‘Appearance’ is everything about ethics
April 18, 2014 01:15 AM | 2164 views | 5 5 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print

When a city or county attorney’s office does not represent the ethics commission, should that office play any role in an ethics proceeding? I don’t believe it should.

But that is what happened recently in Cobb County, according to an article last week in the Marietta Daily Journal. After an ethics complaint was filed against four of the five county commissioners, the county attorney (Deborah Dance) quickly filed a response “asking the ethics board to dismiss the complaint, which she called unfounded and based on non-legal claims.”

A city or county attorney’s office should not represent officials in ethics proceedings. These are not civil proceedings against the local government that include individual officials as defendants. They are citizen oversight proceedings against individual officials for the alleged breaching of personal fiduciary duties. A city or county attorney’s office should tell officials that they must seek private attorneys to represent them. And it should leave the determination of allegations to the ethics commission and its counsel.

The city or county attorney’s opinion can only harm the ethics process, because the opinion will be seen as biased toward the respondents. If the ethics commission agrees, it will look as if it too is biased toward the county commissioners.

It was good to see that the ethics board’s counsel (Lynn Rainey) said the right thing in offering to withdraw from participation in the proceedings because he is also counsel to the Cumberland Community Improvement District, which provided a grant in support of the project that is the subject of the complaint.

Rainey is quoted as saying, “I believe, under the circumstances there may be an appearance that I may be in conflict even though I’ll tell the board I don’t feel like that would be a problem or that I could do anything other than be fair and impartial in my consideration and advice to the board. But I think appearances, especially with the Board of Ethics, are very important.”

We all feel we can be fair and impartial, but what matters is how we appear. And how the county attorney’s opinion appears is biased, even if it may be totally correct.

Robert Wechsler

Director of Research

City Ethics, Inc.

North Haven, Conn.

Editor’s note: City Ethics is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that provides information and advice on local government ethics issues nationwide.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
Rich Pellegrino
April 19, 2014
So someone who runs for office and loses or who wins and is in the minority party shouldn't point out obvious unethical behavior of those who are elected or are in the majority party. What kind of democracy do you live in (or is it a plutocracy where a few with big money do whatever they want)?

Stay tuned for more ethics complaints...this is just the beginning.
April 18, 2014
Chip on shoulder or not, unethical behavior by commissioners is no laughing matter to those of us who do not engage in it.
No basis complaint
April 18, 2014
That does not negate the fact that the complaint has no basis and is being brought by a man with a chip on his shoulder having lost two elections in a row.
Chris Lambrecht
April 19, 2014
The fact that Mr. Savage "lost" two elections has little to do with his concern that the county commissioners have erred. I know Mr. Savage personally and thank goodness we have citizens like him that try to hold government officials accountable. As has been noted in the debate concerning the new Falcons stadium in downtown Atlanta, rarely to these issues land in the favor of the taxpayers. No doubt certain developers will become richer, and let's watch carefully which candidates in the next elections those developers choose to fund.
April 19, 2014
Awfully smug of you to assert that there is no basis for a complaint. Certainly at a minimum the commissioners violated the spirit of the open meetings act by shuttling commissioners in and out of a room two at a time to circumvent the law. Let's see what the ethics board has to say before dismissing Larry so easily.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides