Bob Barr stands for Constitution
October 13, 2013 10:00 PM | 1301 views | 4 4 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Recently a Washington, D.C.-based magazine launched a misleading negative attack against our own Bob Barr; it was subsequently picked up by this newspaper.

I am reminded of what Winston Churchill said, when he observed that a lie can get halfway around the world before the truth can get its pants on. As someone who has known Bob for more than 30 years, I’m not going to sit back and let such attacks go unchallenged.

Bob Barr was part of the Newt Gingrich revolution that was swept into Congress in 1994; and it wasn’t long before he made his mark championing smaller government, fighting to balance the budget, reduce regulations, cut taxes and protect individual liberties.

Then, in just his second term, he was the first member of Congress to call for the impeachment of President Clinton. For these reasons, the Democrats and their allies in the national media eviscerated Bob; but he never let that dissuade him from his goal of increased individual liberty and decreased government power.

As a congressman, Bob enjoyed 100 percent or nearly 100 percent ratings from the National Right to Life Committee, the National Federation of Independent Business, the American Conservative Union, Americans for Tax Reform, and Citizens Against Government Waste; he currently is serving his sixth term on the board of the National Rifle Association. These organizations supported Bob because he supported the Constitution.

Importantly, Bob has never been afraid to re-evaluate powers given to the government that are no longer necessary, or that have been abused by the government. That is not “flip-flopping” — it is the essence of good, conservative governance.

I’ve known Bob for more than 30 years, and the Constitution always has been his guiding star; as it should be for all our public servants. And I, for one, appreciate the fact that Bob remains true to the Constitution, even if it means re-evaluating a vote he has taken and concluding that the government no longer needs or is entitled to exercise certain powers — such as some of those in the USA Patriot Act that we now know the government has been abusing. Bob saw these problems before a lot of us did, and we conservatives ought to thank him for it rather than spreading misleading facts or calling him names.

Bob also understands that many of the decisions now exercised by bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., are more properly vested in our states and local governments; and he has championed efforts to return those decision-making powers to local and state authorities. Here again, that is the essence of conservative governing.

The Washington establishment and their political allies in Georgia will attack Bob Barr by telling half-truths and distorting Bob’s positions; but those of us who know Bob Barr know that he is standing up for the Constitution and our rights to decide issues here in Georgia.

Tom Wilder

Chairman – Bob Barr

for Congress,

former Cobb County

state representative

Comments-icon Post a Comment
Robert Johnson
October 16, 2013
I have seen some of Bob Barr's pro-amnesty, open borders Libertarian positions - and it is only a matter of timebefore he goes back there. NO THANKS! And...a very poorly written letter. repeat repeat.
Lizard of Ahaz
October 14, 2013
Never have so few BSed so many as the TEA Party has....

TEA is UN-American we drink coffee.
Flip Flop
October 14, 2013
You did not address the stances that Barr took and changed. You mainly talked about what Barr stood for while a Republican representative. And by your NOT discussing why Barr made these changes you are being just like a typical politician.

I understand that you can "re-evaluate" a stance, but Barr was against several high profile issues as a Republican for many years, then he was against them when he ran for the Libertian party, and now is against them again as a Republican. If you can flip on an issue 3 times, then what do you really believe? What party can "buy" your support? Are you running in that party, just because you think you can be elected not because you believe in their stances?

I do not want an elected official that changes just to be elected. I have no idea if that official is ever going to keep his word.
East Cobber
October 14, 2013
Tom, spare us the platitudes...
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides