School board to vote on Milford
by Jon Gillooly
jgillooly@mdjonline.com
September 23, 2009 01:00 AM | 1341 views | 12 12 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
MARIETTA - A majority of Cobb school board members intend to grant the county's Department of Transportation permission Thursday to run a new four-lane highway right by Milford Elementary on Austell Road.

"I think we've had enough time on this. Personally, I'm in favor of it," school board Chairman Dr. John Abraham said.

Although many members of the Milford community oppose the request, board members the Rev. Dr. John Crooks, David Banks and Lynnda Crowder-Eagle have also said they will approve it.

Residents have denounced the road as a safety hazard to the elementary students.

Called the Windy Hill/Macland Road Connector, the new thoroughfare is intended to provide west Cobb motorists a more direct route to Interstate 75 by connecting Macland Road at Powder Springs Road to Windy Hill Road at Austell Road. The two-mile highway, which would pass just 100 feet north of the school building, is scheduled to open May 2011.

Banks believes the road will help the community by relieving traffic congestion.

As to safety concerns, "We have other schools in similar situations. I don't see that as a major problem," he said.

Board member Alison Bartlett, who represents the school, is trying to convince the board to sell the Milford property and build a new school at another location.

"It's not a safe place anymore," she said.

The school already has a trash dump, police shooting range and jail behind it. A major highway slashing right by Milford would be in addition to the busy Austell Road in front of it.

The school board would never permit a school in the wealthy east Cobb community to be treated this way, Bartlett said, adding that students who attend Milford are mostly minorities from lower income families.

Bartlett said when she first began to protest the road proposal after stepping onto the board in January, she was warned that it would be the end of her political career.

"I was told to shut up and go away. (They said) 'Who cares about those people,'" Bartlett said, declining to reveal who made those comments to her.

But rather than go away, she continues to voice objections.

"Once again, this community gets the shaft. It angers me to no end," she said. "This population has been discriminated against by Cobb County. Cobb failed this whole area."

Bartlett estimates a new school would necessitate 15 to 20 acres, but says the board has millions available in its SPLOST II and III accounts earmarked for land acquisition that could pay for such property. What the school district doesn't have is the funding to build the school, which would cost in the neighborhood of $30 million, she said.

She hopes that $30 million can be secured with federal stimulus money.

"That's a pretty big hurdle," said Michael Andel, chief of staff for U.S. Congressman David Scott (D-Smyrna).

Andel said the federal government doesn't typically fund the construction of schools, leaving that to the local governments. Moreover, he said stimulus money is supposed to be spent within 12 to 16 months. And that means spent, not placed in a savings account, he said.

Andel said there are some zero interest bonds available to schools in the Recovery Act, but that would be something the school board would need to actively seek, in which case Scott's office could then help them.

In May, the board voted to grant access to Milford so the Cobb Department of Transportation could do preliminary utility work. The Thursday vote is the important vote, district spokesman Jay Dillon said.

"It would grant the easements needed for the project," he said.

Cobb Board of Commissioners Chairman Sam Olens has given the board a deadline of Sept. 30 to approve the easement.

"If the county is not able to get a decision on access to the school property by September 30, 2009, Cobb County will have no choice other than to redesign the road to avoid the school property. Unfortunately, this will also have the effect of eliminating the many improvements to Milford Elementary School," Olens wrote in an Aug. 28 letter to Abraham.

Olens was referring to the $1.2 million in improvements the county has agreed to make "to include land for a much larger playground, a safer parking lot and the shared cost of school guards." Additionally, Olens has offered to fund a $1 million lighted tunnel for students to use; however, the board rejected that offer for liability reasons.

The board meeting begins at 7 p.m. Thursday in the boardroom at 514 Glover Street in Marietta. Residents who wish to address the board should arrive to sign in at 6:30 p.m.
Comments
(12)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
It must be January..
|
September 24, 2009
Didn't the board recently vote to table a vote on Milford until January? Why now is it suddenly back on the table? I must have slept through Christmas. Board - do the right thing and make the best decision for the students who are your true constituents and don't let Big Bad Sam Olens threaten you!
Allegedly
|
September 24, 2009
To answer "Frankie58" All of the school board members have allegedly visited Milford ES and viewed the site. After viewing the site no one in their right mind would agree that over 650 students should endure such conditions. Simply put, all fo the school board members with the exception of Alison Bartlett desperately need a SANITY check! Then again, we may need to check Alison as well if she actually thought she was dealing with a reasonably sane bunch. BOE reps were elected to represent their Post and the overall well being of children and schools. They are failing miserably, yet the public has no way to hold them accountable...making calls, sending emails or attending the meeting and addressing them in public comment...is TOTALLY ineffective. It's business as usual "Dirty Insane Politicians rubbing elbows and making side deals at the Expense of our Children" You win on this side of the journey of life...I would love to be there to see what's in store for you on the other side!
Frankie58
|
September 24, 2009
Have any of these board members ever traveled Windy Hill between 7 and 8:30 am or 3:30-5:30 pm? It is virually a parking lot during these times. Also do they realize that once the new developement at the corner of Windy Hill and Atlanta Roads is completed that the proposed occupancy will be over 250 more apartments and townhomes? This is what we need on the West End of Windy Hill, FOUR more lanes of traffic traffic feeding into an already major problem. Oh, I forgot to mention you also have the students that drive from Campbell High School in this equation also!
OUTRAGED CITIZEN
|
September 24, 2009
Anonymous, what pedestrian pass are you taking about? There is No plan for a "pedestrian pass". There will be a crosswalk for the children walking to school to cross. What "safety" problem?. Well let me tell you. Let's not forget about Austell Road running in front of the school. This road has about 30,000 cars per day. Now, add the Windy/Macland expansion, you have 40 to 50,000 cars passing on the side of the school. Safety issue you ask?!? That is ~70 thousand cars passing this school a day. ELEMENTARY children mind you. And you ask about "SAFETY"!! No one is saying the children of East Cobb are not in harms way, but I will say this again, it makes no sense to KNOWINGLY put children in harms way if preventable.
Stand Up!
|
September 23, 2009
Give me a break... "Concerned Taxpayer" if the conditions are ok, let's bus your kids over to Milford ES and send the Milford kids to your school. Put on your bifocals and look at the plan again...they are building an expressway 55mph that will add over 100,000 cars daily. Give me a break...
Get the FACTS
|
September 23, 2009
I have reviewed the comments and I am not surprised! Before you comment get the FACTS! The similar schools cited by CCSD have very different conditions from Milford ES. The three or four lanes occur as the road widens at the traffic light. Most of the students attending those schools are car riders, unlike Milford ES where the primary means of transportation for most families is CCT. Please refrain from commenting if you have yet to visit the cite. Tell me what other schools in Cobb share the property line with a land fill, of which no one seems to accurately know what's been dumped there. Do your kids have the awesome benefit of inhaling the awful toxics? What other school in Cobb has a shooting range pratically in its backyard? Would you allow you children to endure listening to gun shots by Cobb County Police all day while trying to learn. Let's not mention our most recent addition the new jail. The Milford community functions as an urban community within the suburbs. The learning environment has been destroyed by Cobb County Commission and NO children should have to deal with these unacceptable conditions. Safety is our primary concern! But let's face it, the FACT is the conditions of the Milford ES learning environment would NOT be tolerated in East Cobb or any other part of Cobb that's more affluent. The truth is we should view all children as our very own and give them a chance regardless of their economic class. Instead our silence on this issue speaks volumes. White, Yellow, Brown or Black, NO child deserves to be thrown away ALL children deserve a safe learning environment and a opportunity to excel. Now that's the FACTS!
anonymous
|
September 23, 2009
I'm not sure exactly what this "safety" problem is. My understanding is that the school itself will be set back at least 100 feet from the road so students arriving in vehicles should not be impacted. The county has agreed to install a pedestrian pass through for students walking to school. Bringing up race and class definitely makes good PR but I can name at least 3 schools in East Cobb that have similar placements and I haven't heard any "safety" issues arising there. IMO, building a new school here is a waste of taxpayer money; we have other elementary schools like Clarksdale that are far more deserving of a new school.
concerned taxpayer
|
September 23, 2009
How exactly is getting a new buffer zone and a new playground putting these kids in harms way? I think it is just a few over zealous moms who are trying to get a new school any way they can. You can tell by the capitalization of the outraged citizen below - there are no facts, just emotion.

I don't see the problem, and I have seen the plans. I'm with the board on this one - we don't have the $$ for a new school and this is not about safety - that is a great buzz word to get the PR though.
enough
|
September 23, 2009
Alison you have done a great job raising the PR on this one but based on you comments - you are a bigot - to say that this wouldn't happen in East Cobb is downright wrong. When was that last time you were in some of the schools in East Cobb? I have to send my son to school with an extra set of clothes on rainy days, because he gets so wet running to the trailers for lunch, PE, art or just going to the library and then he freezes while sitting in the class. Last year we had rats that would leave dropping throughout the class room. We have sinks that drip all day, yet cannot be turned on to wash hands, in one girls restroom we have one toilet that works. We have 5 lanes of traffic whizzing by the playground and the only buffer is leland cypress trees. The only reason our PE building has AC is because of a capital campaign paid for by parents same with playground equipment. The parents have again footed the bill - not the taxpayers.

The grass is always greener on the other side of the county. But east cobb school buildings are not the crowning glory that I think you want to aspire to be like.

Casting stones and creating jealousy is not the way to get sympathy from other parents. you got it made compared to us. My vote is NO!
resident since 94'
|
September 23, 2009
This is ridiculous. The east west connector was suppose to take traffic away from windy hill road now it will be brought back. There is already enough dangerous traffic at that intersection. The board would not put a major road way through all elementary school property, why are they allowing this on ?
OUTRAGED CITIZEN
|
September 23, 2009
This is a sad day when CCSD BOE is more concerned with easing traffic flow than the SAFETY and welfare of our children. Mr. Banks quoted "As to safety concerns, "We have other schools in similar situations. I don't see that as a major problem,"." WOW!!! Because other children are put in harms way, is he saying that it is O.K. to knowingly put children in HARMS WAY?!?!? UNBELIEVABLE!! The people of the Milford Elem. community call on ALL of COBB's citizens to come to the school board meeting on Thursday, Sept. 24 @ 6:30p.m. to voice their OUTRAGE over allowing this road to go through without moving the school. THE BOE's CONCERN SHOULD BE THE SAFETY OF ALL OF COBB's CHILDREN!!!!
Mad-one
|
September 23, 2009
Give Alison Bartlett credit for doing what is best for her CONSTITUENTS. She may fail, but she has given the residents of this area a voice. I don't see how that can be a bad thing politically. As for execution, she is a bit of a dreamer; she also thought she could stop the East-West connector as it passed by her neighborhood. I wouldn't be surprised if the DOT offices had a dart board with her picture on it. Give 'em hell Allison.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.