Gingrey says 'no' to health reform
by Talia Mollett
tmollett@mdjonline.com
September 01, 2009 01:00 AM | 434 views | 8 8 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Congressman Phil Gingrey answers questions during his town hall meeting.
view slideshow (2 images)
MARIETTA - The recent death of Sen. Ted Kennedy won't give an added push in Washington to a health care reform bill, U.S. Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Marietta) said Monday night at the Cobb Civic Center. It was the congressman's second town hall meeting in Cobb in less than a week.

"I don't really believe it will have a big effect. There's been a lot of talk over the weekend about it. (Kennedy's) vision over the years in the Senate was to lead the liberal cause. He was pretty much unabashedly the liberal lion of the Senate in health care reform in the way President Obama has proposed it," he said. "While there may be some who will say this will be the push that will get us over the finish line, I don't think so. I think people will still feel very firmly about either their support or opposition to this reform."

Gingrey said he's been busy over the summer hosting town hall meetings and listening to constituents. He said he's received thousands of letters and phone calls on health care reform.

"The main thing I've learned from my constituents is that they don't like it. We've done a number of town hall meetings in August and the turnout has been double what would be at a normal town hall meeting. This is a subject that is really close to people's heart," he said. "What we're seeing is a lot of seniors at the meetings. They realize the Medicare program is going to be cut pretty drastically to pay for this health care reform. People are speaking out loud and clear and want me and Congress to know and understand their concern."

A repeated question at both of Gingrey's town hall meetings has been whether the public actually has any power in the decision of the health care reform.

"I think they have a lot and they're beginning to realize that they do. A lot of times people are frustrated and say that as an individual, small group, or small area of the country that they don't really have a lot of influence," he said. "That may be true, but when they all show up all with the same voice, the media will cover it. So I think people are really encouraged now that maybe their voice means something. That's a real positive thing."

Indeed, Monday night's town hall meeting was filled with hundreds of people who had a unified voice - one that was saying "no" to Democrat-backed health care reform.

One constituent begged Gingrey to fight against reform when he returned to Capitol Hill, and if all else failed, to abstain from voting.

"If they push to this and you're going to lose 240 to 190, don't vote. Make them pay for it. Stick an elbow in their ribs. In other words, bold dramatic action. I don't believe this is over. Fight!" he said, before the crowd rose to their feet.

Questions ranged on the same variety of topics that were presented in prior town hall meetings: Medicare, veteran's health care, tort reform and the nuclear option. Gingrey addressed the heightened discussion surrounding the nuclear option, a process by the majority of the Senate to end the attempted removal of a bill (filibuster) by majority vote, as opposed to 60 senators voting to end a filibuster.

"That is taking away the rights of the minority through policy and procedure, kind of like wheeling and dealing, and doing things that the Constitution never intended the majority to do to force something through without needing 60 votes, without the threat of filibuster," Gingrey said. "I hope and pray the majority party will not do that because I think they will do it at their own peril. It would be terrible for the country."

While the majority of attendees were against Democratic proposals on reform, a few concerned citizens showed up at Gingrey's town hall meeting to ask the congressman how he would help them without health care reform. Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-east Cobb) was also presented Monday with about 100 signed postcards from Atlantans Building Leadership for Empowerment (ABLE) members who want to persuade Isakson that health care for all is a moral imperative.
comments (8)
« Barbara Lane wrote on Wednesday, Sep 02 at 05:32 PM »
Wow. I think it's completely fair to have a debate on the merits of a more nationalised healthcare system, Kay Parks. But don't call me or my state backward and naive simply because I don't agree with your opinion on how reforms should take place. Not a single politician that I know of has said "no" to healthcare reform. Rather many have said "no" to the current version of healthcare reform. And btw, if RN is concerned about how the misguided expansion of healthcare for seniors through prescription drug benefits was unfunded (something about which I agree), then he/she should consider how the current plan on the table might be unfunded as well... and that's a problem. In it's current form, Progressive Peach, I've heard Obamacare (as currently proposed) will add about 2 trillion to the deficit over ten years. Well, okay. Let's see. There are 300 million people in the US. Let's take 2 trillion and divide that amongst us all. Ummm.... That's more than a grand after five years owed per family. Basic math, sweetie. Can't we have a more rational discussion about the real issues that exist in our medical system? Or should people in Georgia just bow down to some smarter, wiser, non-Redneck folk who are clearly less naive than the citizens who didn't vote like they did because... well... (Stamping of Foot!) they said so. The Republicans have a good idea. Start the discussion again from scratch. Invite both parties to the table this time. Speak WITH each other rather than AT people in yet another speech. Heck. We can all have a beer afterwards.
« Kay Parks wrote on Wednesday, Sep 02 at 10:51 AM »
I can hardly believe how backward and naive Georgia is. Thank God I am only visiting this poor redneck area and have a Representative in my area that clearly cares about all of his constituents, not just the ones that are being paid off by the health insurance companies.
« So obvious wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 03:55 PM »
We do have an out of balance health care system - too many in need of health care and too few doctors and nurses ! The state of Georgia should double, and then double again, the number of "seats" in their medical, deatal, and nursing schools with the provision that the graduates practice in Georgia for Georgains ! Supply and demand balancing is the only long term solution ! How about that Dr. Gingrey ? Do the numbers !
« RN wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 02:35 PM »
Mr Gingrey and his team can only offer NO. Eight years of Bush has shown us that the Republicans are not interested in Healthcare reform. The only bill passed was written by Big Pharma and was unfunded adding to the deficit (Medicare Prescription ).

Mr Gingrey or should we call him Dr Gingrey has decided the health of Insurance companies are more important than the health of his constituents.

Mr Gingrey should show some courage and demand and fight for the end of Medicare a Govt run health plan. Isn't that what he fears if there is healthcare reform?

Mr Gingrey wants it both ways take as much as he can from the insurance lobby, complain and cry about Govt run health care but do nothing about Medicare. Courage No, Doctor No, pandering, fear mongering Politician, you bet.
« ProgressivePeach wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 11:04 AM »
The CBO reports that without a public option to hold down the insurance companies, we're going to see our healthcare premiums rise by $1,100 a person within 5 years. So essentially Gingrey is sentencing us to a thousand-dollar tax increase. Time to vote him out of office next November.
« Minorityreporter wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 08:26 AM »
God forbid we have an up or down vote on this. Gingrey is saying that a majority vote would be terrible for this country. He's opposing majority rule using a process that was used to pass medicare as well as many bills while republicans were in the majority with a lie. What he means is, terrible for his pockets and his twisted values. Calling an up or down vote "the nuclear option" is wrong, misleading and ignorant.

"n U.S. politics, the "nuclear option" is an attempt by a majority of the United States Senate to end a filibuster by majority vote, as opposed to 60 senators voting to end a filibuster. Although it is not provided for in the formal rules of the Senate, the procedure is the subject of a 1957 parliamentary opinion and has been used on several occasions since. The term was coined by Senator Trent Lott (Republican of Mississippi) in 2005.[1]

The maneuver was brought to prominence in 2005 when then-Majority Leader Bill Frist (Republican of Tennessee) threatened its use to end Democratic-led filibusters of judicial nominees submitted by President George W. Bush. In response to this threat, Democrats threatened to shut down the Senate and prevent consideration of all routine and legislative Senate business. The ultimate confrontation was prevented by the Gang of 14, a group of seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, all of whom agreed to oppose the nuclear option and oppose filibusters of judicial nominees, except in extraordinary circumstances." - wikipedia
« Same old stuff... wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 07:12 AM »
It took him a LONG time to finally come out and say it was against it. I don't understand. Our representatives just don't get it until the pressure cooker is turned up.
« J Balfour wrote on Tuesday, Sep 01 at 05:09 AM »
The top sectors contributing to Gingrey are the health industry, the finance and insurance industry, business interests and lawyers and lobbyists. Check it out on the internet sites that report all contributions to each representative or senator and you'll see who is really running this country.