'99% positive we'll appeal,' says Godwin
by Jon Gillooly
jgillooly@mdjonline.com
September 17, 2009 01:09 AM | 1348 views | 6 6 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Pearlberg/Godwin respond to decision
Pearlberg/Godwin respond to decision
MARIETTA - Developer Wes Godwin said he will likely appeal within the next 10 days a decision from the Cobb Board of Elections, which denied his request to disqualify Councilman Van Pearlberg from seeking re-election Nov. 3.

The elections board turned down the request Wednesday. The appeal would go to Cobb Superior Court.

Godwin is challenging Pearlberg for the City Council's Ward 4 seat. He maintains that Pearlberg has a conflict of interest by serving as both a councilman and a senior assistant district attorney.

Godwin spoke of the difficult decision the Board of Elections had to make when they denied his request Wednesday.

"This is an area that most boards have never dealt with before, I'm sure," Godwin said, adding, "I'm 99 percent positive we'll appeal. I'm going to speak with my attorney tomorrow."

Godwin said he was prompted to file the complaint against Pearlberg by supporters.

"People in Ward 4 have been requesting me to run for all these months, and once I decided to do so they came to me again and voiced this concern of the double-dipping, the fox guarding the hen house, the serving two masters, which is all true according to the attorney general's writings," Godwin said. "The attorney general being the top law enforcement official in the state of Georgia, I would think his word would have some credence. But evidently the opposing side chooses to pick and choose to which law or opinion they want to abide by. Just by virtue of the testimony today," he said.

Godwin was referring to how Pearlberg's attorney, Tom Cauthorn, cast doubt on the unofficial attorney general's opinions that Godwin used in the hearing. But at the same time, Pearlberg and the rest of the City Council has made a request for the attorney general to issue an opinion on the legality of a proposal to restructure the bond debt on the Marietta Conference Center.

"Van asked for the attorney general's opinion through the City Council, but yet he doesn't want to abide by the attorney general's opinion when it relates to him. Again, my constituents in my ward asked me to investigate this, which is what led me to this today," Godwin said.

Commenting after the meeting, Pearlberg expressed relief at the board's decision and vowed to continue to fight should Godwin appeal.

"Absolutely. I'm not going to give up at all," Pearlberg said.

Responding to Godwin's accusations that a conflict of interest could exist, Pearlberg said, "I am proud of my service as an assistant district attorney and proud of my service as councilman for Ward 4 and look forward to serving the public in both capacities. There have been no conflicts thus far and I perceive of none in the future. I deal with real facts and real evidence, not imaginary speculation or what may possibly, somehow, maybe, potentially come about."
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Mad-one
|
September 18, 2009
Oops Wes,

That statement should have been "99% positive I will appeal. So, exactly of whom are you referring when you say "We'll appeal"? Is it your puppetmaster Goldstein?
Vote For Pedro
|
September 18, 2009
Godwin might appeal til the cows come home, but he will never be appealing
Ward 4 for Godwin
|
September 17, 2009
oh Pearl and your supporters, don't be another Hillary! Step out now. Do right by the Attorney General office.

Congratulations Wes!
To John N.H.
|
September 17, 2009
I doubt if Godwin is wasting his money. It's either Goldstein's money or our TAD money. Godwin would never waste a dime of his own money to do anything for the benefit of Marietta. Not that his candidacy would have any benefit to Marietta; I'm just sayin'...
Ward 4
|
September 17, 2009
I'm guessing "constituents" means Mrs. Godwin. She probably wants to get him out of the house!
John N.H.
|
September 17, 2009
This is a total crock and sham by Godwin. What a snake. Yo, Wes...they are not your constituents yet. One must be elected first before those in your district become your constituents. Oh...I forgot...in your mind you are already elected. Go ahead and appeal...waste your money...look like Goldstein's fool. Your case is thinner than water. And as for all the folks wanting a choice as opposed to you only on the ballot...well Wes -- given the choice of you and no one else, they don't want you. Given the choice of Van and no one else, they'll take Van. Get it yet? The whole country is screaming for integrity, transparancy, accountibility, and true representative ability...and you come to the surface??? There's a non sequitur.
*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.