks bonds meetings in support of green space in the South Cobb area because the parks in this part of the county are baseball, football, and soccer, no green space for family enjoyment. At the initial meetings there were several properties with green space (many with water features) and willing sellers. I also attended town hall meetings. Yes the committee had a hard job and their work is appreciated; however, the scale does not seem to be balanced.
East cobber
|
October 27, 2009
I have my kids playing at school playgrounds in the summer because there is not enough green space in East Cobb - we have 1 park - and East Cobbers paid for it with raised funds and donate items. It is time we get some of the green space that I see in other parts of the county - go green space go!
Bubba Jones
|
October 27, 2009
In response to Typical Cobb: Perhaps folks in North Cobb are willing to have their land become a park, whereas folks in South Cobb are not. Truly our commissioners only deal with folks willing to have their land converted into a park. It doesn't have anything to do with North vs. South Cobb. Some folks in South Cobb may have changed their minds.

Also, this is quite a drawn out dialectical process not an impetuous one. If you don't like the process contact your commissioner. Your venting here is meaningless and childish sounding.
CitizenV
|
October 27, 2009
Where's Leslie Knope when you need her?
justthinkin
|
October 27, 2009
If the parks program has plenty of green space in it, I will certainly vote for it and hope others do also. This is what we need, not more pavement.
Sally Turner
|
October 27, 2009
Great job committee members - I know it was hard work. You will hear many more complaints than thank you!

THANK YOU for your time!
Pat H
|
October 27, 2009
OK, since this parks idea was formulated we have had a major recession, huge job losses without any indication of recovery and massively decreased revenues. Put a sock in it, Cobb.

What you should be doing instead is buying out those poor homeowners and make their properties a park. Win-Win solution.
Typical Cobb
|
October 27, 2009
As usual, look at the map. NE Cobb gets whatever they want. Look at the number of proposed parks there compared to the number of proposed parks in the South Cobb area. Maybe it's time to get some commissioners that will stand up for South Cobb area and not just be a puppet for East Cobb.
Unglaublich
|
October 27, 2009
Good...real good. 8900 feet from the western border of the Bullard property. That's less than 2 miles folks. West Cobb must have some pretty powerful connections. 100 acres at horribly overpriced Bullard Farm...161 acres at Lost Mountain...153 acres across the street from the prime property at Boots Ward. My goodness...that's more than 410 acres all within less than 1.3 miles of each other. Oh...and don't forget Charles Kastner's 12 acre "Farm" (where so much County 'business' is done) being directly in between Bullard and the Lost Mountain property. I'm just not buying this as the "right" thing to do. This is the politically right thing to do, just like in Washington. Yuk !!
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.