Byrne, Weatherford speak out on Cobb’s 1993 anti-gay resolution
by Ricky Leroux
July 21, 2014 04:00 AM | 3106 views | 11 11 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
ATLANTA — Bill Byrne should have found a way to avoid an “anti-gay” resolution the county passed during his time as chairman, Bob Weatherford believes.

Weatherford and Byrne, who are challenging each other in Tuesday’s runoff for a chance to replace retiring Commissioner Helen Goreham, tackled the infamous resolution at a debate hosted by the Atlanta Press Club and aired by Georgia Public Broadcasting on Sunday.

The two Republicans sounded off on the county’s bus rapid transit proposal, the Atlanta Braves and a possible new homestead option sales tax. But it was their comments on Cobb County’s 1993 “anti-gay” resolution that offered fresh insights into the candidates.

County Chairman Tim Lee gave his recollection of the resolution and how it came to pass in a 2012 Marietta Daily Journal article.

“It was basically in response to a play (‘Lips Together, Teeth Apart’) that was on at Theatre in the Square where there was an open display of a relationship between two gentlemen,” Lee said in 2012. “And (the commissioners) were offended by it, so they passed a resolution condemning that lifestyle. Call it, if you would, ‘family values.’ The Olympics pulled volleyball out of Cobb County — and all that economic impact and all the positive things that could have been happening to tourism — pulled that out of Cobb and made Cobb the laughingstock of the world.”

Byrne was the chairman of the Cobb Board of Commissioners when the resolution passed, and he expressed remorse for being a part of it.

“Well, I regret that that happened, yes,” Byrne said. “That was brought forward … by a district commissioner by the name of Gordon Wysong. He brought it forward with the majority of the Board of Commissioners supporting that. I could not — as much as I tried — (keep) it off of the agenda. When that came forward, it passed the Board of Commissioners. It was a resolution, not a policy statement.”

Still, Byrne voted for the resolution. He told the MDJ two years ago, the alternative was expressing support for the gay rights agenda.

“When given that as the question, then the answer to me is pretty clear. On that basis, I voted for the resolution,” he said in 2012.

The Olympic committee did remove the volleyball venue from Cobb, but Byrne said during his debate with Weatherford that the economic impact of the Olympics was still positive in the county.

“It did not remove all of the folks who came and spent nights and participated in Cobb County facilities, left their money there and enjoyed the Olympics from Cobb County,” he said.

When asked whether he would vote for the resolution today, Byrne said he would not, saying it was a “nasty point in time” for those involved and citing the resulting strained relationship with his openly gay daughter.

“It was something that was hurtful personally. It hurt my family, and it has followed me for years; to the point that two of you are asking me questions about it for something that happened 22 years ago,” he told a panel of journalists who asked the candidates questions during the debate. “No, I would not support something of that nature today.”

Weatherford had a similar response when he was asked the same question.

“I would never support something like that. I believe that everyone has equal opportunities,” Weatherford said. “I know there are certain rights that everyone’s granted.”

Weatherford also made sure to point out the resolution passed under Byrne’s watch.

“It was under chairman Byrne’s leadership that this occurred,” Weatherford said. “An effective leader, I think, would have somehow or another found a way not to have that harm Cobb County, which in fact it did.”

Braves deal, HOST tax and Cobb’s new lobbyist

Among other issues discussed during the debate was the commission’s handling of the deal to bring the Atlanta Braves to Cobb County.

Weatherford said the Board of Commissioners handled the situation well, but should have been more open about the process.

“And the only thing that I would have done different was try to offer some different transparency, if possible, to make sure everyone that was informed in the appropriate manner,” Weatherford said.

The former Acworth alderman went on to say if elected, he would ensure the county funds in the deal would be used as directed.

“My job as county commissioner (would be) to make sure that taxpayers’ interests are protected and that we spend what we say we’re going to spend,” he said.

Byrne was more critical of the Board of Commissioners, saying the chairman should have involved the district commissioners more and negotiated with the Braves to help fund public safety facilities in exchange.

“He should have negotiated with the Atlanta Braves and said to them, ‘I want ten acres for public safety use if you want to come to Cobb. I want the $5.5 million necessary to build a precinct if you want to come to Cobb. I want the $3.5 million necessary to build a fire station in Cobb.’ That’s a win-win,” Byrne said.

When the subject of a HOST tax was brought up, Weatherford and Byrne took opposing viewpoints.

Weatherford is in favor of the tax, saying it would decrease the burden on homeowners.

“It’s a way to increase revenue from all that participate in Cobb, that come through Cobb, that stay in Cobb to reduce the burden on the homeowners of Cobb County,” he said. “On the surface — I have not seen all the financial plans — on the surface it appears to be a good, possible alternative to lower property taxes while increasing the revenue of the general fund, thus allowing us to do certain things, such as public safety.”

Byrne disagreed.

“I’m very much opposed to it. People say that this is a tax on business. It’s not true; it’s a tax on consumers. It taxes everything you buy and need,” Byrne said. “The biggest folks who pay the most on this are those who have the least. It’s just another approach to get back into your wallet, and that’s the mentality of this Board of Commissioners.”

The Republican candidates also had diverging positions on the Board of Commissioners’ recent decision to award a $168,000 annual contract to Marietta-based Garrett McNatt Hennessey & Carpenter 360 to lobby for the county at the state and federal level.

Weatherford said he would have approved the contract if he were on the board, but only because the firm lobbies at the federal level.

“Cobb County is a member of the ACCG, which is the Association of County Commissioners of Georgia. And they provide lobbying efforts at the state level. If this particular lobbying agreement had only included the state level, I would have been opposed to it. … And I would have approved it for that reason, as long as there’s a return on investment that exceeds what we pay in,” he said.

Byrne rejected this line of reasoning, saying Georgia’s elected officials at the local, state and federal levels should be the ones lobbying on behalf of the county.

“What in the world do we need a lobbyist at six figures?” Byrne said. “The commission chairman, the county manager and whatever department heads are necessary can coordinate all of our needs through local delegations for local needs. We have state representation with our Senate and with our representatives for state needs. At the national level, to argue this is the justification for it, last time I looked, that’s why we elected congressmen.”

Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Changed Minds
|
July 21, 2014
Well, as you know, Bob Barr wrote the Defense of Marriage Act and now everyone is patting him on the back. Hmmmmmmmmm..........
Just Wait
|
July 21, 2014
I just can't wait until 7pm Tuesday!
Maccabee
|
July 21, 2014
For the basis of my comment, I wish to include the background of the path by which I arrived at my opinions.

Although I was raised in the church, I have had an open mind on moral and political issues, and a years long discussion with a friend of mine, who works in the aerospace industry. Somewhere between agnostic and atheist, my friend's tone, and the topics of our discussion, began to change when his work required him to begin studying quantum physics. My friend changed his mind, namely, that the universe shows evidence of intricate and intentional design, and that therefore there must be some ultimate Sentience that designed it, whom for the sake of discussion we decided to call the conventional God.

For my own part, I have studied many world religions and find Christianity to be the most logical and the most humane, and the Bible to be the most reliable text.

Based on my understanding of the Bible, and my own background in the medical field, I believe homosexual acts (not the homosexuals themselves ) to be destructive, relatively high risk, and immoral. Then again, so is illicit heterosexual sex outside of marriage.

Grow a spine.

Stand up for what you believe.

Don't let yourself be bullied by those who would use political correctness as a club.
Yada Yada......
|
July 21, 2014
I applaud your whole-hearted acceptance of your beliefs, and the rationale by which you came to those conclusions. If you could please tell me what time the public stoning of adulterers takes place on the square, and how much your bondsman might be worth, we will be able to continue this conversation.
RE:Maccabee
|
July 21, 2014
It isn't political correctness to be a bigot. Big deal about your friend, you grow a spine and stop your hate. Or as I suspect you are jealous of those who have may have a better sex life than you.
Lie of year
|
July 21, 2014
Byrne should win Cobb County Lie of the year claiming he was just a bystander in the anti gay vote. In fact he was all in on it and he and his companion Gordon Wysong spend weeks justifying his ignorance and hate. You can't rewrite history Mr. Byrne, don't lie about it.
Ben Twomey
|
July 21, 2014
How totally classless of Weatherford to bring up this 20 plus year old blunder.
An Observation
|
July 21, 2014
Many people would have thought differently on the '93 issue had it been put forth in 2014. I suspect had Byrne voted differently then, the citizens of Cobb, led by all the most influential clergy in the County would have come after him like a steam roller. The fact is simple, regardless of what you think of either of the candidates, that was then and this is now and it is comparing apples to oranges. It is interesting to note that neither candidate was asked how they felt about the eventuality of gay marriage. It would have also been interesting to note which rights Mr. Weatherford would indeed support.

so full of it
|
July 21, 2014
The crook of the '93 gay matter for this election is that Mr Byrne says he currently would not support an anti-gay resolution: “No, I would not support something of that nature today.”

The thing with Byrne, though, is he says he "tried [to] (keep) it off of the agenda" back then because he is claiming he didn't realy support it then either and it's really actually honestly Wysong's fault and it was like that when I got here.

Byrne's story seems to be that he was just playing along when he voted for Cobb to be anti-gay.

Byrne claims he does not support the anti-gay resolution now, claims he did not support it then, but he definitely voted for it then, so he would likely vote for it today too since he voted for it back in 93 when he did not support it (according to him).

What would be "something of that nature" anyhow? To state the obvious, an anti-Mexican resolution would be "something of that nature."

Can we extrapolate from Byrne's claims that Byrne is saying he would not vote for an anti-Mexican resolution?

I am sure a promise for an anti-Mexican resolution would get him votes around here. The way things go around here, the Baptist church is probably mad Byrne today suggests he would not vote again to be anti-gay (even if it's a lie for the sake of political expedience)!

Why do things go that way around here, though? Why are people here so embittered against those who are different in some way no matter how slight or irrelevant? Because everything is the Civil War all over again! If we keep fighting it over and over and over, maybe some day we will win one and everybody will then have to be just like us, not like them.
Funny ;-)
|
July 21, 2014
o true about the Civil War fight.
daveyy
|
July 21, 2014
Concerning the 1993 resolution, why would anyone feel guilty voting for it if they voted the way their constituency would want them to vote? Does this reflect the inner conflict of the politician voting his conscience or that his public? What was wrong then is wrong today. Too bad the cultural and intellectual elites of today don't allow for spiritually-based morallity to help guide anyone's thought process, but, will, in fact, consider it intellectually stagnant if biblically-based morallity plays any part in anyone's thought process. I weep for a society that is not willing to stand up for what they believe.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides