Look beyond the myths on health-care reform
September 16, 2009 01:00 AM | 556 views | 8 8 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DEAR EDITOR:

As the debate over national health care reform has grown increasingly heated, it's become more and more difficult to separate fact from fiction based on newspaper accounts alone, despite journalists' best efforts. In that spirit, here are a few points people should know the truth about before reform comes up for final votes in Congress.

When you or a loved one is incapacitated near the end of life and unable to make decisions, would you like to have your family involved in making the relevant decisions about your care or making sure your wishes are carried out? Some versions of health care reform bills encourage doctors to offer counseling to help you prepare for this type of situation. If you support that, you should support health care reform - and you should definitely ignore disingenuous or misinformed opponents of reform who try to scare you with bogus stories about so-called "death panels."

Next time you're choosing an insurance plan, would you like to be restricted to private plans that may or may not keep your best interests above their profit interests? Or would you rather add in the option of a public health insurance plan with a government mandate to cut your costs? With a public option, you can't lose - you can have that public plan, or you can have your same choice of private plans, only now they re competing with the public plan. The choice would be yours.

Some versions of health care reform contain language about eligibility for health care that is similar to language found in George W. Bush s Medicare Part D bill from 2003. As any reasonable person would expect, this language restricts eligibility to U.S. citizens and those living in America legally. Yet many of the very same Republicans who voted for Bush s Medicare bill now oppose Obama s health care reform because they wrongly claim it would give benefits to people who are in America without proper legal paperwork. These claims don't add up, and they deserve to be ignored.

A number of the misconceptions out there about health care reform can be traced to the powerful lobbying and misinformation campaigns of the very industry with the most to lose when the system gets fixed - the private insurance companies who are taking advantage of current holes in regulations. If it sounds too bad to be true, it probably isn't true.

Polls show that most people who find out the truth about these myths support health care reform, and I'm confident the readers of your newspaper will be no different. Please make sure everyone knows the truth.

Dr. C.M. Hair
Kennesaw
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Kim Hufman
|
September 17, 2009
No Pain:

Since we have both identified each other's source of talking points, (me: Kos and Huffington ), you:

Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh, I think we have identified the problem..we are both to polar in opinions and ideas. I am for cost containment, but how does that happen under the current mode?..how do small business stay in business when healthcare costs are doubling for employees every few years?, and thats under the free market system. A public option would provide competition where there is none...and yes, let insurance companies compete across state lines, and how about tort reform, capping malpractice suits so obgyn's don't have to shutter their doors for fear of lawyers and practice ending lawsuits?

There's a lot to be done for the good, because it ain't working the way it is..maybe we can all stop the divisive nature of the discussion and work towards a set of solutions/

one who knows
|
September 17, 2009
As a person who doesn't work for but with insurance companies, I can say without a doubt the regulations each state government puts on the companies costs a ton of money to do business. If most companies were regulated this way, we would have no industry at all. I know what the government - state and federal - has done to increase this healthcare problem and blaming it all on companies while saying the government isn't part of the problem is a crock. Let insurance companies do business across state lines, take medical insurance out of the business and make it like car insurance. I don't mind helping those "uninsurables" get insured, but more government is NOT THE ANSWER KIM.
Vote For Pedro
|
September 16, 2009
Three words... SHOW ME WHERE

When the Palin Good Squad insists there is something in the bill, tell them SHOW ME WHERE.

Pull up the bill from the Congress website, not some nutty right winger website. Then have them SHOW ME WHERE.

Accusations without citations are baseless!

You think something EVIL is in the bill?

SHOW ME WHERE
No Payne
|
September 16, 2009
Your drivel becomes so tiring, Kim. What a shame you didn't put in a slam at Bush / Cheney in your comment. Talking points? You are the definition of that -- offering nothing but Huff Post and Daily Kos / Move on.org points. Detailing my 4 points of disagreement would take pages, particularly to your ilk that doesn't understand supply/demand, hasn't read the bill, and actually believes government will do better at managing health care than us. 30% less per capita, Kim? Yes...with higher unemployment, radically higher taxes (not necessarily allocated to health care), and dramatic delays in delivery of care due to rationing. Add Canada, Australia, the UK, and Germany to your list. Don't forget the NICE Board in the UK. The source of your $$$ on health care in the US ?? A talking point? How about adding "loser pays" to med/mal lawsuits like all of your cited countries have. How about getting rid of stateline restrictions on health insurance to increase the size of insured pools? How about giving tax breaks to individuals like businesses get for having health insurance? Have you considered these huge cost saving measures, Kim, or are you just in lock step with all those that see a govenment takeover (along with that juicy thing for you liberals - soaking the so-called rich) as the only and right way to run health care? I susupect it is the latter -- based on nothing but talking points supplied to you.
Kim Huffman
|
September 16, 2009
No Paine: You provide no insight or value with your criticism of Dr. Hair's point of view, only static.

You list 4 points, but offer no proof just conservative based talking points gleaned from the last Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh tirade.

Did you know the average American ( and his employer ) pay 13 thousand a year for health care coverage?, and that is predicted to rise to over 24 thousand within a decade?..who is paying for that?..no wonder jobs are moving overseas, and wages are static. The current crisis is strangling employers.

The record in other health care nationalized programs?, look at Japan, Norway, Sweden..all citizens are provided with great healthcare, with the total healthcare cost to the economy about 30 percent less per capita.

Mike Johnson
|
September 16, 2009
I wonder if Dr. Hair has bothered to read HR3200? There are excellent summaries just a google search away. By the way, a google search for "Dr. C.M. Hair" returns no results. Hmmmm.
No Payne
|
September 16, 2009
Nice try, Dr. Hair. You, too, have been totally deceived and have no understanding whatsoever of 1) economics in general, 2)the actual goal of this administration's insurance company/hospital grab, 3) the record of nationalized healthcare in other countries, and 4) what the language of HR 3200 (and other iterations) actually says. Your letter is just as misleading and misguided as all the totally biased press reports out there. Read the bill for yourself, folks. Then you decide. I have. And now well more than 65% of the country agrees with me, not with Dr. Hair (a DC, I'm guessing), that Obamacare is a disaster in the making. Hands off MY health and healthcare Mr. Obama and Congress.
Kim Huffman
|
September 16, 2009
Thank you Dr. Hair for bringing the truth forward from the static.

*All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will be rejected.