Obama’s IRS — Taking its cues from Cuba, Chavez’s Venezuela
May 14, 2013 11:50 PM | 2657 views | 1 1 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Rare among nations, the United States has a tax code that more or less works. It works because, by and large, taxpayers trust the competency of the agency that administers it, the Internal Revenue Service. But don’t overlook the “fear factor” as well. The IRS is one of the most feared agencies in the federal government.

That’s why it’s so important that the Obama administration, Congress and the IRS’ own inspector general address the very credible allegations that applications for nonprofit status from groups with ties to the political right were unfairly delayed, or unnecessarily subjected to extra scrutiny with onerous demands for additional documentation.

In spring 2010, the IRS began targeting applicants with names containing “tea party,” “patriots” and “9/12,” a group formed by conservative political broadcaster Glenn Beck. Also targeted were pro-Israel groups. Part of the IRS’s added scrutiny included asking for the groups’ donor lists — a bully-boy tactic clearly meant to intimidate potential donors.

As always seems to happen in these cases, the initial criteria began to broaden to include, according to a preliminary IRS report, “political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform/movement.”

In other words, if your group has been critical of the Obama administration, watch out!

Obama is on the verge of having his presidency go down in history as the one that copied the tactics of Castro’s Cuba and Chavez’s Venezuela.

The policy of targeting groups with conservative-sounding names became generally public only last week. President Barack Obama said he found out about the actions Friday, by which time the IRS had apologized for “inappropriately” targeting conservative groups. But there was no mention of punishment for those involved. And responsibility for the policy originated at high levels in Washington, according to The Washington Post.

Some on the left are taking a “ho hum” attitude, noting that the IRS commissioner at the time was a George Bush appointee. But what’s likely is that he was kept in the dark by pro-Obama officials elsewhere in the chain of command.

Obama called the revelations “outrageous” and said “there is no place for it.” That’s a good start. There’s no indication — at this point — that he knew what was going on. It was announced Tuesday that the FBI and Justice Department will investigate to see if any laws were broken. We would add a special prosecutor to that list.

The integrity of the Obama administration is now being directly challenged in an unprecedented manner. It is in his interest — and the country’s — to get to the bottom of this scandal ASAP and restore the integrity of the IRS. And it will take more than another CYA investigation by Eric Holder’s Justice Department to achieve that.

Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
rjsnh
|
May 15, 2013
Seriously...this is what you folks think...SERIOUSLY. You need to read more and write less.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides