Analyzing the analysis of Braves move from Atlanta to Cobb
by Don McKee
December 15, 2013 10:58 PM | 1927 views | 3 3 comments | 37 37 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Don McKee
Don McKee
slideshow
The planned move by the Atlanta Braves to Cobb County has stirred angst in the city to our south and prompted the Associated Press to conclude that the decision “highlights long-standing disparities over wealth, where people live and transportation — all facets of life connected to race and social class in Atlanta.”

The piece then gets to the red meat: “The Braves will be moving from an area that’s predominantly black and relatively poor compared to whiter Cobb County — where the team says more ticket-buyers live.” Atlanta, the AP says, “is far from integrated, and the city’s politics, business and even sports teams reflect that gap.”

The implication is that the Braves move is somehow about race and class. A black Atlantan, who lives near Turner Field, is quoted saying “a large majority” of Braves supporters “are white folks.” And a Georgia Tech professor observes that major attractions often migrate toward money, and, “It becomes a class issue in a lot of ways.”

What if a large majority of Braves fans were black? What has that got to do with anything? Of course, major attractions migrate toward money — that’s what they’re in business for, not social engineering. Going after your market is a class issue? Poverty is a deterrent to ticket sales, the article informs us. Duh! It’s also a deterrent to going to the movies, eating out, buying a new car or a house and so on. So what?

The story does say “some suburban fans acknowledge the panhandling, barred windows and vacant lots in the area around Turner Field make them wary.” A Cobb man who works at a garage says his concern is security, not race. “When you leave the stadium, you run to your car because you don’t want to get mugged.” That’s the real meat in the story, not implied racism and classism.

But now that the Braves move has been dissected, when will we see such race and class analysis of other enterprises pulling out of downtown Atlanta? I don’t recall a similar piece when the Atlanta Journal-Constitution left downtown in 2010 after 145 years in the city. The AJC relocated its newsroom and offices to a building across from Perimeter Mall in what could be called a “whiter area of Fulton County,” or as Creative Loafing put it, “smack dab in the middle of the most affluent of OTP (outside the perimeter) communities.”

It happens that the AJC cited the same sort of factors the Braves did. The publisher said, “The decision was made to benefit our customers, employees and business.” That decision was evidently taken at face value while the Braves decision evidently needed analysis.

And where’s the race and class analysis of the moves by Atlanta Opera and Atlanta Ballet to Cobb Energy Performing Arts Centre? Likewise the move by the Atlanta Lyric Theatre from Midtown to Marietta.

The moves were made for sound economic reasons. And Cobb was selected as a more desirable place to live, work and run a business. That’s my analysis.



dmckee9613@aol.com

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Hank Moody
|
December 17, 2013
The AJC has a pathetic chip on its shoulder concerning the Braves move. All of their articles are negative. It's pathetic.
Keith C
|
December 17, 2013
The article being referred to was written by Ray Henry of the AP. It may be clever marketing by writing an article on such a hot-button issue as race, but I agree with Don's article here. I live in Midtown Atlanta which is of course in Fulton county, and I must say, it's so tiring to see the race card being played as a defense for lack of responsibility. The fact of the matter is that Turner field is in a run down area. Fulton county could have made the surrounding area around Turner Field more of a priority if they wanted to keep a good business relationship with the Braves, but instead the area has languished for years. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why the franchise is moving.
Alex Murphy
|
December 18, 2013
Although the referenced article is indeed from the AP, anybody following the AJC on this can see that they are going the route of TMZ and supermarket rags in trying to make a scandal out of this.

There is no doubt that they are taking the low road on this subject. Trying to create news more than report it.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides