Another set of lessons to be learned from shooting
by Susan Estrich
September 19, 2013 11:02 PM | 738 views | 3 3 comments | 34 34 recommendations | email to a friend | print
While details are still emerging about Aaron Alexis, the man responsible for killing 12 people at the Washington Navy Yard, this much is already clear. This man never should have had a security clearance that allowed him to enter the Yard. And he never should have been permitted to buy a gun.

This is a man with a history of repeated infractions as a Navy reservist and troubling run-ins with authorities. In one such episode, just last month, Alexis called police in Newport, R.I., to tell them he was being followed by three people whom he alleged had been sent to follow him by an individual he had argued with at a Virginia airport. According to the police report, Alexis complained that his followers were using a “microwave machine” to communicate with him through the walls, floor and ceiling.

A sure sign of mental illness? Yes. Alexis also told police he was a Navy contractor.

To their credit, the Newport police recognized that the Navy needed to know that one of its contractors was seriously unstable, and so they sent over a copy of his comments to the base police at the Navy facility in Newport.

It is not clear what, if anything, happened next. Twice in August Alexis sought treatment at VA hospitals, complaining that he could not sleep. Did doctors at that facility have access to the information provided to the base police in Newport? It seems they did not. He kept his security clearance. He continued to service Navy computers.

“The system didn’t pick up the red flags because the red flags in this case had not been fed into the system,” a Pentagon official told reporters. “Perhaps we need to look at the ‘filters’” that should be part of the files, the official said.

How does a man who had been investigated by police departments in Seattle and Fort Worth for shooting a gun in anger, who was hearing voices in Rhode Island, who twice sought treatment from the VA, who had told his neighbors that he suffered from PTSD and had gone as long as three days without sleep manage to get and hold onto a security clearance that allowed him access to Navy computers?

To what extent did budget issues — which have led to the outsourcing of security checks to for-profit firms — play a role?

And equally important, how is it that such a man could go into a gun store in Virginia and buy a shotgun?

Yes, we all know the official answers. He hadn’t been committed or arrested. If that is the bar, as it appears to be, then the bar is plainly too low.

Ironically, the Alexis case also teaches that gun control laws can work. Alexis reportedly tried to buy an assault weapon, but under Virginia law, he was not allowed to purchase one because he was not a Virginia resident.

As horrific as the violence was at the Navy Yard, it could have been so much worse.

Twelve people are dead at the hands of a man who never should have been allowed on the base. But many more are alive today because even the most limited forms of gun control save lives.

The NRA likes to say that guns don’t kill; people kill. True enough. And all the more reason to ensure that mentally disturbed, angry and troubled people like Alexis are not able to walk into a gun store and purchase firearms.

We may not have the facilities to treat every Aaron Alexis out there, but at the very least, we should do everything possible to prevent them from buying guns.

Susan Estrich is a law professor in Southern California.

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
anonymous
|
September 23, 2013
Aaron Alexis would have just loved having a big payday from the Navy from the settlement of a discrimination lawsuit because he was denied a security clearance. Even a vague insinuation of racial discrimination against minorities in the government or military can be a career killer for managers and employees whose job it is to check backgrounds. And large financial settlements are paid out by government agencies just to avoid any negative litigation in a discrimination suit even if discrimination is not proven.

Such as it has become in this once great country. Now a country of careerists who only want to make that cushy govenment retirement without any blemishes on their record by any means necessary.
AlexLS2
|
September 20, 2013
Virginia law allows non-residents to purchase firearms. You just need approval from the State Police.
Sax1031
|
September 19, 2013
"Ironically, the Alexis case also teaches that gun control laws can work. Alexis reportedly tried to buy an assault weapon, but under Virginia law, he was not allowed to purchase one because he was not a Virginia resident."

sad state that journalism is in. i try to give people the benefit of the doubt and just say they are dumb. but this stuff with guns crosses the lines. i can't accept that you are to dump to at least check state laws.

this guy passed a background check for the shotgun. he would have passed the background check for an ar15. Virginia does not have any kind of law you are describing. pure fantasy agenda driven bullshit by the government stenographers.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides