Cobb school board set to select calendars for the next two years
by Lindsay Field and Hannah Morgan
September 26, 2013 01:48 AM | 3475 views | 13 13 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Some in the business community are calling for a later school start date for Cobb Schools because of how it could impact the economy, student summer jobs and family vacations.

The school board tonight will consider approving school calendars for 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. The group will examine two choices for each school year and versions vary depending on school start dates and whether there are fall or winter breaks in September, October and February.

Cobb Chamber of Commerce President and CEO David Connell said he “appreciates” the debate of traditional versus balanced calendar and understands whichever calendar is chosen should ensure that all students are provided the best educational opportunities.

But because the chamber represents businesses, he believes it’s important for the board to recognize in its decision that tourism in Georgia is a $51.2 billion industry and is the No. 1 industry in Cobb’s economy.

“We believe understanding those dynamics and realizing the number of businesses in our community that support and are supported by tourism should be a factor when setting the school calendar,” Connell said. “It is especially important if the calendar being considered includes an earlier school start date.”

Connell said since the education SPLOST that funds capital improvements for the school district is directly tied to sales tax revenue, it may be prudent for the school board to consider delaying the vote on the school calendar until more data on the potential economic impact of an earlier school start date can be determined.

Lindsey Burruss, spokesperson with Cobb Travel and Tourism, said her organization “conservatively” estimates that a one-week earlier start to the school year would carve nearly $21 million from Cobb’s travel and tourism industry.

This would mean about $210,000 less in SPLOST collections for the school system during that one-week period, Burruss said.

The school calendar came up at Cobb Travel & Tourism’s Tuesday board meeting.

“I guess my big concerns are, competitively, when you hear that every state in the Southeast, states that surround us, that we compete with, the tournaments and so forth, have more traditional later starts,” said Al Martin, a manager with Georgia Power who chairs the tourism board. “The other thing that’s interesting to me is if you consider the fact that the SPLOST that was passed to benefit schools, because travel and tourism is the largest industry in Cobb, you could assume that the most collections of sales tax come from travel and tourism, and if you’re shortening or impacting travel and tourism, that’s going to impact the SPLOST revenue. I think that would be another concern.”

Tourism board member Beth Lanser with Embassy Suites at Kennesaw Town Center, said the argument against starting school later, and having fewer breaks, is that students don’t retain what they’re taught during a long summer.

“But for me, not just from my aspect in my business, but as a parent, all those breaks do not help my kids because they just get into it, they’re in school for six weeks and they have a break,” Lanser said.

Cobb businesses prefer later start date

Park officials at Six Flags Over Georgia in Austell and White Water in Marietta say their sales and attendance numbers are impacted by earlier school start dates.

Spokesperson Emily Murray said in an email that a later school start date is more accommodating for family vacations and students, who make up approximately half of the two parks’ workforce.

This past season, Six Flags employed about 1,680 at its Austell park and another 680 at White Water.

Six Flags and White Water are open every weekend in March, April and May and daily between Memorial Day and Labor Day.

“(A later start date can also) achieve greater calendar alignment with surrounding counties without compromising the number of instructional days in the classroom,” Murray said.

The water and theme parks had an economic impact of $175 million for its 2012 season, according to Cobb Travel and Tourism. Murray declined to give details on how ticket sales are impacted by the range of start dates.

The company broke ground last week on its largest expansion in park history with the addition of Hurricane Harbor, a water park being built on the Six Flags property that is scheduled to open in May 2014.

Multi-billion dollar corporations like Six Flags aren’t the only ones feeling the pinch.

Mike Cotter, CEO of Atlanta-based Dynamo Pool Management, said his company, which hires about 300 high school and college students each summer to lifeguard at subdivision pools, many of which are in east Cobb, had to learn to deal with the change.

“Some of these subdivision pools stay open through Labor Day,” he said. “So, when schools start back earlier, students may get involved in extracurricular activities, which limits their ability to work at all or their hours.”

Cotter said his company hasn’t lost any money, but he has had to hire a second wave of lifeguards mid-summer the last few years because of the earlier start dates.

“We have been able to hire the staff to fill the hours that our customers are wanting but it does make it more difficult,” he said.

Board vote could be split

Going into Thursday night’s meeting, the board is potentially looking at a split vote.

Board Chair Randy Scamihorn, Vice Chair Brad Wheeler and northeast Cobb board member David Banks said they prefer Version B, or the calendar choices with more week-long breaks throughout the year and an earlier start date.

David Morgan, who represents southwest Cobb, and north Cobb board member Kathleen Angelucci declined to say which calendar they prefer until after tonight’s board discussion and southeast Cobb board member Tim Stultz said neither calendar is ideal for him.

Board member Scott Sweeney, who represents east Cobb, did not return phone calls or emails before press time Wednesday.

“B looks better … I don’t have a specific reason,” Scamihorn said. “I’ve heard it’s 40 to 1 for option B. The teachers, parents, like the breaks.”

Banks said he has preferred Version B since joining the board in 2009.

“It’s what 75 percent of the school families want, what the teachers want,” he said. “I got e-mails, most of them are supporting the B option. The majority of people want an earlier start with two breaks during the year.”

In an email, Stultz said neither calendar version is ideal to him because school still starts earlier than it should in both options.

“The lesser of two evils would be option A because it includes later start dates and a February break during the second year,” he said.

Stultz also said he still thinks spring break should coincide with Easter to allow families to travel for the holiday.

John Adams, co-founder of the teacher advocacy group EducatorsFirst, said his organization’s members prefer options B.

They surveyed teachers last year to see where they stood on the calendar and that more than 75 percent “overwhelmingly supported longer breaks in the fall and the winter, and an earlier start date.”

Adams said that teachers told him that breaks in the semester help to recharge them, and their students, and to help with the discipline of the students.

He also said teachers are “excited to see the board considering the two calendars.”

Tonight’s board meeting will begin at 7 p.m. with public comments. It will be held in the central office boardroom at 514 Glover St. in Marietta.

 

Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
darla Smythe
|
September 26, 2013
So if.Cherokee, Paulding and other districts do the balanced calendar, that makes it right.
anonymous
|
September 26, 2013
What about the maintenance and other hourly workers that do not get the weeks off? If you want to save money, set schedules so everyone is off, not just. Teachers. Oh wait, that would mean a pay cut and we can not do that.
Dad of Kids
|
September 26, 2013
What happened to those of us that graduated 20 years ago, that started school the day after labor day and got out the Friday before Memorial Day. The 3 FULL months of summer break. We are now the ones that are running successful businesses, having successful careers, and raising children (yes, I do have school aged children). We didn't get 5 "vacations" each school year and we turned out fine. The lack of retention excuse is garbage.

Why pay to cool the schools starting earlier and earlier each summer. Why pay to keep the buildings open longer and longer each year instead of closing them for a longer summer?

At this rate, summer "break" will end up 4 weeks long. The kids will have no chance at a summer job, camps, or summer vacations.

Enjoy remembering what your summer used to be because it is being quickly taken away.

Sarah Lyons
|
September 26, 2013
If there was any doubt as to where the MDJ stands on this issues, it is clear now. I find it questionable that the majority of this article was based upon the position of the Cobb County Chamber of Commerce and other businesses around the county. Quite simply, the CCSB does not answer to business owners, it answers to the parents of the children they are tasked with educating. Yes, business is important but the more important issue here is education, test scores, and student performance. Why is there no mention of these issues in the article?
A mom
|
September 26, 2013
OMG!!!! We are seriously letting BUSINESSES decide what is best for our students because it what is in their business' best interest? REALLY!? Come on Cobb County, let's wake up and not do what is best for the teachers, principals, moms and dads or the area BUSINESS but let's do right to our kids by doing what is best for THEM!
Watcher...
|
September 26, 2013
Does "A Mom" realize how much our Business Community pays in TAXES to CCSD.

Cobb Business are a MAJOR Stakeholder in CCSD! They should have a voice at the table.
@A Mom
|
September 27, 2013
When businesses and local revenue fund your schools, you better consider businesses. Don't whine about over crowded classrooms and low teacher pay while you are sitting in Disney World in February; you are going to get exactly what you deserve. What a fool.
Proofread?
|
September 26, 2013
There are a few repeated paragraphs and typos in this article, and it seems heavily pro-status-quo calendar, with little argument for the balanced calendar. I'd like to see more of a balanced viewpoint!
Samuel Adams
|
September 26, 2013
Over $200,000 in money for our school system and a more vital economy at stake because of the school calendar, and at least three board members are still harping on this early start date???? These three should be fired immediately! When all is said and done, their main duty as board members is the fiduciary duty. They and their constituents can have every opinion on Earth about Vacations in the middle of the school year and what the shrill teachers and parents want, but money is the bottom line. This should not be so difficult.
IceDogg
|
September 26, 2013
I went to public school for 12 years and the calendar didn't change once. Does the CCSB have nothing more important to be working on?
UNTRUE
|
September 26, 2013
Why do those not in the field of education feel that they know the facts? Schools are data driven and if that is a fact, which it is indeed true, then we should know that both teachers and students not only need, but require breaks between the school year. The data reflects that attendance and scores improve!!!! Everything is not about the Almighty Dollar. For the past six years or more, teachers are doing much more for less pay. Why doesn't someone address that FACT also
Lucy S. Williams
|
September 26, 2013
Because they are the ones who pay your salaries and without their businesses, you wouldn't enjoy half-step or step increases annually - something that's pretty much guaranteed to you as an educator no matter what, yet something that doesn't happen in the private sector.

PS - It's been said 100 times, if not 150, that test scores increase annually regardless of the calendar type, so that's a moot point.

PPS - Everyone is doing more with less, not just educators, so that argument is pointless!
@ UNTRUE
|
September 26, 2013
Where's your data?

Which scores? Some are up, some level, some down

What attendance? Here's the average daily attendance figures you can find on the CCSD Website in the Consolidated Financial Report;

2003 - 96.61% - Traditional

2004 - 95.29% - Traditional

2005 - 95.64% - Traditional

2006 - 95.74% - Traditional

2007 - 95.86% - Traditional

2008 - 96.03% - Traditional

2009 - 96.13% - Traditional

2010 - 95.89% - Traditional

2011 - 96.13% - Balanced

2012 - 96.32% - Traditional

Back up your data comments with facts.

At best, the 2011 balanced calendar year attendance was the same as 2009, a traditional calendar year. It was also worse than 2003 and 2012.

Your attendance argument holds less water than a bucket with holes.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides