Cobb lawmakers push bill shielding public records of private contractors working for the government
by Nikki Wiley
February 20, 2014 04:00 AM | 5907 views | 12 12 comments | 31 31 recommendations | email to a friend | print
State Rep. Earl Ehrhart of Powder Springs.<br>Staff/Laura Moon
State Rep. Earl Ehrhart of Powder Springs.
Staff/Laura Moon
MARIETTA — Two Cobb lawmakers have signed onto a bill that would exempt private contractors doing government business from Georgia’s Sunshine laws.

Critics argue the legislation flies in the face of transparency.

Rep. Earl Ehrhart (R-Powder Springs) and Rep. John Carson (R-northeast Cobb) have co-sponsored House Bill 976, which would hide from public view the payroll and personnel records of private contractors being paid to perform services on public property. The bill would also shield subcontractors.

Such records are available to the public now under the Georgia Open Records Act.

That’s because taxpayers and citizens have a “keen interest” in private companies who do public work, said Hollie Manheimer, executive director of the Georgia First Amendment Foundation.

Records available to the public under the state’s current Open Records law include salary information, safety records and disciplinary actions along with other documents used to conduct government business.

“This would reverse decades of progress that our state has made in recognizing that private contractors must agree to appropriate public scrutiny when they are performing a government function, including providing service on public property,” Manheimer said.

Ehrhart argues allowing salary information to be accessed by the public violates basic privacy.

“My understanding is people are beginning to use open records requests for the sole purpose of gaining records of private and private businesses payroll records,” Ehrhart said. He declined to provide an example of such an incident.

Ehrhart posed a hypothetical situation in which a sheet rock contractor performs thousands of jobs

in one year with two being government contracts. Two out of the contractor’s 500 employees work on the government project but all of the company’s personnel records are now open to the public.

“I can’t imagine that this is even controversial,” Ehrhart said.

But David Hudson, attorney for the Georgia Press Association, said Ehrhart’s example isn’t accurate. He said under current law only those employees engaging in government work are subject to public records laws, not the company’s entire staff.

“The law is needed even for a sheet rock contractor,” Hudson said. “Is the contractor using undocumented workers? If it is cost plus, is the payroll padded? Are workers employed only because they are related to public officials of the agency? These are just samples of why public oversight is necessary when the funding is coming from public funds.”

Carson, a co-sponsor along with three other lawmakers, did not return phone messages or emails by press time Wednesday.

Ehrhart disputes motivation is Braves

Manheimer argues private businesses are not obligated to contract with the government and taxpayers should be able to learn to whom their money is being paid for government work.

“No private contractor is ever required to perform services on a public facility. They choose to seek out public work paid for with taxpayer dollars,” Manheimer said. “In doing so, it is only appropriate that they accept a level of transparency with that role so that the citizens of this state can confirm that public money is being spent wisely on qualified personnel.”

Ehrhart doesn’t buy that argument and countered that employees’ records shouldn’t be open to review because the company “they happen to work for” does business with the government.

He maintains his only motivation in co-sponsoring the bill is protecting the privacy of individual employees.

Still, it was Ehrhart who first connected Cobb Chairman Tim Lee with Atlanta Braves executives before the $672 million stadium deal was hatched using $300 million in public dollars.

Though some critics allege the legislation has been introduced to protect contractors who may profit from the construction of the new stadium near Cumberland Mall, Ehrhart laughingly disputed that claim, calling it the “best joke he’s heard all day” and mocked his critics.

“I think they need to readjust their tin foil hat,” Ehrhart said. “Please quote me on that. Please ask them to adjust their tinfoil hat.”

Personnel records considered under 2012 revision

Hudson was in no laughing mood.

Hudson said he finds it difficult to justify what the bill’s sponsors want to accomplish. He said the media has always fought to keep records pertaining to public projects or contracts open to the public.

That’s the only way, he said, to ensure “funny business” does not take place.

“Consider this hypothetical,” Hudson said. “A local government hires a private contractor to perform the maintenance work on local government vehicles. A series of accidents occur and they are blamed on maintenance defects in the vehicles.”

If the public wanted to see personnel records of the contractor’s employees, those records would be closed under the proposed legislation.

“In fact, it was a similar type request that uncovered school bus drivers without proper licenses, or with bad driving records, employed by a private contractor hired by the Atlanta School Board some years ago,” Hudson said.

Ehrhart disagrees with that example.

“I think it’s hyperbole and I don’t think it’s relevant,” Ehrhart said adding safety records would come out in any court proceedings that followed an accident.

Georgia’s Sunshine laws were revised in 2012, strengthening fines for governments that violate open records or open meeting laws, encouraging more meetings take place in open sessions and lowering costs governments may charge for information.

But payroll and personnel records weren’t exempted during those revisions to the Open Records Act.

“Perhaps we should take the position that these exceptions were comprehensively reviewed and revised by the office of the Attorney General and public interest advocates during the 2012 session, and without any dispute the requirement that these records be made open has been continued in the law,” Hudson said. “And it should remain that way to avoid any ability to abuse the bidding system by keeping key information secret.”

Comments-icon Post a Comment
February 21, 2014
Our House and Senate are all about the Sunshine Law for everyone else. The Sunshine Law does not apply to them. Sam Olens wrote it that way so he could get it voted into law. How about being transparent yourself Ehrhart. Our state law makers are no better than the crap that works for us in DC. How about investigating that MDJ if you have the courage.

ALEC at it again
February 20, 2014
Right out of Ehrhart's ALEC playbook, of course Earl is ALEC's GA State Chair and a former ALEC National Director.
Old Doc
February 20, 2014
The most absurd action ever taken by a Cobb legislator. Unbelievable!
old timer
February 20, 2014
They are getting ready for the new stadium in cobb county. What's next
Get rid of Erhart
February 20, 2014
Earl should have been voted out last election. I wish people would just get rid of him because he is always up to shady deals!
February 20, 2014
Am I the only one who think this stinks of corruption?
February 20, 2014
Just a wild guess, but there goes a lot more jobs for America and an increase in the illegal immigrant population of Cobb County.

I thought the destruction of American jobs was the responsibility of Federal office holders.
Just Wait
February 20, 2014
Sure looks like the Republicans are working hard to pull the shade down on the Sunshine Law!
Kennesaw Resident
February 20, 2014
There they go again with special exemptions for special interest groups! Sounds like the party elite are at it again in this Banana republic.
Just Sayin'....
February 20, 2014
This is, without a doubt, the worst idea these two gentlemen could possibly put forward, though it does smack of legislation being written by the Cobb Chamber of Commerce. I am sure the usual stalwarts are all in favor of it. (i.e. Lee, Loud and the gang.)
February 20, 2014
That is unconstitutional any project that is public private is tied to any taxpayer funds is than public and if said businessman wants to do business with the government agencies than he is tied to full discloser. This is a way for rich Republicans to hire illegals to do the work and taxpayer pick up the tab with mischarging and whatever else they want to hide. Any state legislator that backs this needs to be taken out of office plain and simple!! EARL YOU NEED TO PUT YOUR CONIE CAP ON I'M BOUGHT AND PAID FOR.
Clarence B
February 20, 2014
Rich Democrats don't hire illegals ?
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides