Jury: White officers falsely arrested black teen
by Joe Mandak, Associated Press
March 31, 2014 01:40 PM | 463 views | 0 0 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In this Jan. 22, 2010 file photo, Jordan Miles, then an 18-year-old high school student, talks about his hopes to go to college to study crime scene investigation at his home in Pittsburgh. Three white officers accused in a federal civil rights lawsuit of beating Miles falsely arrested him but didn't use excessive force, a jury found Monday, March 31, 2014, awarding him $119,000 in damages. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic, File)
In this Jan. 22, 2010 file photo, Jordan Miles, then an 18-year-old high school student, talks about his hopes to go to college to study crime scene investigation at his home in Pittsburgh. Three white officers accused in a federal civil rights lawsuit of beating Miles falsely arrested him but didn't use excessive force, a jury found Monday, March 31, 2014, awarding him $119,000 in damages. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic, File)
slideshow
PITTSBURGH (AP) — Three white officers accused in a federal civil rights lawsuit of beating a black art student falsely arrested him but didn't use excessive force, a jury found Monday, awarding him $119,000 in damages.

The all-white jury of four men and four women reached a split verdict in 22-year-old Jordan Miles' lawsuit against officers David Sisak, Michael Saldutte (sal-DOO'-tee) and Richard Ewing. They found the officers liable for falsely arresting Miles but found them not liable for using excessive force to beat him.

The jurors awarded Miles $101,000 in compensatory damages and $6,000 from each officer for punitive damages for acting "maliciously and wantonly."

Miles had claimed the officers confronted him in January 2010 while he was walking to his grandmother's house to spend the night. He says they assumed he was a drug dealer because of his race and dreadlocks and beat him. At the time, he was an 18-year-old senior at Pittsburgh's performing arts high school and had no history of police trouble.

The officers say they got rough with Miles because he fought with them while they mistakenly thought he had a gun.

The verdict stemmed from a retrial granted after another jury two years ago rejected Miles' civil rights claims that police maliciously prosecuted him for assault, resisting arrest and other crimes when he ran from and fought with police on Jan. 12, 2010. The criminal charges were dismissed weeks after Miles' arrest by a city magistrate who said he didn't believe the police version of events.

But the first federal court jury in August 2012 couldn't decide whether Miles had been wrongfully arrested or whether police used excessive force in the process, leading to a retrial on those civil rights claims.

Miles contends he was talking on his cellphone to his girlfriend while walking a block to his grandmother's house, where he routinely spent the night, when the plainclothes officers rolled up in an unmarked car asking for money, drugs and a gun without identifying themselves. His lawyers contend that practice — which police denied using — is commonly known as a "jump out" and used to put suspected drug dealers on the defensive.

The officers maintain they flashed their badges and yelled "Police!" and stopped Miles only because he appeared to be lurking near a neighbor's home. They claim Miles panicked and ran after being asked why he was "sneaking around" — and the confrontation escalated when Miles purportedly elbowed Saldutte in the head, then kicked Sisak in the knee, before officers mistook a "bulge" in Miles' coat pocket for a gun.

The officers contend they discovered the bulge was from a bottle of Mountain Dew. Miles denies carrying the bottle; officers say they later threw it away.



Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides