If so-called Balanced Calendar is adopted, who will bear cost?
by Laura Armstrong
MDJ Columnist
October 21, 2009 02:45 PM | 1547 views | 23 23 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Does it strike anyone else as mighty suspicious that all of a sudden our esteemed school board is entertaining a revival of the so-called Balanced Calendar (first floated during the controversial Joe Redden reign of terror) when a majority four of the seven board members campaigned heavily on later school start dates?

Once upon a time, when a seat on the board was but a twinkle in his eye, current Chairman Dr. John Abraham (Post 4) was courted, supported and boosted by the pro-summer, later-start group Georgians Need Summers. I know this (full disclosure) because I was involved with them in 2004, before beginning to write for the MDJ.

Late last year, Abraham was quoted as saying he wants school to begin around Aug. 17, noting that with budget cuts it’s more economical to push school start dates towards cooler days. Yet he’s not being very vocal in leading us towards a later start.

Board members Abraham, the Rev. Dr. John Crooks (Post 6), Abraham, David Morgan (Post 3), Alison Bartlett (Post 7) and David Banks (Post 5) all campaigned with an emphasis on later school start dates. Morgan and Banks are both on record as preferring a post-Labor Day start (the way it was done when my girls were in elementary school); however, both Banks and Bartlett did a flip-flop in March, voting against pushing the start date from Aug. 10 to the 17.

Yet today, Oct. 19, Banks’ website was touting the later, post-Labor Day start. Earth to Mr. Banks . . . which is it?

Meanwhile, Lynda Crowder-Eagle (Post 1), who probably revealed less in her campaign than any elected official in history yet won anyway because of the R next to her name, has finally come out against summer fun in August (instead favoring 120 degree buses and higher air conditioning bills). She appears to be for a balanced calendar.

And Holli Cash (Post 2) . . . well, who really understands what she’s saying?

So where is this all going? What’s the next great manipulation from Glover Street? If the balanced calendar is magically adopted, who will bear the cost? Where will the extra funding come from in this economy? Hint: Saving money without eliminating instructional days, i.e. furloughing teachers during the balanced calendar’s multiple short breaks, is a reality this week in Griffin-Spalding County.

Comments
(23)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Melanie in Marietta
|
November 10, 2009
The comment about the "tutoring and day camps" offered to parents who do not "chose" to vacation on the weeks off in Sept. and Feb. is right on point! My kids will be with me on those weeks, but who is speaking up for the kids whose parents can't be with them? Will they be home alone or in ASP from 7:15 a.m.- 6 p.m. (is that what Mr. Banks means by "day care or tutoring")....sounds more expensive to taxpayers to me. BTW, what about the kids that normally get the free lunch for those two weeks (guess MUST ministries will need to step in and help then too, not just the Summer?)! This "shuffle" in school days doesn't improve test scores, parent involvement does!
all about utilities?
|
October 26, 2009
So you people who are only focused on the AC bills would rather THAT be the driving force in setting a school calendar? If it's all about utilities, maybe schools should be out all of January and August to maximize savings on both heating costs and air conditioning costs. Now there's a calendar! If it's too hot to go to school in August, what are kids safe doing.... just sitting inside the air conditioning at home or at the mall?
East Cobb Mom
|
October 26, 2009
First, if you research Cherokee's experience with the balanced calendar, they have had a SIGNIFICANT increase in student attendance rates since switching to the balanced calendar. Since federal funding is based on student attendance, more kids in school means more money for the District. Also, Cherokee has statistics to show that student achievement on standardized tests has been improved since switching to the balanced calendar. This could be from increased attendance, from more days of school before the testing dates, or perhaps with more breaks the students are more focused??? But more schools making AYP would be a great thing for Cobb. While some may worry about the additional costs from starting a little earlier in the summer - hopefully the increased funding from attendance rates can offset this. Any plan that can increase student performance should be seriously considered!
To Cobb Voter 2
|
October 25, 2009
In regards to your comments about the budget, ALT positions were eliminated from the budget and do not exist as such for the 2009-2010 school year. It was in the approved budget outline which appears on the CCSD website and I should know-I had that job for the past three years. Before you make comments that are factually incorrect, check your information. Finally, additional bus stops were added because of parental complaints.
S. Adams
|
October 24, 2009
If the so called balanced calendar is a cost cutter in any way, why isn't it introduced to parents that way? Joe Redden and his cronies (including Linda Eagle?) used to justify it with some bizarre thing about planting when we were a farming community and how things have changed now...duh...but not one official has ever made a rational, cohesive argument for moving completely away from the traditional calendar that we all went to school observing, and that was used in Cobb County until really just a few years ago, i.e. back when Cobb schools truly were the best in Georgia. We've been living on our laurels, parents and teachers. Officials need to accomodate so many types of students these days, but it's to the detriment of the majority of the students. And Glover Street seems to nurture a culture that has forgotten what it's about in the trenches. And teachers, I'm SO sorry you guys want MORE days off in the middle of your year, but what is that based on? That's just not reality in the professional world.
Sad Sad Teacher
|
October 23, 2009
According to the state, teachers cannot be furloughed on days when students attend. Therefore, other districts on balanced calendars have furloughed teachers on the week long break. I miss the days when Cobb set the tone for the state. Now, our administration and board are behind what other districts do. Other districts are shortening the calendar by increasing 10 min per day. Other districts are starting later to save utility costs. Please, Cobb , go back to being a leader in education in GA.
cobbmom15
|
October 23, 2009
Having lived in a "balanced calendar" school district before living here, and being a school teacher I would like to add my perspective to this "discussion". Teachers and students need the breaks. The students come back refreshed and ready to learn. When we go for long stretches, such as from Labor Day to Thanksgiving, and Christmas to Spring Break without days off they get tired and lose momentum, and discipline issues sharply rise. For the parents' benefit, wouldn't you rather vacation during the off season when things are cheaper and less crowded? Disney World in early October is much better than June or July.
Ford Elem Mom
|
October 23, 2009
Why does the school board insist school finish an entire week before Memorial Day? Most of the country finishes in mid-June, not mid-May?!?! I think Cobb needs to completely cut out early release days and switch to the hours in school not days. Wednesday, my target child had 2 hours cut from target class and then had to go watch a magician. Tell me how a magician pulling coins from ears is teaching our children. There is 0 learning going on during early release. If those days were cut (at least at the elem. and middle school level) you could cut a couple of days off the calendars and the kids would actually get instruction the days they are there. Right now, there are 7 early release days that my children might as well not even bother going to school those days because they won't learn a thing.
Rachel Tribble
|
October 22, 2009
To know it all

These calendars are based on 180 days - read the bottom. When they start going to hours on the calendar or decreasing the number of days on the calendar - then we can discuss that. Stay on point.

The balanced calendar will save heating costs! Save substitute costs because of less teacher absentees. Allow kids that are behind to catch up.

there are pluses too!

anonymous
|
October 22, 2009
come on ACE - the parents will. They are already doing that during the summer months trying to get kids to pass the CRCT.

some of these comments are irrational!

to board is a joke
|
October 22, 2009
I am curious about your email or conversation with Ms. Crowder Eagle. She seems to contradict herself (surprise Suprise), so did she say she will support balanced calendar or no? My guess is she didn't say.....these board members make me sick. This is a no brainer, in this economy there is no excuse not to save every dime possible and not put any more on the backs of our children. Don't worry they will pass year round school, then not bat an eye at increasing class size, furloughing the teachers, cutting their salaries even more. I don't know how they look themselves in the mirror, especially David Banks Liar Liar!!!!!!!!!!
heidi Toombs
|
October 22, 2009
Although I don't trust this board or administration 1 bit. Please tell me how this is going to cost the teachers?

If the teachers were going to be furloughed, they would be furloughed with or without the balanced calendar.

You are not making sense
anonymous
|
October 21, 2009
Mr. Abraham, when you directed Mr. Sanderson to return a calendar with a start date of August 15th, I wish you would have added, "and it must end the Friday before Memorial day, or another date after Memorial Day." The fourth calendar you requested is simply an effort to keep teachers from supporting the later start date, because it eliminates days from both Thanksgiving and winter breaks. This was a deliberate manipulation. If I were you, I would direct them back to the drawing board for a reasonable calendar with a later start date.
The board is a joke!
|
October 21, 2009
I emailed our incompetent rep. Crowder-Eagle who informed me, she has never found research that supports a balanced calendar improves academic scores. Why a balanced calendar? The county goes green all summer having the staff coming in at 7:00 am- 5:00pm Mon-Thurs. to save money. Ms.Crowder-Eagle told me, the district would not really save money if we had a later start date. REALLY-then why do you have the staff go green for the summer? Aside from saving money-August is the worst air quality month for children. Youhave them on non-air-conditioned buses! I am convinced the board and Sanderson love to make the opposite positions of the public because it makes them feel powerful. The county has polled the teachers but that means nothing. The board will just tell people the majority of teachers choose whatever the board wants. The lie every day of the week. In addition, teachers who work in the summer for 12 weeks will not be able to if there is a balanced calendar.
Samuel Adams
|
October 21, 2009
It's time to hold a few tea parties at the local level. Doesn't anyone have the integrity to hold true to their campaign promises any more? This balanced calendar or year round calendar or whatever the latest trendy name is, is an expansion of the cost of running our government, at a time when this is the last thing the board or the staff should be entertaining. Opening the schools up so much earlier will of course be more expensive. So why, when we should be compacting rather than expanding?
trixie P
|
October 21, 2009
I have read and studied the 4 calendars, although there is something in each that I dislike, they are not going to be able to please all the people all of the time.

I like the "balanced calendar" despite what you "East cobber more summer" say - and I am from East Cobb.

In case you need to know - i'm not a teacher but a mom of 5 in CCSD
guess I'm insane
|
October 21, 2009
cause I don't see how this is costing more money? As lucy wrote other than AC what other costs are involved?

BTW - the kids are not that hot - I grew up in Atlanta w/o AC in the school - my parents walked miles in snow drifts to school in New York

My kids will be able to tell their kids they rode to school in a non-AC bus in August.

WAAAAAAAAAAA -

cobb voter2
|
October 21, 2009
Lucy - have you checked the cost of a/c for all the schools during the hottest month of the year? The budget is short, they reinstated most of the bus stops so no savings there, ALT still in place, no savings there, and now lets add an increase in utilites. This isnt' the time to have that sort of change. Now is the time to be conservative.
to lucyw
|
October 21, 2009
Well lucy other than air conditioning costs. Do you realize how much energy it takes to cool down these aging buildings in the dead of August. If starting later saves a dime, then that is what should be done. What rock to you live under that you do not realize that more and more severe cuts are on the way for public education. Every dime counts. And by the way Lucy, news flash they do not have to go 180 days anymore, just have to have the hours.
Ace Cafe
|
October 21, 2009
According to an article published last week in the newspaper, Mr. Banks (apparently a balanced calendar supporter) said, "For those who choose not to vacation these weeks, there would be tutoring and day camp options for working parents." Who exactly is paying for the tutoring and day camp options? The taxpayers?? If so, how much will this cost us???
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.