In order to slam GOP, Obama willing to put the U.S. at risk
by Deroy Murdock
Columnist
May 08, 2013 12:35 AM | 1748 views | 0 0 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Not recently, if ever, has a U.S. president put Americans in physical danger in order to score cheap partisan points. Barack Obama’s just-reversed furlough of Federal Aviation Administration employees increased the probability that overstretched, unseasoned or distracted air-traffic controllers might miscalculate — possibly with fatal results. But what did Obama care? Blaming Republicans was his mission, even if that made Americans endure long airport lines, flight delays and greater risk of air disasters.

As The Wall Street Journal observed Friday, “The FAA’s all-hands furloughs managed to convert a less than 4 percent FAA budget cut into a 10 percent air-traffic control cut that would delay 40 percent of flights.”

The White House website claims that Americans ache “because Republicans in Congress allowed a series of harmful, automatic budget cuts — called the sequester.” Thus, “travelers were stuck for hours in airports and on planes.”

Congress did Obama’s job for him, giving the FAA the flexibility to respect the sequester’s spending limits, but prioritize air safety. In response, Obama whined in his weekly Saturday radio address: “Republicans claimed victory when the sequester first took effect, and now they’ve decided it was a bad idea all along.” Never mind that the sequester was Obama’s idea all along, as Washington Post legend Bob Woodward proved in February.

This all fits what the TrueSpeak Institute’s Jim Guirard calls Obama’s “harm offensive.” The one-time chief of staff to Louisiana’s late Democratic Sen. Russell Long says, “Obama’s strategy, tactics, and constant modus operandi seems to be ‘First, do all possible harm’ to the public in managing the mandated spending limitations, and then blame the damage, the suffering, and — in the case of airline safety — the deadly danger on the Republicans.”

Senior federal officials followed Obama’s example. As one FAA staffer complained in The Wall Street Journal, “The FAA management has stated in meetings that they need to make the furloughs as hard as possible for the public so that they understand how serious it is.”

Team Obama also exposed Americans to the menace of tainted meat (through reduced food inspections, which Obama threatened, but Congress prevented) and even wrongly released 2,232 illegal-alien detainees, including 629 convicted criminals. This all seems concocted to make Americans demand an end to the sequester and a return to spend-o-rama.

Obama’s recklessness is even more disgraceful given that he could recoup 79 percent of the $85 billion sequester by implementing $67 billion in savings recommended by federal inspectors general.

As the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee reported March 5, these unexecuted reductions in disorganization and theft have swelled from $26 billion in January 2009 to $67 billion today, up 157 percent since Obama arrived.

So, what kinds of repairs is Obama neglecting?

• Information systems remain vulnerable to sabotage. For instance, NASA’s IG declared that “six computer servers associated with information technology assets that control spacecraft and contain critical data had vulnerabilities that would allow a remote attacker to take control of or render them unavailable.”

• Federal bureaucrats too often write checks in their sleep. As Oversight observes, “agencies were sometimes too trusting, allowing contractors to bill after the fact in cases in which prices were not set in advance.”

• Federal officials are equally drowsy about collections. The Pentagon thus leaves $1 billion on the table annually. As the House paper specifies: “A large portion of this amount was the outstanding recoveries of payments made that were later deemed unallowable, including payments to deceased, retired military members.”

This $67 billion should be used for tax relief, national-debt reduction or for legitimate federal services — such as controlling airplanes, excluding E.coli from hamburger, and resuming White House tours.

Obama is doing something diabolical: harming and endangering Americans so they will scream for more spending. Targeting the people this way confirms that Obama’s reign has little to do with good intentions and lots to do with swelling Washington’s budget and deepening its penetration in our lives.

Deroy Murdock is a Fox News contributor and a media fellow with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace.
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides