Even for the least of these
by Kevin Foley
September 27, 2013 12:19 AM | 2088 views | 5 5 comments | 47 47 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The Federal Reserve reported in June that the total value of the nation’s wealth reached a new record in the first quarter of 2013, with Americans accumulating more than $70 trillion in financial and real estate holdings.

So when Speaker John Boehner says the country is “broke,” does he understand the economy or is he just being his usual disingenuous self, providing cover for the GOP’s one-percent benefactors?

America’s vast oceans of cash explain why China continues to snap up U.S. Treasuries. Beijing knows the full faith and credit of the United States are as sound as ever.

Our nation’s massive wealth also puts into perspective the $80 billion we spend annually on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or food stamps. That number represents a few measly scraps from America’s abundant table and just one-tenth of what the U.S. spends on defense.

So it was appalling last week when House Republicans, including Phil Gingrey and Tom Price, gleefully passed legislation that would cut nearly $40 billion from SNAP, more evidence of their relentless campaign to punish America’s most vulnerable, including 170,000 veterans who would be dropped from the program.

“Anyone who genuinely supports cutting food stamps is not an intellectual or an ideologue — they’re a bully,” wrote 35-year-old Afghanistan combat vet Jason Kirell, a SNAP recipient. “And nobody likes a bully. Except other bullies.”

Some bullies even have the temerity to quote scripture to justify their disgraceful behavior.

“If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat,” tea party Rep. Kevin Cramer, an evangelical Christian from North Dakota smugly pontificated last week. It’s worth noting the farmers who elected his sanctimonious hypocrite have, since 2009, collected more than $10 billion in federal agricultural subsidies — not to work.

“We don’t want to turn the safety net into a hammock that lulls able-bodied people to lives of dependency and complacency,” added Republican Rep. Paul Ryan, casually stereotyping all SNAP recipients as indolent freeloaders. In fact, two-thirds of those relying on food stamps are elderly, disabled and children.

Like Cramer and Ryan, I was going to get preachy, reminding readers what Jesus had to say about how we’d better treat “the least of these” — and what to expect if we don’t. See the gospel of Matthew if you’re interested.

I’ll focus instead on the excuses mouthed by conservatives for cutting SNAP in half and hurting nearly four million of the least of these.

They claim fraud is rampant in the SNAP program. In reality, fraud represents just one percent of the program, according to the Department of Agriculture, which administers SNAP for benefit of those requiring food assistance as well as the agricultural industry that produces America’s bounty.

If House Republicans were really serious about fraud, they’d demand defense contractors repay $1.1 trillion the Pentagon says they bilked during George W. Bush’s disastrous presidency. Ah, but the military-industrial complex has the best lobbyists money can buy. The poor don’t.

No, you can’t use food stamps to “buy porn and liquor” as Fox News blowhard Eric Bolling declared. And millionaires don’t qualify for food stamps even if the Wall Street Journal’s Stephen Moore says they do.

Pope Francis, spiritual leader of America’s 78 million Catholics, spoke out passionately last weekend on the economic injustice that makes programs like food stamps and welfare necessary in the first place.

“Men and women have to be at the center (of an economic system) as God wants, not money,” he told an audience in Italy. “The world has become an idolater of this god called money … We want a just system that helps everyone.”

Let us pray the Republican money changers in Washington are listening.

Kevin Foley is a public relations executive, author and writer in Kennesaw.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
East Cobb Senior
September 28, 2013
Kevin Foley, the only problem with your so-called research is that you take facts then insert your disingenuous hyperbole, insulting name calling and usual denigration of any Republican or conservative. Nobody should be so naïve as to believe that only Republicans and conservatives are wrong on all issues and policies as you consistently portray. Your articles constantly blame all the ills of our great nation and the world either on G.W. Bush, Republicans or conservatives. Try drinking some of that good old Georgia Sweet Tea for a change and get away from that Kool-Aid you're swallowing.
Mike Woodliff
September 27, 2013
I posted a response to Kevin. It showed up for a while and then disappeared.

My point to Kevin is that one can access cash and that enables the buying of liquor and cigarettes. Therefore, his argument is invalid.

This is not the first time my posts have appeared and then disappeared. Who is responsible for this, the respondent or the MDJ? It's very frustrating.
Mike Woodliff
September 27, 2013
Much like you, Kevin, Eric Bolling may or may not be a blowhard. However, he's absolutely correct. EBT cards can and do deliver cash and with that cash, recipients can purchase whatever they wish.

I'm not interested in taking food from the disabled, the elderly or children and think this is one spending cut that can be skipped.

That being said, arguments against the cuts are weakened when they are factually incorrect.

Kevin Foley
September 27, 2013
Mike, I've made it a policy not to reply here unless I'm accused of misrepresenting the facts. You should know that I am extremely careful when I write anything for the MDJ, knowing it will be scrutinized by readers like you who disagree with me. Regulations from the SNAP web site -

Households CANNOT use SNAP benefits to buy:

Beer, wine, liquor, cigarettes or tobacco;

Any nonfood items, such as:

-- pet foods;

-- soaps, paper products; and

-- household supplies.

-- Vitamins and medicines.

-- Food that will be eaten in the store.

-- Hot foods.

Mike Woodliff
September 27, 2013
Kevin, I don't disagree with the idea that these programs shouldn't be cut. But you can access cash through them. My point was the Bolling isn't totally wrong since the cash can and does allow recipients to purchase cigarettes and liquor.

That being said, I'm not sure that the purchase of liquor or cigarettes by the SNAP or EBT recipients, is all that bad of a thing. I know that my life is made easier with the purchase of a few items that help me take my mind off problems.

By the way, you referred to Bolling as a "blowhard". Aren't you the person who disparages the name calling? I wouldn't do that any more. It weakens arguments.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides