Karzai tries to pull a fast one
November 27, 2013 12:00 AM | 778 views | 1 1 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
If Afghan President Hamid Karzai is bluffing with his 11th hour set of new conditions for the U.S. and NATO to remain in Afghanistan, we should call his bluff. If he’s not bluffing, we should start packing up to depart our longest war by the end of 2014.

The U.S. thought it had reached agreement with Karzai on a Bilateral Security Agreement that could have kept the U.S. there for up to another 10 years.

Indeed, the agreement had been “overwhelmingly” — the White House’s word — endorsed by a Loya Jirga, an informal but influential council of Afghan notables.

But at the very end of a three-day visit to Kabul by President Barack Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice, Karzai suddenly sprang a new set of demands on the U.S. delegation.

This is a typical Karzai tactic but enough is enough.

Karzai said he would not sign the pact “if another (U.S.) soldier sets foot in an Afghan home” even though tough new restrictions on such entries have already been agreed on.

Instead of signing the BSA by the end of this year, as agreed, Karzai now says he won’t sign until after his country’s presidential elections in April.

If he doesn’t sign when and as promised, the White House national security council backed up Rice by saying the U.S. would have “no choice” but to leave; our NATO allies would be only too happy to leave with us.

Karzai also demanded that the U.S. release the 17 Afghanis being held at Guantanamo.

We should be grateful for the opportunity to get rid of them but there are necessary U.S. legal and security procedures to be followed.

Rather bizarrely, he wants the U.S. to join with him in peace talks with the Taliban, although last summer when the U.S. arranged such talks in Qatar Karzai refused to attend.

Also at stake are $4 billion in international pledges to support the Afghan military after 2014 and $4 billion in development aid. If common sense won’t make him see reason, maybe the money will.

Otherwise, we’re out of there.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
dustoff
|
November 27, 2013
What in the hell are we doing in this country anyway, other than getting our military maimed and killed.

The US needs to keep its troops here at home and not be out trying to police the world. I lost a lot of friends in Vietnam and was injured myself over there trying to save a country that was lead by a corrupt slime ball leader who only cared about lining his pockets with good old US dollars.

And now we have been doing the same thing in this region since 1990 and Desert Storm.

We need to quit helping these countries, especially sending them tons of money, we have homeless, disabled veterans and seniors here at home who should be our number 1 priority ans running out all the illegals as our 2nd priority.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides