New testing system set for Georgia classrooms
by Haisten Willis
June 05, 2014 04:00 AM | 8270 views | 4 4 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Marietta City Schools Superintendent Emily Lembeck
Marietta City Schools Superintendent Emily Lembeck
slideshow
MARIETTA — The Georgia Department of Education announced Wednesday a new testing system called the Georgia Milestones Assessment System, or Georgia Milestones for short, will be put in place for the 2014-15 school year.

The test will replace both the Criterion-Referenced Competency Test and the End of Course Tests previously given to Georgia students.

The new test system aligns with Common Core education standards adopted by 45 states and, according to the state, will be tougher than the tests it replaces. The state also says the test provides a consistent program across grades 3 through 12, whereas before, the CRCT was given to grades 3 through 8 and the EOCT was taken by high school students.

For now, the test is unfamiliar territory for most educators in the state, including Marietta City Schools Superintendent Dr. Emily Lembeck.

“I look forward to learning more tomorrow through a department of education webinar,” Lembeck said. “From what I know at this time, I welcome the challenge of a new assessment system that will align with the more rigorous standards and is a system, not a series of disjointed tests.”

By the fifth year of implementation, Georgia Milestones will be administered entirely online, according to the Georgia Department of Education. Only 35 percent of Georgia students took the EOCT online in 2013-14.

“There are expectations for the transition to online administration, which should yield faster scoring and information, as well as the potentially higher engagement of students who are increasingly using technology in school and at home,” Lembeck said.

Test scores are likely to drop the first year because of increased expectations, according to the state department of education.

“It is a much more difficult test than the current CRCT and EOCT,” said Matt Cardoza, spokesman for the state DOE.

“The new tests will require students to show and write out answers to questions, where the old tests were only multiple-choice. We saw the first evidence of lower scores with last year’s coordinate algebra End of Course Test, which was based more on the new type of test.”

The move will also bring Georgia’s tests in line with other indicators of student achievement, according to John Barge, Georgia state schools superintendent.

“We need to know that students are being prepared, not at a minimum competency level but with rigorous, relevant education to enter college, the workforce or the military at a level that makes them competitive with students from other states,” Barge said in a release.

Another change with Georgia Milestones is the test will include open-ended questions, which the state DOE says will more closely measure how much students have learned.

Chris Ragsdale, interim superintendent of Cobb schools, said local schools are already working to implement the new test.

“We knew that the shift to new state tests was planned to take place in the upcoming school year, but we still have questions about what that will entail,” he said.

“With our teachers out for the summer, there will not be an opportunity to inform those who will administer and prepare students for these tests. Fortunately, we already have been preparing for this change by enhancing our local assessment

practices.”

Ragsdale expressed optimism about some aspects of the new test.

“We certainly had an idea the new tests would be in tune with the Georgia Performance Standards,” said Ragsdale.

“The fact that the new tests are to have open-ended questions and focus on problem solving and critical thinking is very positive. I support more rigor, even if it means scores will drop in the near term. Even though I believe our students are practically overwhelmed with tests as it is, these particular assessments are critical and will play a key part in my focus on using data to help improve our work in the classroom.”

Common Core worries linger

The Georgia General Assembly nearly pulled the state out of the Common Core curriculum standards this spring, but elected not to do so. Common Core has remained a point of contention for people such as Marietta’s Tanya Ditty, a state director with Concerned Women for America.

“The test is aligned to the Common Core standards, so Georgia children already have a deficit on this test,” she said. “Common Core is subpar to the Georgia Performance Standards.”

Ditty said she looked at the website for McGraw-Hill, the company that developed the test and noticed it’s a test any state can purchase. She wonders where the state of Georgia became involved in writing the test.

“Georgia needs to be in control of the test and the questions,” she said. “They went and bought some standardized test any state can use. Are we controlling the test? That’s critical for teacher evaluations.”

The state awarded a bid to McGraw-Hill to develop the new testing system at a cost of $107.8 million over five years, according to the state.

Kathleen Angelucci, chairwoman of the Cobb Board of Education, has her own concerns.

“The Georgia Department of Education has stated that the questions will be open-ended, which leaves room for subjectivity with regard to assessing true knowledge of the subject matter,” Angelucci said.

“They are already predicting low scores, which does not bode well regarding expectancy of success for student achievement. True knowledge is key, not constant assessment.”

Other issues Angelucci sees are the instructional time lost to increased assessments and the lack of knowledge about the test’s effects on local schools until it has been given for several years.

“The fact that these tests will eventually be required to be administered solely online means more technology costs/unfunded mandates being handed down to school districts in Georgia when there are some that can’t even afford to keep the lights on,” Angelucci said. “The new testing system is reportedly projected to cost $107.8 million. The question is how much more of a burden will donor districts like Cobb have to bear in order to support untested, unproven, expensive reforms being passed down from the state?”

Angelucci’s counterpart in the Marietta school system, Randy Weiner, has a more positive outlook on the test.

“It sounds like it will be more aligned to what’s taught in the classroom, with more relevant and rigorous standards,” Weiner said. “I hope this is another move in the right direction.”

According to his research, Weiner said the new test will cost about $6 million less per year than the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, a test Georgia pulled out of in 2013. Overall, he does not oppose the test or the Common Core standards.

“I hope this set of standard will be here for a long while, if it’s as good as we’re hearing it is,” he said.

Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Cobb School Advocate
|
June 05, 2014
Here they go - changing the baseline again ! The results is no one knows what's up or down let alone a measurement for academic progress ! Oh well ?
Not enough computers
|
June 05, 2014
I don't know how they will test 3-5 grades all at the same time with computers. Even one grade level at a time will be a huge challenge. We never have laptops that run enough for one classroom, let alone a whole grade level. Good luck with that!
Just a thought
|
June 05, 2014
If Georgia Milestones is being rolled out in the fall and a majority of the teachers weren't aware of the new changes, how will this affect teacher's evaluations on the TKES if 50% of their evaluation are tied to the progress of their students in their classroom? Will there be a ramp up period to allow principals to train their teachers in ample enough time so the teachers can effectively implement and measure their students without a negative reflection upon the teacher? I like the online assessment and the quick turn around time for results, but once again, education seems to find the latest and greatest marketing package wrapped up in a nice little bow and administered on the backs of teachers and administrators in the name of rigor and relevance. The only rigor is that it adds one more thing on the list of thousand things a teacher and the administration has to complete and the relevance is that there really isn't any if the system keeps changing the product. It is only when you open the present and reveal the contents that the Trojan horse is exposed. It is like the Pelosi comment of "You have to vote for it to see what is it in..." How many times has Georgia changed its standards in the past decade and why? And where has it improved Georgia education without numbers being manipulated? Cost effectiveness seems to be of consideration in this decision, but we all know the real cost after the fact...nothing is ever what it seems. Once again a moving target. Interesting how all this information comes out after the teachers are out for the summer. Good morale builder for the open session of fall. When will education ever learn that to attract and retain quality professionals, you must treat them like professionals, not like pawns in a system that honestly doesn't support teachers.
TKES Invalid
|
June 05, 2014
If the state moves forward with this, then TKES will be invalid. The 50% portion of TKES is based on a growth model with a complicated algorithm which basically compares previous years test scores and similar students and determines if a student made adequate progress. If the assessments are different then there will not be a valid correlation of data. TKES already has so many points of concern for educators, I see lawsuits...
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides