Local Red Hare brewery to expand to Roswell Street: City Council sells property across from the Big Chicken
by Hilary Butschek
August 15, 2014 04:00 AM | 9551 views | 3 3 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
download Red Hare brewery renderings

MARIETTA — The City Council sold property it owns on Roswell Street across from the Big Chicken to the Red Hare Brewing Company.

The council also voted to limit the amount of time buildings can sit boarded up and approved spending tourism funds to appraise properties it’s eyeing for a new tourism center.

In a 7-0 vote, the council approved selling the 1.5 acre property for $465,000.

Red Hare Brewing Company has another location in Marietta on Delk Industrial Boulevard.

Mayor Steve Tumlin said the new location will be a good addition to the community.

“We live in an era where local craft beer is very popular, so having that at one of our main streets that hasn’t had anything for years — we’re very excited about it,” Tumlin said.

Tumlin added he enjoyed having the opportunity to support a local business.

“Red Hare has kind of come out of nowhere. It has just grown in popularity,” Tumlin said. “When you see the can (with the city’s name), it gives us a lot of pride in Marietta.”

City Manager Bill Bruton said the situation worked out well because Red Hare was looking to expand its business and the city was looking to sell a property on 994 Roswell Street it had purchased when it began widening the road.

Red Hare plans to construct a new 25,000 square foot building on the property that will include a brewery and tasting room, according to the purchase agreement approved by the council.

Limiting lifetime of boarded up buildings

The City Council voted 4-3, with Philip Goldstein, Anthony Coleman and Johnny Walker opposed, to approve a new portion of the city’s code limiting the amount of time a building can sit vacant and boarded up.

Buildings could remain boarded up for an unlimited amount of time before, but now, under the proposed portion of the code, there is a limit of up to six months.

After six months of sitting boarded up, city staff will ask the owner to bring the building up to code. If the owner does not want to comply, they can appeal to the City Council, said Brian Binzer, the city’s development services director.

If the owner wishes to appeal the City Council’s orders to comply with the code, he or she can take the issue before a judge, Binzer said.

The judge will decide if the building should be demolished or brought up to code.

“We’re not tearing down someone’s house. That is up to a judge,” said Councilman Stuart Fleming, who spearheaded the change.

Binzer said owners of boarded up buildings will have six months after the code goes into effect, which is expected this week, to register their buildings with the city.

Discussion of the proposal among council members was varied.

Tumlin argued against the ordinance at first because he said it did not allow due process to properties owners.

But, during the meeting, the council agreed to add language that puts the decision of demolishing a building up to a judge, and not to a member of the city government.

“There’s no chance for the government to get overzealous now,” Tumlin said.

Goldstein said he didn’t think all boarded up buildings should be eventually demolished.

“We’re going to knock it down, and you’re left with a slab there,” Goldstein said.

He added the value of a standing building could be higher than that of a vacant lot.

Walker said the new portion of the ordinance needed more work.

“I think there’s ways we can make our code enforcement stronger by making the fines higher and higher,” Walker said.

Coleman said the new code won’t solve the problem.

“You can put in all the ordinances you want, but you’re going to have to get in there and roll up your sleeves and take a proactive approach,” Coleman said.

Appraisals approved

The City Council also approved spending money to appraise property it is eyeing for a new tourism center, but which properties it is looking at were not specified.

Council voted 6-0 vote, with Goldstein abstaining, to use $2,500 from the tourism fund to appraise a few properties. Tumlin suggested Goldstein’s property at 77 North Park Square, which is an empty lot, could be one property the city appraises.

Goldstein would not specify his reason for abstaining from the vote.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
Dave Z
August 15, 2014
It's a big win to have Red Hare at the gateway to the city. But more forethought should've been put into the recent Roswell Street & Key/Coggins intersection construction. It now needs a left turn lane onto Coggins Place.

When 5th/3rd Bank announced plans for 41, I said then that the Roswell & Key intersection would need signalization. The bank changed course, but that intersection should have been designed to handle more traffic if the city wishes to redevelop the Key Drive area.
Dave Z
August 22, 2014
Perhaps a roundabout?
Definition of Irony
August 15, 2014
From Goldstein, the current (but hopefully not future) owner of the most prominent vacant lot in the city, "the value of a standing building could be higher than that of a vacant lot".

This just makes my head hurt. Your constituents must be very proud but more than likely are just very ignorant.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides