Cobb County officials debate transit solutions
by Jon Gillooly
February 02, 2014 12:02 AM | 11842 views | 11 11 comments | 39 39 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Tony Morris, president of AMT Inc. — a technology developer — stands aboard a magnetic train car with Cobb Commissioner Bob Ott on Saturday, taking in a view of the track in Powder Springs.
Tony Morris, president of AMT Inc. — a technology developer — stands aboard a magnetic train car with Cobb Commissioner Bob Ott on Saturday, taking in a view of the track in Powder Springs.
MARIETTA — As commissioners prepare for the findings of a bus rapid-transit study connecting Kennesaw with Atlanta, their transit board learned about such alternatives as monorail and magnetic levitation.

Tony Morris, president of AMT Inc., has an office on the Square and a test track for his magnetic levitation train in Powder Springs. Morris said his company can build a maglev train for about $25 million per mile, although AMT has not yet built any revenue-producing systems.

Morris has studied the 21.5 mile route from Kennesaw State University to the Perimeter and estimates it would cost $472 million to build a maglev train that would travel between those points.

If the county’s public bus system, Cobb Community Transit, were to operate the maglev train, he believes annual operations would cost $4.5 million to $5 million.

William Owen is a retired consulting engineer who has lived in Marietta for the last 55 years. His clients have included the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army, Postal Service, and Marietta and Atlanta housing authorities. Owen has created a company called the Georgia Monorail Consortium, which he operates out of his home. He has not built a full-scale monorail system before.

“The monorail system is a design, and it’s not something that is in being,” he said.

Disney World’s monorail came about when Walt Disney had his engineers design one for the theme park and then hired others to build it, Owen said.

He estimates a 30-mile monorail system would cost $42 to $45 million per mile to build.

Ron Sifen, a member of the county’s Transit System Advisory Board, invited the two to speak to the transit board on Monday.

“Neither really presented themselves as being an alternative to BRT for Cobb Connect,” Sifen said after the meeting. “That doesn’t mean that they couldn’t be a more cost-effective way of doing the Cobb Connect project, but at least for tonight, they have not yet positioned themselves as an alternative way of doing the Cobb Connect project.”

The BRT plan

Faye DiMassimo, the county’s transportation director, announced in January that the cost of a proposed bus rapid-transit system connecting Kennesaw State to Midtown had dropped from $1.1 billion to $494 million. DiMassimo said if commissioners were to approve the bus plan and the funding fell into place, the system could be operational as early as 2018. The chief cost savings comes from eliminating the dozen grade separations — bridges and tunnels — planned along Cobb Parkway that would allow the buses to pass through traffic without stopping. An additional lane would be built along Cobb Parkway and reserved for the bus-rapid transit line. Traffic lights would be adjusted to allow the buses to pass through intersections unimpeded.

Cobb Community Transit already has 18 bus routes with a fiscal 2014 budget of $18 million. Of that sum, 33 percent is paid by passenger fares. The rest comes from federal grants and the county’s general fund, spokesman Robert Quigley said.

The county outsources its CCT operations to Lombard, Ill.-based Veolia Transportation, paying the firm $13 million annually. The county also employs seven people to run CCT operations, Quigley said.

Goreham: A good place for development

Cobb Chamber of Commerce Chairman Ben Mathis said he’s visited the bus-rapid transit system Cleveland uses and believes it has “a tremendous amount of value.” County Chairman Tim Lee is also a fan. Commissioner Helen Goreham says having some kind of mass transit along the Cobb Parkway corridor makes sense to her.

“I also envision a lot of development and redevelopment taking place in that 41 corridor where redevelopment needs to take place,” Goreham said. “Also, if we continue to grow as a county and as a region, and we have all these people moving here, well, where are we going to put them? If we want to put density somewhere, I certainly don’t want multi-family housing projects in west Cobb County. Why not along 41? Wouldn’t that be a smart place to place some high-density multi-family housing projects along a transit route?”

Goreham said an attractive feature of bus-rapid transit is that instead of having a fixed rail, it gives the county flexibility to adjust the routes. It’s also much less expensive than light rail, which DiMassimo pegged at

$3.7 billion.

Goreham hailed DiMassimo’s reduction of the BRT cost as well as U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson’s prediction that federal funding would come through to help finance the system.

“To me, there are a lot of indicators that say, ‘Hey, this is something that we need to consider highly,’” she said.

Goreham said what she needs to see is how the study recommends paying for the system whether that means through a sales tax or a special transportation district tax along the Cobb Parkway corridor or something else.

“If there’s going to be a sticking point on the area that might be a concern it’s the area of funding, and I’ve got to feel very comfortable with that area before giving a thumbs up on the proposal,” she said.

Ott has concerns

Commissioner Bob Ott is less enthusiastic. Pointing to how the county already heavily subsidizes Cobb Community Transit, Ott said he’s waiting to hear what the maintenance and operations costs will be.

Lee said that will be identified in April.

There is also the question of how much congestion will be created by eliminating the bridges or tunnels originally planned to keep the bus lane moving.

DiMassimo says the plan is to program the lights to turn green as the buses travel Cobb Parkway, but that means the lights in the crossroads will turn red.

“I think you’re going to increase the congestion, especially by getting rid of the grade separations,” Ott said. “You’re now going to start stopping the traffic or delaying the traffic coming across the street so the BRT can come through.”

The county just built its Windy Mac Connector to allow traffic to move better from west Cobb. It’s now preparing to build the Windy Hill East and West SPLOST projects to move traffic across Windy Hill Road.

“Well, is that traffic now going to be stopped for a BRT coming down 41?” Ott said. “And is the same thing going to happen at the South Loop? North Loop? Are we going to create new congestion points by putting in the BRT?”

DiMassimo says there is enough right-of-way on the sides of Cobb Parkway to create an additional lane for the buses, but Ott said he’s waiting to learn where the stations will be built.

“All the transit stations I’ve seen — at least the ones around the world, there may be some different here in the United States — the transit stops are in the middle of the road, and you either have bridges or tunnels,” Ott said.

“You’ve got to get the people from one side to the other, so somewhere the passengers are going to be passing the travel lane.”

Lee said there could be some stations in the middle of Cobb Parkway and some on the sides.

“That’s what we’re going to find out in April is what type of stops for each stop location is the best

solution,” Lee said.

Will voters agree to a transportation tax?

As for another tax increase, Ott is skeptical whether the east Cobb residents he represents will agree to one.

“You can never predict what the voters will do, but if you’re talking about a transit corridor that’s going to go down 41, I can’t imagine that people in east Cobb, I don’t think many are going to use it,” he said.

“It will take almost as long for them to get to it as it would to go to their destination, and that’s why you have to put transit where the people are. It’s not where you want them to be or where you think they’re going to be. And I don’t have a problem with high-density development, but that’s what developers are for, not the government.”

A tax will most likely be recommended for paying for the system, although Lee said that’s not necessarily what the county will approve.

“Until I see the whole picture, I may come back and say this is not the right time to do this,” Lee said. “I think it is the right time, but the details need to be evaluated before anybody makes any firm decisions.”

Morris, the maglev designer, called BRT “the ride of last resort.”

“Anybody that could get a car would not ride BRT, at least that’s what we’ve seen internationally,” Morris said. “And of course what happened Tuesday night shows what the folly of BRT is because unless you have your own guideway that’s not going to ice up and snow up, it’s not going to get you much better than driving your car.”

Yet it’s clear to Morris county officials are moving full speed ahead with the BRT project.

“The fact is that BRT is going to be a distraction for the county, and I say that as a citizen almost more than a salesman,” he said. “It’s really not going to make any difference on the parking lot that’s otherwise known as 75. It’s not going to make any difference in getting to the Braves game. It’s not going to make any difference on Cobb Parkway.”

The buses will run, Morris said, “but the capital cost has to be paid by the taxpayer, and about 80 percent of the operating cost has to be paid by the taxpayer because fare box will only pay 20 percent of it. From my standpoint, I think that’s probably what the county is going to do.”

Comments-icon Post a Comment
New-Design Monorail
February 04, 2014
Too Experimental,

I am glad someone else is knowledgeable about AMT's failed ventures. They have a shiny test track. That's why they get attention. Notice how little information they gave about the second presenter? His design is a "second-generation" monorail system called HighRoad. It operates side-mounted trains on a single beam (not two beams like the traditional monorail, i.e. Disney World). Mounting on a single beam reduces construction costs DRAMATICALLY. Also, shorter trains increase frequency of arrival at stations. Much more efficient. This technology isn't experimental, but the design is new, and seems like a much more reliable, efficient alternative to an experimental technology like mag-lev. Worth looking into. Too bad MDJ virtually ignored Mr. Owen's design. Why? Who knows.
Too Experimental
February 04, 2014
A pretty damning report was publicized by Florida DOT last June. The problem is AMT still hasn't proven its claim that it could get up to a whopping 50 or 60 mph.
February 03, 2014
More and more studies and no action since the 1970s. This problem could have been fixed decades ago.

MARTA. When will Cobb get out of the 1960s mentality and move forward to 2014?
John West
February 03, 2014
BRT went from $1.1 billion to $494 million. Yippee! Now it's only a $494 million waste of taxpayer money.
Bernie F
February 03, 2014
Are we trying to move people or create development? What sense does it make to run BRT up/down US41? GDOT just let the contract to build a barrier separated lane on I-75. If the goal is to move people then run BRT on I-75. Mr. Gillooly, how is this point not part of your story?!?!

AND, this has to be a regional solution. Don't even think that there's even an inkling of a possibility that you can pass a Cobb tax to pay for this. Get together as a region with a regional solution. Mr. Ott is 100% right, East Cobbers will not vote to pay for a system they'll never use - especially if it's a system that moves Bartow/Cherokee commuters on the backs of Cobb taxpayers.
February 02, 2014
What we need right now that's practical:

1) We need commuter rail through the entire region (not just Cobb). Monday-Saturday service in the AM, one trip each way mid-day, and in the PM, to the various suburban areas through the entire region. We are one of the few cities with this many metro people that do not have ANYTHING at all like this in place, and it would take cars off of the roads if parking facilities were at each location.

2) The Cumberland Mall and Town Center Mall areas need a "PRT" (personal rapid transit) or "Ultra Light Transit" type system, which is an updated system similar to the small tram/train system at the Atlanta airport. The London airport has the newer system. They are quick and cheap(er) to build, and building a LOOP around each of these areas could connect the malls, convention areas, hotels, restaurants, and in the Cumberland case, the new stadium. Studies have shown that creating self-contained looped systems like this take a lot of cars off of the roads during the times in-between morning and evening rush hours, and reduce congestion in certain areas (the Perimeter Mall area would also be a good place for this).

Video about ULTRA type systems:

We do not necessarily need MARTA or a heavy rail system in Cobb as it is now - but we DO need commuter rail and these PRT systems in the heavy traffic areas. How many more *decades* will pass before Cobb leaders stop doing studies and actually do something about this??
Matt Stig
February 03, 2014
I think the best option is for MARTA to have a stop in the Cumberland area. This area is dense enough to warrant a station and if Cobb truly wants Cumberland to be a regional destination (stadium, Cobb Energy, etc.), then it needs to connect to the Airport and downtown.

From that station, you would then have 2 lines of Light Rail. One line would go North through Marietta and Kennesaw while another line went west to Smyrna, Mableton, and Powder Springs.

I'm from Cobb and a lot of decisions are about putting up a wall around the county to keep Atlanta out, but we need to integrate with the region to make this metro truly international.

Atlanta is just too auto dependent right now and that needs to change.
February 03, 2014
I agree - only some kind of rail system is really going to alleviate our current and future traffic problems in Cobb. Buses are not going to do enough.
February 04, 2014
Dallas has one of these at Las Colinas, which is somewhat similar to the Galleria area. An APT system like that would make a lot of sense, and would allow the area to continue to function in its current layout (that is to say, suburban edge city) while reducing the number of trips taken by car between places.
Sky Route Transit
February 02, 2014
Getting transit up in the sky, where it can fly over busy cross roads and run behind businesses rather than across their front entrances makes a lot of sense. Surface based transit is going to be in the way of traffic, pedestrians, and every other thing that wants to move on US41.

Good that the Commissioners are looking at this option.
February 02, 2014
Waste of money considering how spread out the county is. I think they should research turning more roads into highway-type roads with barriers in the middle and access roads on each side. Do what they do in the northeast with the jug handles or something similar.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides